Influence of weed control treatments on available soil nutrient and plant growth parameters of guava (Psidium guajava L.)

Authors

  • Pooja Department of Horticulture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar Author
  • R K Goyal Department of Horticulture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar Author
  • Mukesh Kumar Department of Horticulture, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ijah.2022.4.1.4

Keywords:

Herbicides, guava, weed free, soil nutrients, leaf area

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of different weed control methods on soil  health and growth parameters in guava cultivation. In this study, 9 years old guava  plants of cultivar L-49 at CCSHAU, Hisar were selected during the years 2019-20 and  2020-21. A total of twenty-one treatments were applied on guava trees. Soil and leaf  nutrient levels were assessed along with growth parameters including plant height,  canopy spread, chlorophyll content anwwd leaf area. Among herbicides, glyphosate  (1.26 kg/ha) + carfentrazone (20 g/ha) resulted in the highest levels of N (261.77  and 263.86 kg/ha), Zn (6.79 and 6.80 mg/kg), and Fe (2.26 and 2.28 mg/kg) and  glyphosate (1.26 kg/ha) + oxyfluorfen (100 g/ha) led to the maximum levels of P  (30.20 and 31.27 kg/ha) and K (298.67 and 299.66 kg/ha) respectively. The maximum  leaf area (52.21 cm² and 54.56 cm²) and the greatest increase in plant spread (ranging  from 6.12% to 7.15%) were recorded in the treatment with glyphosate (1.26 kg/ ha) combined with carfentrazone (20 g/ha). The highest increases in plant height  were observed with the application of glyphosate (1.26 kg/ha) combined with  carfentrazone (20 g/ha) and glyphosate (1.26 kg/ha) combined with oxyfluorfen (100  g/ha), with percentage increases ranging from 6.91% to 7.05% and 6.90% to 7.07%,  respectively. Additionally, manual weeding and mulching also resulted in better  growth parameters, including increased plant height and canopy spread

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abouziena, H.F. and Haggag, W.M. 2016. Weed control in clean agriculture: A review. Planta Daninha, 34(2): 377-392. Anonymous 2020. Second advance estimate. National Horticulture Board, Government of India, Gurgaon, Haryana, India. Ashiq, M., Sattar, A., Ahmed, N. and Muhammad, N. 2007. Role of herbicides in crop production. Unique enterprises 17-A, Gul berg colony, Faisalabad, Pakistan.

Banaszkiewicz, T. and Kopytowski, J. 2003. Some aspects of gly phosate use in apple orchards. Sodininkyste ir Darzininkyste, 22: 41-46.

Bond, W. and Grundy, A. C. 2001. Non-chemical weed manage ment in organic farming systems. Weed Research, 41: 383-405. Cerda, J.J., Mendoza, M., Santiago, J., Nieto, F. and Cortez, S. 1999. Weed chemical control in apple (Pyrus malus L.) coadjuvants. Agronomia Mesoamericana, 10(1): 7-15.

Chatha, R.P.S. and Chanana, Y.R. 2007. Studies on weed manage ment in young peach orchards. Indian Journal of Horticulture, 64: 300-303.

Hanway, J.J. and Heidel, H.H. 1952. Soil analysis methods as used in Iowa State College, Soil Testing Laboratory. Iowa State Col lege Bull., 57: 1-131.

Lindsay, W.L. and Norvell, W.A. 1978. Development of a DTPA soil test for zinc, iron, manganese and copper. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 42: 421-28.

Merfield, C. N. 2013. False and stale seedbeds: The most effective non-chemical weed management tools for cropping and pas ture establishment. Lincoln: The BHU Future Farming Centre, 23.

Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A. 1954. Esti mation of available phosphorus in soils by extraction with so dium bicarbonate. United States Department of Agriculture, Washington, 939.

Palma, L., Novello, V., Montemurro, P. and Gisell, A. 2002. Eco logical and agronomic response of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Italia to different techniques of soil management. Italus Hortus, 9(4): 15-22.

Pathak, S.M., Singh, D.K. and Singh, V.K. 2007. Effect of herbicides on growth, weed infestation and physio-biochemical chang es in guava (Psidium guajava L.) seedling. Acta Horticulturae, 735: 315-320.

Sawhney, V. and Singh, D.P. 2002. Effect of chemical desiccation at the post-anthesis stage on some physiological and biochemical changes in the flag leaf of contrasting wheat genotypes. Field Crops Research, 77(1): 1-6.

Soni, J.K., Amarjeet, Punia, S.S. and Choudhary, V.K. 2021. Her bicide combinations for management of resistance in Phalaris minor. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 53(1): 41-48.

Soni, J.K., Nibhoria A., Punia, S.S. and Surbhi, H. 2024. Assessment of herbicide resistance in Phalaris minor and managing clodi

nafop-resistance with alternative herbicides. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 56(2): 142-150

Subbiah, B.V. and Asija, G.L. 1956. A rapid procedure for the de termination of available nitrogen in soils. Current Science, 25: 259-60.

Wright, G.C., McCloskey, W.B. and Taylor, K.C. 2003. Manag ing orchard floor vegetation in flood- irrigated citrus groves. HortTechnology, 13: 668-677.

Downloads

Published

2023-01-30

How to Cite

Influence of weed control treatments on available soil nutrient and plant growth parameters of guava (Psidium guajava L.) . (2023). Indian Journal of Arid Horticulture, 4(1&2), 21–27. https://doi.org/10.48165/ijah.2022.4.1.4