Dye exclusion technique to assess the viability of pre-implantation bovine embryo based on a murine model

Authors

  • GURVINDERJIT SINGH Department of Animal Reproduction, Gynaecology & Obstetrics, College of Veterinary Science, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana, Punjab, India - 141 004
  • G R PANGAONKAR
  • JOGA SINGH MATHAROO
  • PRAHLAD SINGH
  • MEHAR SINGH

Keywords:

Viability assay, dye, murine embryo, bovine embryo

Abstract

Dye exclusion assay was evaluated for assessing viability of pre-implantation murine and bovine embryos
along with morphological examination of sucrose-induc<!d shrinkage and in vitro culture. Different concentrations
of the dyes were also investigated to determine the optima. A total of 460 murine and 76 bovine embryos, on
morphological evaluation revealed 71. 52 and 72.36 per cent viability, respectively. Dye exclusion assay of murine
embryos using Trypan Blue (0.05%), Eosin-Y (0.12 tn¥), Rose Bengal Red (0.5 mM) and Eosin-B (0.12 mM)
followed by developmental competence indicated 82.35, 81.25, 78.57 and 50.0 per cent viability, respectively.
The corresponding values in case of bovine embyros were 80.0, 87.0, 75.0 and 61.5 percent. The differences in
viability estimates due to dyes were statistically significant (P<0.05). Sucrose induced shrinkage ofmurine and
bovine embryos indicated 71.06 and 65.45 per cent viability respectively. Corresponding values by in vitro culture
were 73.62 and 70.9 per cent. The differences between morphological assay and other methods were significant
(P<0.05) but the differences between dye exclusion assay and developmental competence of embryos in culture
medium were statistically non significant.

Downloads

Published

2023-02-04

How to Cite

SINGH, G., PANGAONKAR, G.R., MATHAROO, J.S., SINGH, P., & SINGH, M. (2023). Dye exclusion technique to assess the viability of pre-implantation bovine embryo based on a murine model. The Indian Journal of Animal Reproduction, 23(1), 12–17. Retrieved from https://acspublisher.com/journals/index.php/ijar/article/view/5616