Forensic Anthropology in biological profiling of human skeletal remains

Authors

  • Jagmahender Singh Anthropologist, Dept. of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh 160 030 India
  • B R Sharma Professor, Dept. of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, Govt. Medical College & Hospital, Chandigarh 160 030 India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Forensic anthropology, anthropological analysis

Abstract

The anthropological analysis for biological profiling of the skeletal material from forensic context is of paramount importance and forms a basic step in forensic anthropology. Forensic anthropology is an applied discipline of anthropology wherein standard scientific methods and techniques developed in skeletal biology, osteology and physical anthropology are applied for medico legal purpose. It forms an integral part of identification process as it allows relatively fast and accurate data that could narrow down the investigators search field. Traditional anthropological assessment of biological identity remains an essential component in the process, serving to limit misidentification and provide additional information upon which to base and support positive identification

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Bassed R, Odont DF. Identification of severely incinerated human remains: the need for a co operative approach between forensic specialties (a case report). Med. Sci. Law 2003; 43(4): 356- 61

2. Cattaneo C, Baccino E. A call for forensic anthropology in Europe: the news letter of the International Academy of Legal Medicine. International Journal Legal Medicine 2002;116:N1- N2

3. Albanese A. Metric method for sex determination using the hipbone and the femur. J Forensic Sci 2003; 48(2): 263-267.

4. Rosing FW, Graw M, Marre B, Ritz Timme S, Rothsehild MA, Rotzscher K, Schmeling A, Schroder I, Geserick G. Recommendations fro the forensic diagnosis of sex and age from skeleton, Hum Biol 2007; 58: 75-89.

5. Hunnargi SA, Menezes RG, Kanchan T, Lobo SW ,Binu VS, Uysal S, Kumar HRS, Baral P, Herekas NG, Garg RK. Sexual dimorphism of the human sternum in a Maharashtrian population of India: A morphometric analysis. Legal Medicine 2008; 10 (1): 6 - 10

6. Steyn M, Iscan MY. Osteometric variation in the humerus: sexual dimorphism in South Africans. For Sci Inter 1999; 106: 77-85

7. Saunders S, Hoppa R. Sex determination of human skeleton from long bone measurements (abstract) 42nd Annual CSFS Meeting 1995, Toronto, Ontario, Sept. 26-30 . 8. Slaus M, Tomicic Z. Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary and complete tibiae from medieval Croatian sites. For Sci Int 2005; 147:147-152.

9. Dixit SG, Kakkar S, Aggarwal S, Chaudhary R. Sexing of human hip bone of Indian Origin by discriminant fumation analysis, J Forensic & Legal Med 2007; 14: 429-435 10. Finnegan M. Non-metric variation of the infra-cranial skeleton. J Anatomy 1978; 125:23-37. 11. Kemes-Grottenthaler A. Sex determination by discriminant analysis: an evaluation of the reliability of patella measurements. For Sci Int 2005; 147:129-133

12. Iscan MY. Forensic anthropology of sex and body size. For Sci Int 2005; 147: 107-112. 13. Ditch LE, Ross JC. A multivariate dental sexing technique. Am J Phy Anthropol 1972; 37: 61- 64

14. Loth SR, Henneberg M. Sexually dimorphic mandibular morphology in the first few years of life. Am J Phy Anthropol 2001; 115: 179-186.

15. Coussens A, Anson T, Norris RM, Henneberg M.Sexual dimorphism in the robusticity of long bones of infants and young childern. Anthropol Rev 2002; 65:3-16.

16. Cox M, Mays S. Human osteology in archeology and forensic science, 2000; Medical Media, London Greenwich p 61 - 81

17. Wiredu EK, Kumoji R, Seshadri R, Britiwum RB. Osteometric analysis of sexual dimorphism in the sternal end of the rib in West African population. J For Sci 1999; 44(5): 921-925. 18. Iscan MY. Osteometric analysis of sexual dimorphism in the sternal end of the rib. J For Sci 1985; 30: 1090-99

19. Cologlu AS, Iscan My, Yauvz MF, Sari H. Sex determination from the ribs of contemporary Turks J Forensic Sc 1998; 43: 273-276.

20. Mac Laughlin SM, Oldale KN. Vertebral body diameters and sex prediction. Ann Hum Biol 1992; 19: 285- 292.

21. France DL. Sexual dimorphism in the human humerus. Dissertation University of Colorado Boulder 1983.

22. France DL. Osteometry at muscle origin and insertion in sex determination. Am J Phy Anthropol 1988; 76: 515-26.

23. Holman DJ, Bennett KA. Determination of sex from arm bone measurements. Am J PhysAnthropol 1991; 84(4): 421-426.

24. Iscan MY, Loth SR, King CA, Shihai D, Yoshino M. Sexual dimorphism in the humerus: A comparative analysis of Chinese, Japanese and Thais. Forensic Sci Inter 1998; 98: 17-29 25. Allen JC, Bruce MF, MacLaughlin. Sex determination from the radius in humans. Hum Biol 1987; 2: 373-378.

26. Berrizbeitia EL. Sex determination with the head of the radius J Forensic Sci 1989; 34: 1206- 1213.

27. Scheuer JL, Elkington NM. Sex determination from metacarpals and the first proximal phalanx. J Forensic Sci 1993; 38(4): 769-778.

28. Smith SL. Attribution of foot bones to sex and population groups. J For Sci 1997; 42: 186- 195.

29. Trancho G, Robledo B, Lapez – Bueis I, Sanchez JA. Sexual determination of the femur using discriminant function analysis of a Spanish population of known sex and age. J Forensic Sc 1997; 42: 181-185.

30. Seidemann RM, Stojanowski CM, Doran GH. The use of the siperio-inferior femoral neck diameter as a sex assessor. Am J Phys Anthropol 1998; 107: 305-313.

31. McCormic WF, Stewart JH, Green H. Sexing of human clavicles using length and circumference measurements. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 1991; 12(2): 175-181.

32. Jit I, Jhingan V, Kulkarni M. Sexing the human sternum. Am J Phy Anth 1980; 53: 217-224 33. Selthofer R, Nicolic V, Mrcela T, Radic R, Leksan I, Rudez I, Selthofer K. Morphometric analysis of the sternum. Coll. Antropol 2006; 30(1): 43-47.

34. Holland TD. Sex assessment using the proximal tibia. American J Phy Anthropol 1991; 85: 221-227.

35. Iscan MY, Yoshino M, Kato S. Sex determination from the tibia. J Forensic Sci 1994; 39: 785- 792.

36. Cattaneo C. Forensic anthropology: developments of a classical discipline in the new millennium; Forensic Science International 2007; 165: 185-193.

37. Hu KS, Koh KS, Hein SH, Shin KJ, Kim HJ. Sex determination using non-metric characteristic of mandible in Koreans. J For Sci 2006; 51 (6): 1376 – 82.

38. Case DT, Ross AH. Sex determination forms hand and foot bone. J. Forensic Sci 2007; 52(2): 264-70.

60. Liversidge HM, Lyons F, Hector MP (2003). The accuracy of three methods of age estimates using radiographic measurements of developing teeth. Forensic Sci, Int, 131; 22-29. 61. Backoften WU, Crampe J, Vaupal JW (2004). Tooth cementun annulation for age estimation: result from a large known-age validation study. Am J Phys Anthropol; 123: 119-129. 62. Jankauskas R, Barakaudkas S, Bojarun R. Incremental lines of dental cementum in biological age estimation. Homo 2001; 52: 59-71.

63. Stout SD and Paine RR. Brief communication: histological age estimation wing rib and clavicle. Am J Phy Arithropol 1992; 87: 111-115.

64. Valenzuela A, Martin HS, Mandojana JM, Valenzuela M, Villanuena E. Multiple regression models for age estimation by assessment of morphological dental changes according to teeth source. Am J Forensic Med Pathol 2002; 23: 386-389.

65. Saunders SR, Fitzgerald C, Rogers T, Dudar C, McKillop H. A test of several methods of skeletal age estimation using & domented archaeological sample. Can Soc Forensic Sci J 1992; 2: 97-118.

66. Dorandeu A, Couliboly B, Bartoli C, Gaudart J, Baccino E, Leonetti G, Marti MDP. Age at death estimation based on study of frontosphenoidal suture. Forensic Sci Int 2008; 177(1): 47-51.

67. Murray K. Murray J. A test of the articular surface ageing technique, J Forensic Science 1991; 36: 1162-1169

68. Katz D, Suchey JM. Age estimation of the male os pubis. Am J Phy Anthropol 1986; 69: 427- 435.

69. Katz D, Suchey JM. Race differences in pubic symphyseal aging patterns in the males. Am J Phy Anthropol 1989; 80: 167-172.

70. Krogman WM, Iscan MY. The human skeleton in forensic medicine. 2nd ed. 1986, Springfield; Charles C. Thomas.

71. Loth SR, Iscan MY, Scheuerman EH. Intercostal variations at the sternal end of the rib. Forensic Sci Int 1994; 65: 135 - 143.

72. Iscan MY, Loth SR, Wright. Age estimation from the rib phase analysis in white males. J Forensic Sci 1984; 29: 1094-1104.

73. Schaefer MC. A summary of epiphyscal union timings in Bosnian males. Int J Osteoarchaeol 2008; Article in Press, www.interscience.wiley.com - doi:10.1002/oa.959. 74. Cameriere R, Ferrante L, Mirtella D, Cingolani M. Carpals and epiphyses of radius and ulna as age indicators. Int J Legal Med 2006; 120: 143-146.

75. Schmeling A, Reisinger W, Lareck D, Vendura K, Markus W, Geserick G. Effect of Ethnicity on skeletal maturation-consequences for forensic age estimation. Int J Legal Medicine 2000; 113: 253-258.

76. Schmeling A, Schulz R, Danner B, Raring FW. The impact of economic progress and modernisation in medicine on the ossification of hand and wrist. Int J Legal Med 2006; 120 (2): 121 – 126.

77. Olze A, Schmeling A, Tani Guchi M, Maeda H, Niekark P, Wernecks KD, Geserick G. Forensic age estimation in living subjects. The ethnic factor in wisdom teeth mineralization. Int J Legal Med 2004; 118: 170-173.

78. Cattaneo C. Determining the human origin of fragments of burnt bones – a comprehensive study of histological, immunological and DNA techniques. Forensic Sci Int 1999; 102 (2-3) 181 – 191.

79. Kosa F. Application and role of anthropological research in the practice of forensic medicine. Acta Biologica Szegediensis 2000; 44(1-4): 179- 188.

116 Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology

80. Galloway A, Birkby WH, Kahana T, Fulginiti L. Physical anthropology and the law: legal responsibilities of Forensic Anthropologists. Yearbook of physical anthropology 1990; 33: 39-57.

81. Komar D(2003). Lessons from Srebrenica: the contributions and limitations of physical anthropology in identifying war victims.J. Forensic Sci.;48(4):713-716.

82. Budimlija Z, Mechthild K, Mundraff A, Wiresema J, Bartelink E, MacKinnon G, Nazzaruallo S, Estacio S, Hennessey M, Shaler R. Would Trade Center Human Identification Project experience with individual body identification cases. Great Medical Journal 2003;44(3):259- 265.

39. Ramethaler F, Kreutz K, Verhaff MA. Accuracy of metric sex analysis of remains using Fordise ® based on a recent skull collection. Int J Legal Med 2007; 127: 477-482. 40. Meyer E, Wiese M, Bruchhaus H, Claussen M, Klein A. Extraction and amplification of authentic DNA from ancient human remains. Forensic Sci Int 2000; 113: 87-90. 41. Cattaneo C, Smillie DM, Gelsthorpe K, Pircinni A, Gelsthorpe AR, Sohrol RJ A sample method for isoextracting DNA from old skeletal material. Forensic Science International 1995; 74 (3): 167 – 74.

42. Hagelberg E, Clegg JB (1991). Isolation and characterization of DNA from archaeological bones. Bio Sci 1991; 244: 45-50.

43. Stone AC, Milner GR Paabo S, Stoneking M. Sex determination of ancient human skeletons using DNA American Journal of Physical Anthropology 1996; 99 (2): 231 – 238. 44. Brown K. Ancient DNA application in human osteoarchaeology. In Case M, Mays S eds. Human osleotogy in archaeology and Forensic sciences 2006; London, Greenwich, Medical Media Ltd. P 455-473.

45. Chen X, Zhang Z, Tao L. Determination of male age at death in chinese Han population: using quantitative variables statistical analylsis for pubic bones. Forensic Science International 2008; 175: 3C-43.

46. Coqueugniot H, Weaver TD. Brief Communication: Infracranial maturation in the skeletal collection from Coimbra, Portugal: New Aging standards for epiphyseal union. Am J Phy Anthropology 2007; 134: 424-437.

47. Ritz-Timme S, Cattaneo C, Callins MJ, Waite ER, Schultz HW, Kaatsch HJ, Barrmano HIM. Age estimation: the state of art in relation to the specific demands of forensic practice. International Journal Legal Medicine 2007; 113: 129-136.

48. Schmeling A, Geserick G, Reisinger W, Olze A. Age estimation. For. Sci. Int 2007; 165: 178- 181.

49. Baccino E, Ubeliaker DH, Hayek LC, Zerilli A. Evaluation of seven methods of estimating age at death from mature human skeletal remains. J For Sci 1999; 44 (5): 931-36. 50. Scheuer L. Application of osteology to forensic medicine. Clin Anat 2002; 15: 297- 312. 51. Kurki H. Use of first rib for adult age estimation. A test of one method. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology 2005; 15: 342-350.

52. Ericksen MF. Comparison of two methods of estimating age at death in a Chilean Preceramic population. International Journal Osteoarcheology 1997; 7: 65-70.

53. Mandojana JM, Martin HS, Valenzuela A, Valenzuela M, Luna JD. Differences in morphological age-related dental changes depending upon postmortem interval. J Forensic Sci 2001; 46: 889-892.

54. Kim,YK, Kho HS, Lee KH. Age estimation by occlusal tooth wear. J Forensic Sci 2000; 45: 303-309

55. Scheuer L, Black S. Developmental juvenile osteology 2000; Academic Press. San Diego. 56. Ferembach D, Schwidetzky L, Stloukal M. Recommendations for age and sex diagnosis of skeletons. Journal of Hum Evol 1980; 9: 517-549.

57. Ubelkar DH. Human skeletal remains: excavation, analysis, interpretation. Aldine Publishing Co. 1974; Chicago, Illinois.

58. Schmeling A, Schulz R, Reisinger W, Muhler M, Warneck KD, Godarick G. Studies on the time frame for ossification of the medial clavicular epiphysial cartilage in conventional radiography. Int. J Leg Med 2004; 118(1): 5-8

59. Cardoso HFV. Epiphysial unions at innominate and lower limb in a modern Portuguese skeletal sample and age estimation in adolescent and young adult male and female skeletons Am J Phy Anthropol 2007; 135(2): 161-171.

Djuric Mr Dunjic D, Dynoic D, Skinner M. Identification of victims from two mass-graves in Serbia: A critical evaluation of classical markers of identity. Forensic Sci Int 2007; 172 (2-3): 125-129

84. Stephen CN, Henneberg M. Recognition of forensic facial approximation: case specific examples and empirical tests. Forensic Sci Int 2006; 156(2-3): 182-191.

85. Stephen CN. Do resemblance ratings measure the accuracy of facial approximation? J Forensic Sci 2002; 47 (2): 239 – 243.

86. Kuehn CM, Taylor KM, Mann FA, Wilson AJ, Harruff RC. Validation of chest X-ray comparisons for unknown decedent identification. J Forensic Science 2002; 47(4): 725-729 87. Wlliams WA, Rogers TL. Evaluating the accuracy and precision of cranial morphological traits for sex determination. J Forensic Sci 2006; 5I(4): 729-735.

88. Rogers T, Allard TT. Expert testimony and positive identification of human remains through cranial sutures patterns. J Forensic Sci 2004; 49(2): 203-207.

89. Peterson JL, Murdock JE (1989). Forensic science ethics: developing an integrated system of support and enforcement, J Forensic Sci 1989; 34: 749-762.

Published

2009-01-30

How to Cite

Forensic Anthropology in biological profiling of human skeletal remains. (2009). Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 6(3&4), 114–116. https://doi.org/10.48165/