A Comparative Evaluation of CT Scan Findings and Autopsy Findings in Fatal Head Injury Cases
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
CT scan, autopsy, head injury, skull fractures, intracranial haemorrhage, traumatic brain injuryAbstract
A study titled ‘A comparative evaluation of computed tomography (CT) scan findings and autopsy findings in fatal head injury cases’ was carried out in the Department of Forensic Medicine, M.S. Ramaiah Medical College, Bangalore, from October 2009 to March 2011 over a period of 18 months to correlate autopsy findings with CT scan findings in fatal head injury cases. All fatal cases of head injury subjected for post-mortem examination, where ante-mortem CT scan reports were available, were taken up for study. Post-mortem examination of each case was carried out and various types of head injuries were recorded and photographed and the respective CT scan reports were collected. Further, a comparative evaluation of post-mortem findings with that of the CT scan reports was analysed. Of the 270 cases of head injury, 44 (16 %) were hospitalised and a CT scan-head was done. In 37 cases (84%), skull fractures were observed at autopsy, whereas in only 20 cases (45%) the same was commented upon in the CT scan. Basal fractures were more under reported than the vault in the CT scan. Most common type of fractures missed in the CT scan was solitary fissured fracture followed by comminuted fracture. Fractures involving middle cranial fossa were missed more often than other fossae in CT scan. Among intracranial haemorrhages, subarachnoid haemorrhage was missed more frequently than others.
Downloads
References
1. Reddy SP, Manjunatha B, Balaraj BM. Correlation of computed tomography and autopsy findings of cranio-cerebral injuries sustained in road traffic accidents. J-SIMLA Sep 2009; 1(2): 53-57.
2. Bordignon KC, Arruda WO. CT scan findings in mild head trauma. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2002; 60(2-A): 204-210.
3. Goel M, Goel R, Kochar SR, Goel MR. Fracture of the temporal
bone: A Tomographic v/s Autopsy study. J Indian Acad Forensic Med JIAFM 2007; 29(4): 0971-0973.
4. Sharma R, Murari A. A comparative evaluation of CT scan findings and Post mortem examination findings in head injuries. Indian Internet J Forensic Med and Toxicology IIJFMT 2006; 4(2).
5. Nemetz PN, Ludwig J, Kurland LT. Assessing the Autopsy. Am J Pathol 1987; 128(2): 362-379.
6. Zafar EM, Jahan RS, Husain M, Srivastava VK. A Study of the pattern of head injury in District Aligarh. U.P. India. J Indian Acad Forensic Med 2005; 27(2): 103-107.
7. Pathak A, Singh D, Khandelwal N. Fallacies of routine CT scan in identifying lesions in severe head injury. Indian J Neurotrauma 2006; 3(1): 37-42.
8. Jacobsen C, Bech BH, Lynnerup N. A comparative study of cranial, blunt trauma fractures as seen at medico legal autopsy and by Computed Tomography. BMC Med Imaging 2009; 9: 18-41.
9. Goyal MK, Verma R, Kochar SR, Asawa SS. Correlation of CT scan with Post mortem findings of Acute Head Trauma cases at SMS Hospital, Jaipur. J Indian Acad Forensic Med; 32(3): 208-211.
10. Jacobs L, Kinkel WR, Heffner Jr RR. Autopsy correlations of computerized tomography- Experience with 6,000 CT scans. Neurology 1976; 26: 1111.
