Marked By Belief: The Dark Superstition Of Child Branding
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2024.2.2.4Keywords:
Branding in children, Superstition, Child abuse, Therapeutic burnsAbstract
Branding often referred to by local tribal communities as ‘asaeba,’ ‘chapba,’ ‘lachba’ or ‘chenka is the process of inflicting burns on the skin of a living being. The act of branding in children, particularly as part of a superstitious belief, is harmful and unethical. It is essential to emphasize that branding or marking children can have severe physical and psychological consequences. Such actions are generally not supported by ethical or legal standards and can lead to serious harm to the child’s well-being. Two distinct cases were brought to the Pediatric Trauma and Emergency Department at the tertiary care center of Raipur: one involving a history of loss of consciousness, and the other presenting with seizures, both accompanied by multiple burn wounds over the body. Clinical forensic medicine unit consultation was sought in view of the unusual presentation of burn wounds, which upon detailed evaluation was found to be branding, a superstitious practice in villages with an intention to cure the disease. The act of branding as part of a superstitious belief is a culturally specific practice that can vary widely across societies and communities. It is crucial to approach these topics with cultural sensitivity and understanding of human rights and child welfare. A differential diagnosis of child abuse should be considered when dealing with such cases.
Downloads
References
Jena S, Sahoo K, Modak B, Epari V, Satpathy S, Kaur H, et al. An ethnographic approach to understand the cultural per spectives of tribes on branding practices for sick children in Odisha, India. Indian J Med Res. 2022;156(2):357.
2. Patra PK. Branding in children: a barbaric practice still ex ists in India. Pan Afr Med J [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Sep 12];23. Available from: http://www.panafrican-med-journal. com/content/article/23/62/full/
3. Bastug O, Korkmaz L, Korkut S, Halis H, Gunes T, Kurtoglu S. A harmful traditional practice in newborns with adreno corticotropic hormone resistance syndrome: branding. Türk Pediatri Arş. 2016 Dec 26;51(4):224–7.
4. Mahant S, Reddy C, Mahant S, Singh M. Hot iron rodsbranding, its complications: Still continue in central India.
CHRISMED J Health Res. 2017;4(4):264.
5. P.J. H. Branding in Children- A Cross Sectional Study at a Ter
tiary Care Rural Hospital. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2020 Jan
7;7(2):60–3.
6. Raza S, Mahmood K, Hakeem A, Polsky S, Haemel A, Rai S, et
al. Adverse clinical sequelae after skin branding: a case series.
J Med Case Reports. 2009 Dec;3(1):25.
7. Butchart A, Harvey AP. WHO and International Society for
Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Preventing child mal
treatment: a guide to taking action and generating evidence.
Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.
8. Adhisivam B, Gowtham R. Branding treatment of children in rural India should be banned. BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):481.
9. Karamanoukian R, Ukatu C, Lee E, Hyman J, Sundine M, Ko bayashi M, et al. Aesthetic Skin Branding: A Novel Form of Body Art with Adverse Clinical Sequela: J Burn Care Res. 2006 Jan;27(1):108–10.