Harnessing Natural Ingestive Behaviours of Dairy Animals for Improving their Productivity and Welfare

Authors

  • Chander Datt Animal Nutrition Division,ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
  • Sunil Dutt Livestock Production and Management Department, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
  • Sanjay Choudhary Livestock Production and Management Department, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
  • Sunita Animal Nutrition Division,ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
  • Didel Animal Nutrition Division,ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
  • Parteek Singh Animal Nutrition Division, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India
  • Somesh Gaikwad Animal Nutrition Division,ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal-132001, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijapm.2024.40.SI.9

Keywords:

ingestive behaviour, dairy cattle, productivity, welfare

Abstract

The knowledge of ingestive behaviour of  cows and buffaloes is very important in improving  cow wellbeing and performance. The ingestive  behaviour of bovines has been classified into  sucking behaviour, feeding, rumination and water  drinking. Natural suckling performed for a total  duration of one hour daily on an average for 5-8  times in a day is of great importance for the proper  nourishment, health and welfare of calves.  Deprivation of suckling has detrimental effect both  of the mother and calves especially in native breeds  of cows and buffaloes. Feeding both grazing and  stall-feeding duration, frequency, the circadian  patterns of grazing and feeding determine the feed  intake and hence the production of the animals.  Similarly, rumination which completes the process  of feed ingestion, its duration, and frequency is  important for proper feed utilization and hence  animal performance. Length of manger space  available and partioning of manger for individual  cows helps reduce the competition at manger and  thus improves animal productivity. Availability,  temperature and quality of water for the drinking of  cows and buffaloes are the important  considerations for that improving water intake. This  paper reviews the available literature on the  ingestive behaviour especially of native cattle and  buffaloes and discusses how this knowledge can be  utilized for improving the production and welfare of  these animals. 

References

Albright, J.L. and Arave, C.W., 1997. The Behaviour of Cattle. CAB International.

Allen, M.S. (1997). Relationship between fermentation acid production in the rumen and the requirement for physically effective fiber. J. Dairy Sci. 80:1447-1462.

Beauchemin, K.A., L. Eriksen, P., Norgaard, and Rode, L.M. (2008). Short Communication: Salivary secretion during meals in lactating dairy cattle. 91: 2077-2081.

Behra, Kumaresh (2008). Behavioural Patterns Of Murrah Buffaloes Under Organic System Of Management (M.VSc. Thesis). National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.

Dado, R.G. and Allen. M.S. (1994). Variation in and relationships among feeding, chewing, and drinking variables for lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 77:132-144.

DeVries, A.C., Glasper, E.R. and Detillion, C.E., 2003. Social modulation of stress responses. Physiology & Behavior. 79(3): 399- 407.

DeVries, T.J., von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. and Weary, D.M. (2004). Effect of feeding space on the inter cow distance, aggression, and feeding behavior of free-stall housed lactating dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 87: 1432–1438.

DeVries, T.J. and. von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2005). Time of feed delivery affects the feeding and

lying patterns of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 88:625- 631.

Friend, T.H., Polan, C.E. and McGilliard, M.L., 1977. Free Stall and Feed Bunk Requirements Relative to Behavior, Production and Individual Feed Intake in Dairy Cows1. J. Dairy Sci. 60 (1):108-116.

Gibb, M.J., Huckle, C.A. and Nuthall, R., 2002. Effects of level of concentrate supplementation on grazing behaviour and performance by lactating dairy cows grazing continuously stocked grass swards. Anim. Sci. 74 (2): 319-

335.

Grant, R.J., and Albright J.L. (2001). Effect of animal grouping on feeding behavior and intake of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 84: 156-163.

Hafez, E. S. E. and Bouissou, M. F. (1975). The behaviour of cattle. In: The behaviour of Domestic Animals. 3rd edn. (Ed.: E. S. Hafez), pp. 203-245.

Hosseinkhani, A., DeVries, T.J., Proudfoot, K.L., Valizadeh, R., Veira, D.M. and von Keyserlingk, M.A.G., 2008. The effects of feed bunk competition on the feed sorting behavior of close-up dry cows. J. Dairy Sci. 91(3): 1115-

1121.

Huzzey, J.M., DeVries, T.J., Valois, P., and Keyserlingk, M.A.G., (2006). Stocking density and feed barrier design affect the feeding and social behavior of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 89: 126-133.

Joshi, Rahul. (2014). Studies on performance and behaviour of crossbred cows housed under an improved loose housing system (M.VSc. Thesis). ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.

Kamboj, M.L. and Srivastava A. K. (2017). Status Paper On Strategies For Ensuring Proper Milk Ejection In Indigenous Cows And Buffaloes. NDRI Publication No. 148/2017.pp 32.

Kumar Amit. (2016). Evaluation of Performance and Behaviour of Murrah Buffaloes under Improved Shelter System (M.VSc. thesis). ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.

Kumar, C. and Kamboj, M.L. (2013). Effect of fence line feeding on the behaviour and performance of lactating crossbred cows. Indian Journal of Animal Research, 47 (10): 439-442

Lindström, T., and Redbo. I. (2000). Effect of feeding duration and rumen fill on behaviour in

dairy cows. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 70: 83-97.

Manson, F.J. and Appleby, M.C. (1990). Spacing of dairy cows at a food trough. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 26: 69-81.

Mentink, R.L. and Cook, N. B. (2006). Feed bunk utilization in dairy cows housed with either two or three rows of free stalls. J. Dairy Sci. 89: 134- 138.

Menzi, W., Jr. and Chase, L.E. (1994). Feeding behavior of cows housed in free stall barns. In: Dairy Systems for the 21st Century. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, MI. pp 829-831.

Olsson, J., Magnusson, M., and Ventorp, M (2005). The effect of the passage flooring in cubicle houses on the behavioural time-budget of dairy cows. In: “Proc.12th ISAH Congress on Animal Hygiene”, Warsaw, Poland, pp 140-143.

Orr, R.J., Rutter, S.M., Penning, P.D and. Rook. A.J. 2001. Matching grass supply to grazing patterns for dairy cows. Grass Forage Sci. 56: 352-361.

Phillips, C.J.C., and Rind, M.I. (2001a). The effects of frequency of feeding a total mixed ration on the production and behavior of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 84:1979-1987.

Phillips, C.J.C., James, N.L. and Nyallu, H.M., 2000. Ruminant nutrition, behaviour and production-The effects of forage supplements on the ingestive behaviour and production of dairy cows grazing ryegrass only or mixed ryegrass and white clover. Animal Science. 70(3): 555-560.

Sahu, Mamta. (2018). Effect Of Frequency Of Feeding Colostrum And Milk On The Health And Growth Performance Of Crossbred Dairy Calves (M.VSc. Thesis). ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal, Haryana, India.

Shabi, Z., Bruckental, I., Zamwell, S., Tagari, H. and Arieli, A. (1999). Effects of extrusion of grain and feeding frequency on rumen fermentation, nutrient digestibility, and milk yield and composition in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 82:1252-

1260.

Singh, P.K., Kamboj, M.L., Chandra, S. and Kumar, R. (2017). Effect of calf suckling dummy calf used and weaning on milk ejection stimuli and milk yield of Murrah buffaloes (Bubalus bubalis). J. Pharmacognosy Phytochem. SPI: 1012-1015.

Singh, S.S., Ward, W.R., Lautenbach, K., Hughes,

J.W. and Murray, R.D. (1993a). Behaviour of first lactation and adult dairy cows while housed and at pasture and its relationship with sole lesions. Vet. Rec. 133: 469-474.

Sinha, Ranjana. (2015). Effect Of Modified Housing System On Performance And Behaviour Of Crossbred Cow During Hot Humid And Autumn Season (M.VSc. Thesis). ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Karnal,Haryana, India.

Smijisha A.S. and Kamboj, M.L. 2012. Colostrum intake of weaned buffalo calves reared under different management practices. Tamil Nadu J. Vet. Sci. 8 (1): 42-44.

Tucker, C.B., Weary, D.M. de Passille, A.M. Campbell, B. and Rushen, J. (2006). Flooring in front of the feed bunk affects feeding behavior and use of free stalls by dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 89: 2065-2071.

von Keyserlingk, M.A. and Weary, D.M., 2010. Feeding behaviour of dairy cattle: Measures and applications. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 90(3): 303-309.

Galli, J.R.; Cangiano, C.A.; Pece, M.A.; Larripa, M.J.; Milone, D.H.; Utsumi, S.A.; Laca, E.A. (2018). Monitoring and assessment of ingestive chewing sounds for prediction of herbage intake rate in grazing cattle. Animal. 12, 973-982.

Fischer, A.J.; Song, Y.; He, Z.; Haines, D.M.; Guan, L.L.; Steele, M.A. Effect of delaying colostrum feeding on passive transfer and intestinal bacterial colonization in neonatal male Holstein calves. J. Dairy Sci. 2018, 101, 3099-3109.

Edwards, S.A. The behaviour of dairy cows and their newborn calves in individual or group housing.(1983). Appl. Anim. Ethol. 191-198.

Proudfoot, K.L.; Jensen, M.B.; Weary, D.M.; Von Keyserlingk, M.A.G. (2014). Dairy cows seek isolation at calving and when ill. J. Dairy Sci. 97: 2731–2739.

Jensen, M.B.; Rørvang, M.V. (2018). The degree of visual cover and location of birth fluids affect dairy cows’ choice of calving site. J. Dairy Sci. 10: 9483–9492.

Rørvang, M.V.; Herskin, M.S.; Jensen, M.B. (2018). The motivation-based calving facility: Social and cognitive factors influence isolation seeking behaviour of Holstein dairy cows at calving. 13: 0191128.

Zobel, G.; Proudfoot, K.; Cave, V.; Huddart, F.; Webster, J. (2020). The Use of Hides during and after Calving in New Zealand Dairy Cows.

Animals. 10: 2255.

Lidfors, L.M.; Moran, D.; Jung, J.; Jensen, P.; Castren, H. (1994). Behaviour at calving and choice of calving place in cattle kept in different environments. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 42, 11-

28.

Rørvang, M.V.; Nielsen, B.L.; Herskin, M.S.; Jensen, M.B. (2018b). Prepartum maternal behavior of domesticated cattle: A comparison with managed, feral, and wild ungulates. Front. Vet. Sci. 5: 45.

Provolo, G.; Riva, E. (2009). One Year Study of Lying and Standing Behaviour of Dairy Cows in a Frestall Barn in Italy. J. Agric. Eng. 40: 27–34.

Lokhorst, C.; De Mol, R.M.; Kamphuis, C. (2019). Invited Review: Big Data in Precision Dairy Farming. Animal. 13: 15191528.

Beauchemin, K.A. (2018). Invited review: current perspectives on eating and rumination activity in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 101:4762-84.

Published

2024-10-17

How to Cite

Harnessing Natural Ingestive Behaviours of Dairy Animals for Improving their Productivity and Welfare . (2024). Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management, 40(Special Issue), 68–75. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijapm.2024.40.SI.9