PHOTOGRAPHY & SKETCHING IN FORENSIC PRACTICE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
scientific evidence, countryAbstract
The use of photographs to determine people’s identity has been applied since the middle of the 19th century and included in individual’s criminal and prison records1-3. With the development and establishment of fingerprint technology, fingerprints became more widely used and proved to be more reliable method of identification. However, even today, throughout the world, photographs are still used and are included as part of prisoner’s records. Law agencies universally, routinely use fingerprints and photographs for criminal records. These images commonly referred to as ‘MUG SHOTS’ are characterized by two photographs, one facing directly into the camera and the other a profile. This persistent use of photographs raises the question, as to why photographs are used so commonly when fingerprints are a more reliable source of identification? The answer is quite simple; photographs are used so that a lay person, including police or customs officials, can make cursory identification by comparing the suspect in question with his / her photographs. Fingerprint identification on the other hand, requires a trained and qualified eye viz. a finger print expert4.
Downloads
References
1. Deutch Y. (Ed.) Science against crime. Marshall Cavendid House, 1982
2. Frechette NC. A new Lincolin image: report on an unusual study. J Forensic Ident 1987; 44: 410-429. 3. Romer GB. Artifact description of Kaplan daguerreotype J Forensic Ident 1994; 44: 430-436.
4. Glenn Porter, Greg Doran. An anatomical and photographic technique for forensic facial identification. FSI 2000; 114: 97- 105.
5. Vanezis P, Busuttil A. Suspicious Death Scene Investigation. Arnold Publication 1996; p 1 to 28.
6. Sharma BR, Kapoor K, Singh I, Vij K. Hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy – a silent killer. Journal of Karnataka Medicolegal Society 2001; 10 (2): 55-59
7. Sharma BR, Kapoor K, Singh I, Vij K. Chronic Subdural Haematoma – A Forensic View. Journal of Forensic Medicine &
Toxicology 2000; 17 (2): 13-16.
9. Sharma BR, Vij K, Kumar A. Atrocities on children – To what extent; JAMA (in the press).
10. Tiller N, Tiller T. The power of physical evidence: a capital murder case study. J Forensic Ident 1992; 42 (2): 79.
11. Karazalus CP, Palmbach TM, Lee HC. Digital enhancement of sub-quality bitemark photographs J Forensic Sci 2001; 46 (4): 954-958.
