INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND THE DEBATE ON EUTHANASIA – A VIEWPOINT

Authors

  • BR Sharma MBBS, MD, Reader, Department of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology, Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh – 160030, India Correspondence: Dr. B. R. Sharma, #1156 – B, Sector–32 B, Chandigarh–160030. India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

End of life decisions, Physician-assisted deaths, Physician-assisted suicides, Euthanasia

Abstract

Over the past few years, euthanasia and physician assisted suicide have become prominent public issues in many countries.  Several countries or regions of countries have debated legislation on euthanasia and / or physician assisted suicide. Although  there is growing public acceptance of physician-assisted deaths all over the world; many professional organizations remain  opposed to it. Most of the debates on the issue are usually framed, as issues of morality while many basic empirical questions  remain unanswered. For example, how many patients actually make these requests? Would improved treatment of pain lead  fewer patients to make these requests? How do physicians respond to these requests? To what extent these practices occur? etc.  Can internationalization of the euthanasia debate help to resolve these issues and build the consensus, and can International Human Rights Law provide an adequate basis for such a debate? This paper attempts to examine these questions. Key Words: End of life decisions, Physician-assisted deaths, Physician-assisted suicides, Euthanasia

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1). Vander Maas P J, Vander Wal G.,Haverkate I. Euthanasia, physician assisted suicide and other medical practices involving the end of life in Netherlands, 1990 - 1995; N Eng J Med 1996; 335: 1699 - 705.

2). TenHave HAMJ, Welie JV M. (1996) Euthanasia in Netherlands. Crit Care Clin. 1996; 12: 97 - 108.

3). Vega JM. In Euthanasia - the twenty sixth specialty by Capanna AH, Capanna DM & Bianco RY. Surg Neurol 1998; 50: 97 - 103.

4). Lee MA, Nelson HD, Tilden VP, Ganzini L, Tolle S W.Legalizing Assisted Suicide - Views of physicians in Oregon. N Eng J 16

Med 1996; 334 (5): 310 - 315.

5). Beachemp T L. and Childress J. F. Principles of biomedical ethics, 3rd Ed. 1989, New York Oxford University Press, p 25 - 66.

6). United Nations International Convention on Civil and Political Rights. In: A Compilation of International Instruments. 1994, New York, United Nations, volume 1.

7). Council of Europe, European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. In: European Convention on Human Rights: Collected Texts. 1994, Strasbourg, Council of Europe Press.

8). United Nations General Comment on Article 1. In: International Human Rights Instruments 1994, UNdoc. HRI / GEN / 1 / Rev. 1 nr. 12 p 12 - 14.

9). United Nations General Comment on Article 6. In: International Human Rights Instruments 1994, UN doc. HRI / GEN / 1 / Rev. 1 nr. 20 p 6 - 7.

10). Ramcharan BG. The concept and dimensions of the right to life. In: Ramcharan BG. (Ed.) The Right to Life in International Law 1985, Dordrecht. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers. P 6 - 8.

11). Nowak M. UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. ICCPR Commentary 1993, Kehl am Rhein, NP Engel p 124.

12). United Nations General Comment on Article 7. In: International Human Rights Instruments 1994, UN doc. HRI / GEN / 1 / 1

Rev. 1 nr. 20 p 30 - 33.

3-

S

e

p

2

13). Sharma BR. To legalize physician assisted suicide or not - a dilemma. J Clinical Forensic Medicine 2003; 10 (3): 185 – 190 0

2

4

14). E.q., in re Conroy; 464 A 2d 303; NJ Super. Ct., App. Div., 1983

da

on

15). Terry PB. Euthanasia and Assisted Suicide: Ethics and Politics Chest 1993; 103 (4): 1259-63.

16). Sharma BR, Harish D. Euthanasia - a medical dilemma. Medicolegal Update 2004; 4 (1): 19 - 22. 59.1

17). World Medical Association; International Code of Medical Ethics.

18). Gupta A. To seek death is legal, at last The Tribune, Jan. 1st 2001.

19). Dudgeon v. UK, A 45 1981, para 47.

20). Block S D., Billings J. A. Patient requests to hasten death: evaluation and management in terminal care. Arch Intern Med 1994; 154: 2039 - 2047.

21). Foley K M. Pain, Physician assisted suicide and euthanasia. Pain Forum 1996; 4: 163 - 178.

22). Zylics Z and Janssens M. J. P. A. Options in palliative care: dealing with those who want to die. In: Zenz M (ed.). Cancer Pain, Baillere's Clinical Anasthesiology 1997

23). Hendin H, Ruthenfrans C and Zylicz Z. Physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in the Netherlands: lessons from the Dutch. JAMA 1997; 277: 1720 – 1722

24). Hendin H. Seduced by death 1996; New York/ London. WW Norton and Company.

25). Sharma BR. The end of life decisions: Should physicians aid their patients in dying? J Clin Forensic Med 2004; 11 (3): 133 – 140.

26). Sharma BR. Ethical and practical principles underlying the end of life decision. American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology 2004; 25 (3): 216 – 219.

27). Sharma BR Withholding and withdrawing of life-support - a medicolegal dilemma. Am J Forensic Med Path 2004; 25 (2): 150 – 155.

Published

2006-01-30

How to Cite

INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS LAW AND THE DEBATE ON EUTHANASIA – A VIEWPOINT . (2006). Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 3(3&4), 12–18. https://doi.org/10.48165/