Laterality: Coffee vs Tea - Is it forensically relevant?

Authors

  • Munawwar Husain Professor and Chairman,Department of Forensic Medicine, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh-202002, India
  • Arshad Anjum Assistant Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh-202002, India
  • Jawed A Usmani Professor, Department of Forensic Medicine, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, Uttar Pradesh-202002, India
  • Mubarak Alshariam Associate Professor, Department of Pathology, Abha, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Laterality, Left-hander, Right-hander, Forensic relevance

Abstract

The question of laterality is discussed in this paper pertaining to use of the right or the left hand. Interestingly, some amazing cue is derived which though do not confirm to the projection, yet demonstrate conformity to deviant reasoning leading to promising forensic lead. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Touwen BCL. Laterality and dominance. J Dev Med Child Neurol 1972; 14(9): 747

2. Roberts L. Aphasia, apraxia and agnosia in abnormal states of cerebral dominance. In Handbook of Clinical Neurology, vol 4, Vincken, P.J and Bruyn, GW, eds. North Holland, Amsterdam, 1969; 312.

3. Levy J. Possible basis for the evolution of lateral specialization of the human brain. Nature 1969; 224(6): 614.

4. Bakan P. Handedness and birth disorder. Nature 1971; 229(1): 195.

5. Leviton A and Kilty T. Birth order and left-handedness. Arch Neurol 1976; 33(9): 664.

6. Hubbard JI. Handedness not a function of birth order. Nature 1971; 232(7): 276.

7. Leviton A and Kilty T. Birth risk and left-handedness reconsidered. Arch Neurol 1979; 36(2): 119.

Published

2013-07-30

How to Cite

Laterality: Coffee vs Tea - Is it forensically relevant?. (2013). Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 11(1&2), 33–34. https://doi.org/10.48165/