Evaluating the Law of Murder in Light of Soumya Judgment: A Medico- Legal Perspective

Authors

  • Dipa Dube Professor, Rajiv Gandhi School of Intellectual Property Law, IIT Kharagpur, Kharagpur, West Bengal, India
  • Mukesh Yadav Principal, Government Medical College, Uttar Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Murder, Medical evidence, Intention, Injuries, Rape, Forensic science

Abstract

The decision of the Supreme Court in Govindaswamy murder case has sent shockwaves across the nation. Although some have lauded the judgment, other scholars have condemned it on account of misinterpretation of the law on the subject. This paper analyses the judgment on the basis of legal principles and forensic evidence. Murder, as laid down in the Penal Code 1860, is not restricted to an intention to cause death on the part of the accused; it also extends to cases where the intention is to cause injury sufficient to cause death. The degrees of intent conceived in the notion of murder vary as laid down in law and it if for the court to comprehend the same on the basis of evidences. Forensic science forms a significant part of the evidence needed to establish the nature of the injuries perpetrated and their probable impact on the victim. Such evidence, in turn, is reflective of the intent on the part of the accused. Unfortunately, the court overlooked the medical evidence in the instant case, thereby making way for the accused to escape liability for murder, in a gory incident that snuffed the life of a young energetic woman.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Gogoi R, Pant PC, Lalit UU. Govindaswamy v. State of Kerala, Criminal Appeal Nos.1584-1585 of 2014, Date of Judgement 15.9.2016, AIR 2016 SC 4299[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb17). Available from: https://indiankanoon.org/doc/ 39943896/.

[2] Vibhute K. PSA Pillai’s Criminal Law. Nagpur: Lexis Nexis Butterworths Wadhwa; 2012. p. 571.

[3] Reg v. Monkhouse, 4 Cox C.C. 55; 1849.

[4] Thakur TS, Mishra GS. Ankush Shivaji Gaikwad v. State of Maharashtra, SLP (Crl.). 6287 of 2011 Date of Judgement 3.5.2013, AIR 2013 SC 2454 [homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 15]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/61901185/.

[5] Mathur GP, Raveendran RV. Pulicherla Nagaraju @Nagaraja Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh, Criminal Appeal No. 945 of 2004, Date of Judgement 18.8. 2006, (2006) 11 SC 444[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1173740/.

[6] Sharma M, Dattu HL. Arun Raj v. Union of India, Criminal Appeal No. 1123 of 2008 Date of Judgement 13. 5.2010. (2010)6 SCC 457[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/243154/.

[7] Hegde NS, Singh BP. State of Rajasthan vs. Dhool Singh, Criminal Appeal No. 299 of 1997, Date of Judgement 18.12. 2003, (2004) 12 SCC 546[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/ 1660548/.

[8] Singh GH. Indian Penal Code Vol. 1, Allahabad: Law Pub India Pvt. Ltd.; 2013. p.883.

[9] Bose V. Virsa Singh v. State of Punjab, Criminal Appeal 90 of 1957, AIR 1958 SC 465, Date of Judgement 11.3. 1958. AIR 1958 SC 465 [homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from:https:// indiankanoon.org/doc/1296255/.

[10] Sharma M, Dattu HL. Arun Raj v. Union of India, Criminal Appeal No.1123 OF 2008, Date of Judgement 13.5.2010, (2010) 6 SCC 457 [homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/243154/.

[11] Desai DA. Jagrup Singh v. State of Haryana, Criminal Appeal 403 0f 1981Date of Judgement 7.5.1981, AIR 1981 SC 1552 [homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 10]. Available from: https://indiankanoon.org/ doc/1529505/.

[12] Sikri SM. Harjinder Singh v. Delhi Administration Criminal Appeal 21 of 1965, Date of Judgement 14.11.1967. (1968) 2 SCJ 190[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/1723088/.

[13] Balakrishnan KG, Pasayat A. Ruli Ram v. State of Haryana Criminal Appeal 887-888 of 2001, Date of Judgement 17.9. 2002. JT 2002 (7) SC 267[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 10]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/561833/.

[14] Pasayat A, Kapadia S. Thangiya v. State of State of TN, Date of Judgement 8.12.2004. 2005 Cri LJ 684[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 12]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/ 11797992/;

[15] Ray GN, Pattnaik GB.Kasam Abdulla Hafiz vs. State of Maharashtra Criminal Appeal No. 1163 of 1997, Date of Judgment 14.12.1997, (1998) 1 SCC 526[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 15]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/43712/.

[16] Kumar S, Gogoi R. Atmaram v. State of Madhya Pradesh Criminal Appeal No.2003 of 2008, Date of Judgment 0.5.2012, AIR 2012 SC 1956 [homepage on the

Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/158985204/.

[17] Sinha SB, Sirpurkar VS. Kesar Singh v. State of Haryana, Criminal Appeal No. 754 of 2008 Date of Judgment 29.4.2008, (2008) 15 SCC 753 [homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 17]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/349982/.

[18] Pasayat A, Sathasivam P. Dayanand v. State of Haryana, Criminal Appeal No. 595 of 2008, Date of Judgment 3.4.2008[homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 12). Available from:http://sci.gov.in/jonew/judis/ 31078.pdf.

[19] Anand A, Barucha S. Sukhmandar Singh vs. State of Punjab Date of Judgement 4.10.1994, AIR 1995 SC 583 [homepage on the Internet]. Online [cited 2018 Feb 12]. Available from:https://indiankanoon.org/doc/ 1851583/.

Published

2018-02-28

How to Cite

Evaluating the Law of Murder in Light of Soumya Judgment: A Medico- Legal Perspective . (2018). Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 16(1&2), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.48165/