Marked By Belief: The Dark Superstition Of Child Branding

Authors

  • Gowri Gopal V R 1Junior resident, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur.
  • Krishnadutt Chavali 2Professor and Head, Department of Forensic Medicine and dhToxicology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Raipur.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2024.2.2.4

Keywords:

Branding in children, Superstition, Child abuse, Therapeutic burns

Abstract

Branding often referred to by local tribal communities as ‘asaeba,’ ‘chapba,’ ‘lachba’  or ‘chenka is the process of inflicting burns on the skin of a living being. The act of  branding in children, particularly as part of a superstitious belief, is harmful and  unethical. It is essential to emphasize that branding or marking children can have  severe physical and psychological consequences. Such actions are generally not  supported by ethical or legal standards and can lead to serious harm to the child’s  well-being. Two distinct cases were brought to the Pediatric Trauma and Emergency  Department at the tertiary care center of Raipur: one involving a history of loss of  consciousness, and the other presenting with seizures, both accompanied by multiple  burn wounds over the body. Clinical forensic medicine unit consultation was sought  in view of the unusual presentation of burn wounds, which upon detailed evaluation  was found to be branding, a superstitious practice in villages with an intention to  cure the disease. The act of branding as part of a superstitious belief is a culturally specific practice  that can vary widely across societies and communities. It is crucial to approach these  topics with cultural sensitivity and understanding of human rights and child welfare.  A differential diagnosis of child abuse should be considered when dealing with such  cases. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Jena S, Sahoo K, Modak B, Epari V, Satpathy S, Kaur H, et al. An ethnographic approach to understand the cultural per spectives of tribes on branding practices for sick children in Odisha, India. Indian J Med Res. 2022;156(2):357.

2. Patra PK. Branding in children: a barbaric practice still ex ists in India. Pan Afr Med J [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2024 Sep 12];23. Available from: http://www.panafrican-med-journal. com/content/article/23/62/full/

3. Bastug O, Korkmaz L, Korkut S, Halis H, Gunes T, Kurtoglu S. A harmful traditional practice in newborns with adreno corticotropic hormone resistance syndrome: branding. Türk Pediatri Arş. 2016 Dec 26;51(4):224–7.

4. Mahant S, Reddy C, Mahant S, Singh M. Hot iron rodsbranding, its complications: Still continue in central India.

CHRISMED J Health Res. 2017;4(4):264.

5. P.J. H. Branding in Children- A Cross Sectional Study at a Ter

tiary Care Rural Hospital. J Evid Based Med Healthc. 2020 Jan

7;7(2):60–3.

6. Raza S, Mahmood K, Hakeem A, Polsky S, Haemel A, Rai S, et

al. Adverse clinical sequelae after skin branding: a case series.

J Med Case Reports. 2009 Dec;3(1):25.

7. Butchart A, Harvey AP. WHO and International Society for

Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Preventing child mal

treatment: a guide to taking action and generating evidence.

Geneva: World Health Organization; 2006.

8. Adhisivam B, Gowtham R. Branding treatment of children in rural India should be banned. BMJ. 2005 Feb 26;330(7489):481.

9. Karamanoukian R, Ukatu C, Lee E, Hyman J, Sundine M, Ko bayashi M, et al. Aesthetic Skin Branding: A Novel Form of Body Art with Adverse Clinical Sequela: J Burn Care Res. 2006 Jan;27(1):108–10.

Published

2025-01-14

How to Cite

Marked By Belief: The Dark Superstition Of Child Branding . (2025). Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 22(2), 15-18. https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2024.2.2.4