Effect of Stocking Density on Skeletal Development of Turkey Poults

Authors

  • R SIROHI Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura
  • P K SHUKLA Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura
  • R P PANDEY Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura
  • A BHATTACHARYYA Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura
  • Y SINGH Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura
  • D N SINGH Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura
  • A KUMAR Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura
  • MAMTA Department of Livestock Production Management, College of Veterinary Science and Animal Husbandry, DUVASU, Mathura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijapm.2023.37.3.14

Keywords:

Turkey,, stocking density, femur, tibia

Abstract

Stocking density is one of the important aspects of housing management. Increased stocking density  can influence the skeletal development of broilers negatively and can increase the leg abnormalities  thereby generating welfare issue for the same. To study the effect of stocking density, an experiment  was conducted at poultry farm, DUVASU, Mathura. Week old turkey poults were distributed randomly  on uniform body weight basis in three treatment groups- T-1: standard stocking density (2.5 ft2 per  bird); T-2: high stocking density (1.25 ft2 per bird) and T-3: low stocking density (5 ft2 per bird). Tibia  and femur were separated from the sacrificed birds and dried in oven at 1050C for 72 hours. There  after cooling down to room temperature, the bones were weighed. Digital radiographs of the bones  were taken. The dimensions and thickness of the bones were measured. Average femur length was  found to be significantly higher (p<0.01) in standard and high SD treatments than the low SD  treatment. Radiographic density of Tibia medulla was found to be significantly higher (p<0.01) in low  SD treatment than the other two SD treatments.  

References

Duncan, D.B. 1955. Multiple Range and Multiple F-Tests. Biometrics. 11, 1.

Edriss MA, Davoodvandi S, Pourreza J. 2003. The effect of stock density on the production of performance and carcass traits in broiler chickens. In Proceedings of the XVIth European symposium on the quality of poultry meat, Saint Brienc, France p.p. 695.

Glatz P, Rodda B. 2013. Turkey farming: Welfare and husbandry issues. African Journal of agricultural Research. 8(48).6149.

Grashorn M A, Kutritz B. 1991. Effect of stocking density on performance of modern broiler breeds. Arch. Geflugelkd, 55. 84.

Hall AL. 2001. The effect of stocking density on the welfare and behaviour of broiler chickens reared commercially. Animal welfare. 10.23.

Jankowski, J., Mikulski, D., Tatara, M.R. and Krupski, W., 2015. Effects of increased stocking density and heat stress on growth, performance, carcase characteristics and skeletal properties in turkeys. Veterinary Record. 176(1).21.

Mahl CRW, Tonietto A, Giorgi BG, Girotto CV, Fontanella VRC. 2009. Evaluation of radiographic density and proportion of trabecular bone in the femur of female rats medicated with glucocorticoid and bisphosphonate. Revista odonto ciência :24(1).28.

Marchewka, J., Watanabe, T.T.N., Ferrante, V. and Estevez, I., 2013. Review of the social and environmental factors affecting

the behavior and welfare of turkeys (Meleagris gallopavo). Poultry Science. 92(6).1467.

Martrenchar, A., Huonnic, D., Cotte, J.P., Boilletot, E. and Morisse, J.P., 1999. Influence of stocking density on behavioural, health and productivity traits of turkeys in large flocks. British poultry science. 40(3).323.

Mcllroy SG, Goodall EA, McMurray CH. 1987. A contact dermatitis of broiler, Epidemiological findings. Avian Pathology. 16.93.

NRC. 1994. Nutrient requirements of poultry. 9th Edition. National Academy of Science. Washington, DC.

Proudfoot FG, Hulan HW, Dewitt WF. 1979. Response of turkey broilers to different stocking densities, lighting treatments, toe clipping and intermingling the sexes. Poultry Science. 58.28.

Sanotra GS, Lawson LG, Vestergaard KS. 2001. Influence of stocking density on tonic immobility, lameness and tibial dischondroplasia in broilers. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science. 4.71.

SCAHAW, 2000. The welfare of chickens kept for meat production (broilers). Scientific Committee in Animal Health and Animal Welfare. European Commission, Health and Consumer Protection Directorate General, Brussels, Belgium. Adopted 21 March 2000 http://europa.eu.int/comm/dg24/health/sc/sc ah/index_en.html

Scheibel PC, Ramos AL, Iwaki LCV, Micheletti KR. 2014. Analysis of correlation between initial alveolar bone density and apical root resorption after 12 months of orthodontic treatment without extraction. Dental Press Journal Orthod. 19(5).97.

Skrbic Z, Pavlovski Z, Lukic M. 2006. Possibility of improvement of certain slaughter traits by reducing the density of housing of broiler chickens. XII European Poultry conference. Verona, Italy 10-14 September. Worlds Poultry Science Journal. Book of abstracts 62.673.

Skrbic Z, Pavlovski Z, Lukic M. 2007. Body mass and dynamics of growth of broiler

chickens of different genotype in improved rearing conditions. In Proceedings of 2nd International Congress on Animal Husbandry “New Perspectives and Challenges of Sustainable Livestock Farming”. Belgrade, October 3-5, Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry. 23, 5-6, book 2, 347.

Skrbic Z, Pavlovski Z, Lukic M. 2009. Stocking density - Factor of production performance, quality and broiler welfare. Biotechnology in Animal Husbandry, 25(5-

.359.

Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. 1994. Statistical methods. 8th Ed. The IOWA State University Press, Ames, Iowa.

Thomas DG, Ravindran V, Thomas DV, Camden BJ, Cottam YH, Morel PC, Cook CJ. 2004. Influence of stocking density on the performance, carcass characteristics and selected welfare indicators of broiler chickens. New Zealand Veterinary Journal, 52.76.

Weeks CA, Danbury Jd, Davies HC, Hunt P, Kestin SC. 2000. The behavior of broiler chickens and its modification by lameness. Applied Animal Behavior Science, 67.111.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-29

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 3 (2023): Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management (Jul-Sep )

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Effect of Stocking Density on Skeletal Development of Turkey Poults . (2024). Indian Journal of Animal Production and Management, 39(3), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijapm.2023.37.3.14
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC