An Insight into the Challenges to Welfare of Small Ruminants in India and their Mitigation Strategies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ijapm.2024.40.SI.13Keywords:
challenges, climatic conditions, mitigation strategies, small ruminants, welfareAbstract
Small ruminants play a significant role in economy of India, contributing to the production of meat, milk, fibre, and skins. The rearing of these small ruminants serves as a crucial source of income and employment for a substantial portion of the population, with the majority being comprised of impoverished and small-scale farmers. Studies addressing the challenges affecting the welfare of small ruminants have been relatively scarce. Additionally, research on strategies aimed at mitigating the adverse effects of environmental factors and management practices on small ruminant welfare has been limited. This review aims to discuss the challenges that impact the welfare of small ruminants across various farming systems. These challenges include extreme climatic conditions and seasonal fluctuations, inadequate space and premises layout, microclimate control, health problems and many more. Different mitigation strategies are highlighted that can be adopted for improving small ruminant welfare under different production systems.
References
1. Le Neindre, P.; Bernard, E.; Boissy, A.; Boivin, X.; Calandreau, L.; Delon, N.; Deputte, B.; Desmoulin‐Canselier, S.; Dunier, M., Faivre, N.; and Giurfa, M. 2017. Animal consciousness. EFSA Supporting Publications, 14(4): 1196E.
2. Nedeva, I. 2020. Primary factors influencing sheep welfare in intensive and extensive farming systems-a review article. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 26.
3. Rushen, J. 2003. Changing concepts of farm animal welfare: bridging the gap between applied and basic research. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 81(3): 199-214.
4. Goddard, P.; Waterhouse, T., Dwyer, C.and Stott, A. 2006.The perception of the welfare of sheep in extensive systems. Small Ruminant Research, 62(3): 215-225.
5. Brambell, F. W. R. 1965. Report of the Technical Committee to inquire in to Welfare of Animals Kept under Intensive Livestock Husbandry Systems.Great Britain. Parliament.HM Stationery Office. Pp: 1-84
6. Fraser, D.; Weary, D. M.; Pajor, E. A.; and Milligan, B. N. 1997. A scientific conception of animal welfare that reflects ethical concerns. Animal welfare, 6(3): 187-205.
7. Fraser D. 2003. Assessing animal welfare at the farm and group level: the interplay ofscience and values. Animal Welfare, 12: 433–43.
8. Ursinus, W. W.; Schepers, F.; De Mol, R. M.; Bracke, M. B. M.; Metz, J. H. M.; and Koerkamp, P. G. 2009. COWEL: a decision support system to assess welfare of husbandry
systems for dairy cattle. Animal Welfare, 18(4): 545-552.
9. Veissier, I.; and Boissy, A. 2007. Stress and welfare: Two complementary concepts that are intrinsically related to the animal's point of view. Physiology & behavior, 92(3): 429-433.
10. Einarsson, S.; Madej, A.; and Tsuma, V. 1996. The influence of stress on early pregnancy in the pig. Animal Reproduction Science, 421- (4): 165-172.
11. Arey, D.S.; and Edwards, S.A. 1998. Factors influencing aggression between sows after mixing and the consequences for welfare and production. Livestock Production Science, 56: 61–70.
12. Lang, A.; Brandt, Y.;Häger, M.;Razdan, P.;Madej, A.; and Einarsson, S. 2003. Influence of simulated stress during pro oestrus on oestrous cycle characteristics in the sow. Reproduction in Domestic Animals, 38: 356.
13. Turner, A. I.; Hemsworth, P. H.; and Tilbrook, A. J. 2005.Susceptibility of reproduction in female pigs to impairment by stress or elevation of cortisol. Domestic Animal Endocrinology, 29(2): 398-410.
14. Hemsworth, P. H. 2007. Ethical stockmanship. Australian Veterinary Journal, 85(5): 194-200.
15. Broom, D. M. 1991. Animal welfare: concepts and measurement. Journal of animal science, 69(10): 4167-4175.
16. Hernandez, J. A.; Garbarino, E. J.; Shearer, J. K.; Risco, C. A.; and Thatcher, W. W.2005. Comparison of the calving-to-conception interval in dairy cows with different degrees of lameness during the prebreeding postpartum period. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association, 227(8): 1284-1291.
17. Prunier, A.;Heinonen, M.; and Quesnel, H. 2010. High physiological demands in intensively raised pigs: impact on health and welfare. Animal, 4(6): 886-898.
18. Hanna, D.; Sneddon, I. A.; and Beattie, V. E. 2009. The relationship between the stockperson’s personality and attitudes and the productivity of dairy cows. Animal, 3 (5): 737-743.
19. Hemsworth, P. H.; Coleman, G. J.; Barnett, J. L., Borg, S.; and Dowling, S.2002. The effects
of cognitive behavioral intervention on the attitude and behavior of stockpersons and the behavior and productivity of commercial dairy cows. Journal of Animal Science, 80(1): 68-78.
20. Waiblinger, S.; Menke, C.; and Coleman, G.2002. The relationship between attitudes, personal characteristics and behaviour of stockpeople and subsequent behaviour and production of dairy cows. Applied animal behaviour science, 79(3): 195-219.
21. Breuer, K.;Hemsworth, P. H.; Barnett, J. L.; Matthews, L. R.; and Coleman, G. J. 2000. Behavioural response to humans and the productivity of commercial dairy cows. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 66(4): 273-288.
22. Rushen, J. A. M. B.; De Passille, A. M. B.; and Munksgaard, L. 1999. Fear of people by cows and effects on milk yield, behavior, and heart rate at milking. Journal of Dairy Science, 82(4): 720-727.
23. Caroprese, M.; Napolitano, F.; Mattiello, S.; Fthenakis, G. C.;Ribó, O.; and Sevi, A. 2016. On-farm welfare monitoring of small ruminants. Small Ruminant Research, 135: 20-25.
24. Petherick, J. C. 2005. Animal welfare issues associated with extensive livestock production: The northern Australian beef cattle industry. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 92(3): 211-
234.
25. Dwyer, C. M. 2009. Welfare of sheep: Providing for welfare in an extensive environment. Small Ruminant Research, 86(1- 3): 14-21.
26. Phillips, C. J.; and Phillips, A. P. 2010.Attitudes of Australian sheep farmers to animal welfare. Journal of International Farm Management, 5Ed. (2): 1-26.
27. Pati, U. S.; and Kurade, N. P. 2008.Isolation, identification and in vitro antibiogram of Enterococcus fecalis from migratory sheep and goat. The Indian Journal of Veterinary Research, 17(2): 32-35.
28. Sharma, M.; Batta, M. K.;Katoch, R. C.; Asrani, R. K.;Nagal, K. B.; and Joshi, V. B.1996. Listeria monocytogenes abortions among migratory sheep and goats in Himachal Pradesh.Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 66(11): 1117-1119.
29. Sharma, M.; Batta, M. K.; Katoch, R. C.; and Andersen, A. A. 2008. A field investigation of
bacterial etiology of abortions among migratory sheep and goats in North-West hill states of India. Veterinarski Arhiv, 78 (1): 65-71.
30. Jithendran, K. P.; and Bhat, T. K.1996. Prevalence of dicrocoeliosis in sheep and goats in Himachal Pradesh, India. Veterinary Parasitology, 61(3-4): 265-271.
31. Jithendran, K. P. 1998. Epidemiology of gasterointestinal nematodes in migratory sheep and goats in north-west humid Himalayan region.Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 68 (9): 894-96.
32. Bath, G. F.; and Van Wyk, J. A. 2009.The Five Point Check© for targeted selective treatment of internal parasites in small ruminants. Small Ruminant Research, 86(1-3): 6-13.
33. Colebrook, E.; and Wall, R. 2004.Ectoparasites of livestock in Europe and the Mediterranean region. Veterinary Parasitology, 120(4): 251-274.
34. Dwyer, C. M.; andBornett, H. L. I. 2004. Chronic stress in sheep: assessment tools and their use in different management conditions. Animal Welfare, 13(3): 293-304.
35. Joshi, V. B.; Nagal, K. B.; Sharma, M., Katoch, R. C.;Batta,; M. K.and Sharma, A. K. 1996.Peste-des-petits ruminantsPPRamong Gaddi sheep and goats in Himachal Pradesh. Indian journal of animal sciences, 66(11): 1126-1127.
36. Madhu, D. N.; Sudhakar, N. R.; Maurya, P. S.; Manjunathachar, H. V.; Sahu, S.; andPawde, A. M. 2014. Nasal Oestrosis in a Jamunapari goat. Journal of parasitic diseases, 38(4): 396-
398.
37. Asrani, R. K.;Battn, M. K.;Katoch, R. C.;Jithendran, K. P.; Sharma, M. D.; Singh, S. P.; and Guptin, V. K. 1999. Outbreaks of verminous bronchopulmonitis among sheep and goats in Himachal Pradesh.
38. Kaler, J.; and Green, L. E. 2008. Naming and recognition of six foot lesions of sheep using written and pictorial information: a study of 809 English sheep farmers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 83(1): 52-64.
39. Ley, S. J.; Livingston, A.; and Waterman, A. E.1992.Effects of clinically occurring chronic lameness in sheep on the concentrations of plasma noradrenaline and adrenaline. Research in Veterinary Science, 53(1): 122-125.
40. Pugh, D. G.; and Baird, N. N. 2012.Sheep& Goat Medicine-E-Book.Elsevier Health Sciences, Pp: 252-256.
41. Tadich, N.; and Hernandez, M.2000.Prevalencia de lesions podalesenovinos de 25 explotacionesfamiliares de la provincia de Valdivia, Chile. Archivos de medicinaveterinaria, 32(1): 63-74.
42. Sharma, A; Negi, A. S.; and Bisht, V. B. 2002. Affections in migratory sheep of Himachal Pradesh.Indian Veterinary Journal, 79 (12): 1299-1301.
43. Wani, A. H.; Verma, S.; Sharma, M.; and Wani, A.2015. Infectious lameness among migratory sheep and goats in north-west India, with particular focus on anaerobes. RevueScientifique et Technique OIE, 34: 855-867.
44. Dogra, P. K.; Sankhyan, V.; Kumari, A.; Thakur, A.; and Kumar, N. 2018. Enhancing profitability of nomadic Gaddi goat production system for augmenting farmer’s income. Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management, 34: 36-39.
45. Dogra, P. K.; Sharma, V.K.; Panda, A. K.;Sood, P.;Sankhayn, V.; Sharma, P.; and Ashutosh2011. All India Co-Ordinated Research Project On Goat Improvement Gaddi Field Unit– CSK HPKV, Palampur Annual Report.
46. Waterhouse, A.; Holland, J. P.; McLaren, A.; Arthur, R.; Duthie, C. A.;Kodam, S.;and Wishart, H. M.2019. Opportunities and challenges for real-time management RTM in extensive livestock systems. In The European Conference on Precision Livestock Farming pp. 20-26.
47. Temple, D.; and Manteca, X.2020. Animal welfare in extensive production systems is still an area of concern. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 4: 545902.
48. Munoz, C. A.; Campbell, A. J.; Hemsworth, P. H.; and Doyle, R. E.2019. Evaluating the welfare of extensively managed sheep. PLoS One, 14(6): e0218603.
49. Rassu, S.P.G.;Enne, G.;Ligios, S.; and Molle, G. 2004.Nutrition and Reproduction In: G. Pulinaed.Dairy Sheep Nutrition. CABI Publishing, Wall-ingford, UK, pp. 109-128.
50. Negrave, R. 1996. Sheep grazing controls Calamagrostis Canadensis-dominated vegetation in the Boreal forest integrated forest vegetation management. Options and Application, FRDA Report, 251: 2.
51. Sevi, A.; Casamassima, D.;Pulina, G.; and Pazzona, A. 2009. Factors of welfare reduction in dairy sheep and goats. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8sup (1): 81-101.
52. Pulina, G.; Mazzette, A.;Battacone, G.; and Nudda, A.2006. Feed restriction alters milk production traits in Sarda dairy ewes. Journal of Dairy Science, 89 Suppl.(1):59.
53. Orr, R. J.; Parsons, A. J.; Penning, P. D.; and Treacher, T. T.1990. Sward composition, animal performance and the potential production of grass/white clover swards continuously stocked with sheep. Grass Forage Science, 45: 325
54. Penning, P. D.; Parsons, A. J.; Orr, R. J.; and Hooper, G. E.1994. Intake and behavior response by sheep to changes in sward characteristics under rotational grazing. Grass Forage Science, 49: 476-486.
55. Ayoub, M.A.; and Saleh, A.A.1998. A comparative physiological study between camels and goats during water deprivation. Emirates Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 10 (2): 44-60.
56. Casamassima, D.; Pizzo, R.; Palazzo, M.;Quaranta, A.; D’Alessandro, A.G.; and Martemucci, G. 2006. Effect of water restriction on production performance and on some blood parameters in intensively reared Comisana sheep.
Effettodellarestrizioneidricasulleprestazionipro duttive e sualcuniparametriematici in ovini di razzaComisanaallevatiintensivamente.In: Proc. 14th Int. Congr. FeMeSPRum, Santiago de Compostela, Spain, 477-478.
57. Hamadeh, S. K.; Rawda, N.; Jaber, L. S.; Habre, A.; Abi Said, M.; and Barbour, E. K. 2006. Physiological response to water restriction in dry and lactating Awassi ewes. Livestock Production Science, 101: 101-109.
58. Aganga, A.A. 2001. Water utilization by sheep and goats in Northern Nigeria. World Animal Review FAO, 73: 9-14.
59. Battini, M.; Vieira, A.; Barbieri, S.;Ajuda, I.; Stilwell, G.; and Mattiello, S. 2014. Invited review: Animal-based indicators for on-farm
welfare assessment for dairy goats. Journal of dairy science, 97(11): 6625-6648.
60. Singh, D. R.; Kaul, S.; and Sivaramane, N., 2006. Migratory sheep and goat production system: the mainstay of tribal hill economy in Himachal Pradesh. Agricultural economics research review, 19: 387-398.
61. Grant, C. 2004. Behavioural responses of lambs to common painful husbandry procedures. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 87(3-4): 255-273.
62. Sevi, A.; Massa, S.;Annicchiarico, G.;Dell'aquila, S.; and Muscio, A.1999. Effect of stocking density on ewes' milk yield, udder health and microenvironment. Journal of Dairy Research, 66(4): 489-499.
63. Luo, L.; Jansen, C. A.;Bolhuis, J. E.; Arts, J. A.; Kemp, B.; and Parmentier, H. K.2020. Early and later life environmental enrichment affect specific antibody responses and blood leukocyte subpopulations in pigs. Physiology &Behavior, 217: 112799.
64. Brandt, P.;Hakansson, F.; Jensen, T.; Nielsen, M. B. F.;Lahrmann, H. P.; Hansen, C. F.; and Forkman, B.2020. Effect of pen design on tail biting and tail-directed behaviour of finishing pigs with intact tails. Animal, 14(5): 1034-
1042.
65. Jensen, T. B.;Baadsgaard, N. P.;Houe, H.; Toft, N.; and Østergaard, S.2008. The association between disease and profitability in individual finishing boars at a test station. Livestock Science, 117(1): 101-108.
66. van de Weerd, H.; and Ison, S. 2019. Providing effective environmental enrichment to pigs: how far have we come? Animals, 9(5): 254.
67. FAWC (2009). Brambell’s Five Freedoms. Farm Animal Welfare Council (FAWC), The British Government, July 1979. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20 121010012427/http://www.fawc.org.uk/freedo ms.htm
68. Buijs, S.; and Muns, R. 2019. A review of the effects of non-straw enrichment on tail biting in pigs. Animals, 9(10): 824.
69. Wadhwani, K. N.; Modi, R. J.; Islam, M. M.; and Patel, Y. G.2016. Role of housing in welfare of small ruminants. Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management, 32(3-4): 130-
139.
70. Sevi, A.;Taibi, L.; Muscio, A.; Albenzio, M.; Dantone, D.; and Dell’Aquila, S. 2001. Quality of ewe milk as affected by stocking density and litter treatment with bentonite. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13: 77-86.
71. Sevi, A.;Albenzio, M.;Muscio, A.;Casamassima, D.;andCentoducati, P.2003. Effects of litter management on airborne particulate in sheep houses and on the yield and quality of ewe milk. Livestock Production Science, 81:1-9.
72. Bozzo, G.;Barrasso, R.; Grimaldi, C. A.; Tantillo, G.; and Roma, R. 2019. Consumer attitudes towards animal welfare and their willingness to pay. VeterinariaItaliana, 55(4): 289-297.
73. Caja, G.; Castro-Costa, A.; Salama, A. A.; Oliver, J.;Baratta, M.; Ferrer, C.;and Knight, C. H. 2020. Sensing solutions for improving the performance, health and wellbeing of small ruminants. Journal of Dairy Research, 87:34-
46.
74. Vaintrub, M. O.;Levit, H.;Chincarini, M.;Fusaro, I.;Giammarco, M.;and Vignola, G. 2021. Precision livestock farming, automats and new technologies: Possible applications in extensive dairy sheep farming. Animal, 15(3): 100143.
75. Morris, J. E.; Cronin, G. M.; and Bush, R. D. 2012. Improving sheep production and welfare in extensive systems through precision sheep management. Animal Production Science, 52(7): 665-670.
76. Halachmi, I.; and Guarino, M. 2016. Precision livestock farming: a ‘per animal’approach using advanced monitoring technologies. Animal, 10(9): 1482-1483.
77. Morgan-Davies, C.;Lambe, N.; Wishart, H.; Waterhouse, T.; Kenyon, F.;McBean, D.;and McCracken, D. 2018. Impacts of using a precision livestock system targeted approach
in mountain sheep flocks. Livestock Science, 208: 67-76.
78. Halachmi, I.; Guarino, M.; Bewley, J.; and Pastell, M. 2019. Smart animal agriculture: Application of real-time sensors to improve animal well-being and production. Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, 7: 403–425
79. Dawkins, M.S. 2021. Does smart farming improve or damage animal welfare? Technology and what animals want. Frontiers in Animal Science, 2: 736536
80. Rutter, M. 2014. Smart technologies for detecting animal welfare status and delivering health remedies for rangeland systems. RevueScientifique etTechniue Office International des Epizooties, 33: 181–187.
81. Kasper, C.; Ribeiro, D.; De Almeida, A.M.; Larzul, C.; Liaubet, L.; and Murani, E.2020. Omics application in animal science—a special emphasis on stress response and damaging behaviour in pigs. Genes, 11: 920.
82. Yu, K.; Matzapetakis, M.; Horvatic´, A.; Terré, M.; Bach, A.; Kuleš, J.; Yeste, N.; Gómez, N.; Arroyo, L.; Rodríguez-Tomàs, E.and Peña R. 2020. Metabolome and proteome changes in skeletal muscle and blood of pre-weaning calves fed leucine and threonine supplemented diets. Journal of Proteome research, 216:103677.
83. Marco-Ramell, A.; de Almeida, A.M.; Cristobal, S.; Rodrigues, P.; Roncada, and P.; Bassols, A.2016. Proteomics and the search for welfare and stress biomarkers in animal production in the one-health context. Molecular BioSystems, 12: 2024–2035.
84. Almeida,A.M.; Zachut,M.; HernándezCastellano,L.E.; Šperanda,M.; Gabai,G.; Mobasheri,A. 2019. Biomarkers of fitness and welfare in dairy animals: Healthy living. Journal of Dairy Research, 86: 379–387.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
