Assessing Alternative Specimens for Toxicological Analysis: A Review

Authors

  • Annwesha Mazumdar MSc Forensic Science, Former Internee, Regional Forensic Science Laboratory, Durgapur, West Bengal, India
  • Arpan Kumar Pan Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Maharishi Markandeshwar Institute of Medical Sciences and Research, Mullana (Ambala), Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2024.22.1.2

Keywords:

Alternative specimens, forensic toxicology, skeletal tissue, vitreous humor, drug-facilitated sexual assault

Abstract

The use of alternative matrices in toxicological analyses has increased in forensic  toxicological analysis. Alternative samples to blood, visceral organs, and urine are  useful for reliability and comprehensiveness regarding generating toxicological  profiles. The article critically reviews recent literature on alternative matrices like  oral fluid, hair, skeletal tissue, sweat, cerebrospinal fluid, meconium, breast milk,  and vitreous humor and their applications in forensic toxicology. It analyzes the  characteristics, advantages, limitations, and applications of alternative matrices in  drug and poison analysis. This review article further discusses the characteristics  of biological matrices used in forensic analyses as substitutes for whole blood,  urine, and viscera samples. Each matrix type has advantages regarding sampling,  preservation, extraction methods, detection time frame, drug levels, and other  factors. However, these matrices also have limitations, such as limited drug  incorporation, correlation with concentrations for effects, low xenobiotic levels,  and the need for proper sample preparation and analysis. Although there is data  on detecting traditional drugs of abuse in alternative matrices, information on the  detection of emerging illicit drugs in these matrices is scarcer. Alternative biological  specimens play a crucial role in forensic toxicology, but they come with distinct  limitations and characteristics that must be considered. The results from analyzing  these samples may differ based on the type of specimen. Alternative matrices will  remain a focus in forensic toxicology due to their benefits and potential use when  blood, urine, or visceral organs are inaccessible or impractical, particularly in cases  like drug-facilitated sexual assault, burnt bodies, or decomposed remains. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Singh Z. Forensic toxicology: biological sampling and use of different analytical techniques. Forensic Res Criminol Int J. 2017;4(4):117-20.

Gallardo E, Queiroz J. The role of alternative specimens in toxicological analysis. Biomed Chromatogr. 2008;22(8):795-821.

Frederick DL. Toxicology testing in alternative specimen matrices. Clin Lab Med. 2012;32(3):467-92.

Pedersen AML, Belstrøm D. The role of natural salivary defences in maintaining a healthy oral microbiota. J Dent. 2019;80

.McKie A, Vyse A, Maple C. Novel methods for the detection of microbial antibodies in oral fluid. Lancet Infect Dis. 2002;2(1):18-24.

Cone EJ, Huestis MA. Interpretation of oral fluid tests for drugs of abuse. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007;1098(1):51-103.

Costa BRB da, Santos Júnior WJR, Maximiano IF, Gomes NC, Freitas BT, De Martinis BS. Application of microextraction techniques in alternative biological matrices with focus on forensic toxicology: a review. Bioanalysis. 2021;13(1):45-64.

da Cunha KF, Oliveira KD, Huestis MA, Costa JL. Screening of 104 new psychoactive substances (NPS) and other drugs of abuse in oral fluid by LC-MS/MS. J Anal Toxicol. 2020;44(7):697-707.

Bessonneau V, Boyaci E, Maciazek-Jurczyk M, Pawliszyn J. In vivo solid-phase microextraction sampling of human saliva for non-invasive and on-site monitoring. Anal Chim Acta. 2015;856:35-45.

Sperling LC. Hair anatomy for the clinician. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1991;25(1):1-17.Araújo R, Fernandes M, Cavaco-Paulo A, Gomes A. Biology of human hair: know your hair to control it. Biofunctionalization of Polymers and their Applications. 2011;121-43.

Kintz P, Salomone A, Vincenti M. Hair analysis in clinical and forensic toxicology. Academic Press; 2015 June 25.

de Campos EG, da Costa BRB, Dos Santos FS, Monedeiro F, Alves MNR, Santos Junior WJR, et al. Alternative matrices in forensic toxicology: a critical review. Forensic Toxicol. 2022;40(1):1-18.

Bouabbache S, Pouradier F, Panhard S, Chaffiotte C, Loussouarn G. Exploring some characteristics (density, anagen ratio, growth rate) of human body hairs: variations with skin sites, gender and ethnics. Int J Cosmet Sci. 2019;41(1):46-54.

Kintz P. Hair analysis in forensic toxicology. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Forensic Sci. 2019;1(1)

Yamada J, Stevens B, de Silva N, Gibbins S, Beyene J, Taddio A, et al. Hair cortisol as a potential biologic marker of chronic stress in hospitalized neonates. Neonatology. 2007;92(1):42-9.

Pragst F, Balikova MA. State of the art in hair analysis for detection of drug and alcohol abuse. Clin Chim Acta. 2006;370(1-2):17-49.

Palamar JJ, Le A, Guarino H, Mateu-Gelabert P. A comparison of the utility of urine and hair testing in detecting self-reported drug use among young adult opioid users. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2019;200:161-7.

Travlos GS. Normal structure, function, and histology of the bone marrow. Toxicol Pathol. 2006;34(5):548-65.

Vandenbosch M, Rooseleers L, Van Den Bogaert W, Wuestenbergs J, Van de Voorde W, Cuypers E. Skeletal tissue, a viable option in forensic toxicology? A view into post mortem cases. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;309:110225.

Telano LN, Baker S. Physiology, Cerebral Spinal Fluid. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2023. PMID: 30085549.

Huff T, Tadi P, Weisbrod LJ, Varacallo M. Neuroanatomy, Cerebrospinal Fluid. In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL); 2023. PMID: 29262203.

Guyton AC. Textbook of medical physiology. 11th ed. China: Elsevier Saunders; 2006.

Wachholz P, Skowronek R, Pawlas N. Assessing the applicability of cerebrospinal fluid collected from the spinal cord for the determination of ethyl alcohol in postmortem toxicology. Forensic Sci Med Pathol. 2023;19(1):44-9.

Wachholz P, Skowronek R, Pawlas N. Cerebrospinal fluid in forensic toxicology: current status and future perspectives. J Forensic Leg Med. 2021;82:102231.

Corona L, Lussu A, Bosco A, Pintus R, Cesare Marincola F, Fanos V, et al. Human milk oligosaccharides: a comprehensive review towards metabolomics. Children. 2021;8(9):804.

Ramos Santos Jr WJ, De Martinis BS. Psychoactive substances in human breast milk: a review of analytical strategies for their investigation. Bioanalysis. 2020;12(17):1263-74.

Moss MJ, Bushlin I, Kazmierczak S, Koop D, Hendrickson RG, Zuckerman KE, et al. Cannabis use and measurement of cannabinoids in plasma and breast milk of breastfeeding mothers. Pediatr Res. 2021;90(4):861-8.

Piskáčková HB, Nemeškalová A, Kučera R, Pedersen-Bjergaard S, Najmanová V, Štěrbová-Kovaříková P, et al. Advanced microextraction techniques for the analysis of amphetamines in human breast milk and their comparison with conventional methods. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2022;210:114549.

Stoppard M. Complete Baby and Childcare: Everything You Need to Know for the First Five Years. Dorling Kindersley Ltd; 2008.

Woźniak MK, Jaszczak E, Wiergowski M, Polkowska Ż, Namieśnik J, Biziuk M. Meconium analysis as a promising diagnostic tool for monitoring fetal exposure to toxic substances: recent trends and perspectives. Trends Analyt Chem. 2018;109:124-41.

Gray T. Meconium drug testing. In: Levine BS, editor. Principles of Forensic Toxicology. 2020. p. 657-63.

Huestis MA, Choo RE. Drug abuse's smallest victims: in utero drug exposure. Forensic Sci Int. 2002;128(1-2):20-30.

Saito K, Saito R, Kikuchi Y, Iwasaki Y, Ito R, Nakazawa H. Analysis of drugs of abuse in biological specimens. J Health Sci. 2011;57(6):472-87.

López-Rabuñal Á, Di Corcia D, Amante E, Massano M, Cruz-Landeira A, de-Castro-Ríos A, et al. Simultaneous determination of 137 drugs of abuse, new psychoactive substances, and novel synthetic opioids in meconium by UHPLC-QTOF. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2021;413(21):5493-507.

Levine BS. Postmortem Clinical Testing. In: Levine BS, editor. Principles of Forensic Toxicology. 2020. p. 603-8.

Markowska J, Szopa M, Zawadzki M, Piekoszewski W. Vitreous humour: routine or alternative material for analysis in forensic medicine. Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol. 2017;67(3):201-13.

Huestis MA, Oyler JM, Cone EJ, Wstadik AT, Schoendorfer D, Joseph Jr RE. Sweat testing for cocaine, codeine and metabolites by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr B Biomed Sci Appl. 1999;733(1-2):247-64.

Jadoon S, Karim S, Akram MR, Kalsoom Khan A, Zia MA, Siddiqi AR, et al. Recent developments in sweat analysis and its applications. Int J Anal Chem. 2015;2015(1):164974.

Published

2024-10-30

How to Cite

Assessing Alternative Specimens for Toxicological Analysis: A Review. (2024). Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 22(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.48165/iijfmt.2024.22.1.2