A 5 Year Study of Deaths Following Administration of Medically Prescribed Drugs: Diagnostic Dilemma and Challenges at Autopsy

Authors

  • Monisha Pradhan Associate Professor,Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
  • A Arthy Senior Resident,Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India
  • Amandeep Kaur Associate Professor, Maulana Azad Medical College, New Delhi, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Autopsy, Adverse drug reaction, Anaphylaxis, Death investigation, Mortality, Medical negligence

Abstract

A significant number of deaths occur worldwide due to medical error which is claimed to be the third leading cause of death after heart disease and cancer. Adverse drug reaction or events (ADR/ADE) which consists of drug toxicity, drug side effects and anaphylactic reactions to drugs are included in such deaths.[1] Concluding that death actually resulted from medical error or adverse drug reaction requires a thorough and detailed autopsy with supportive investigations for delivering justice to the bereaved parties. Deaths due to ADR’s is associated with diagnostic difficulties as there are only minimal and subtle morphological changes at autopsy which fade away with passage of time. The analysis of specific biochemical markers are not always possible due to lack of facilities. In such cases, the forensic pathologists rely on the autopsy findings and method of exclusion is used to arrive at a correct conclusion. This study is a retrospective analysis of 16 cases of deaths due to alleged medical negligence following medical administration of prescribed drugs, autopsied during a 5-year period from 2011 to 2015. The cases represented approximately 0.1% of all autopsy cases during that period. Data were analysed with regard to age, sex, alleged exposures, clinical symptoms, survival time, autopsy findings, cause of death and time since death. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Robert S. Hoffman, Mary Ann Howland, Neal A. Lewin, Lewis S. Nelson, Lewis R. Goldfrank. Goldfrank’s toxicological emergencies. 10th edn. New York Mc Graw Hill; 2015.

[2] Trani N, Bonetti LR, et al. Forensic investigation in anaphylactic deaths, forensic medicine – from old problems to new challenges. Intechopen. Rijeka 2011.

[3] Sreevastava DK, Tarneja VK. Anaphylactic reaction: an overview. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 2003;59(1):53–56.

[4] Edston E, Van Hage-Hamsten M. Diagnosis of anaphylaxis. Forensic Pathology Reviews 2005;3:267– 281. Humana Press, New Jersey: Totowa.

[5] Pumphrey RSH, Ian Sd Roberts. Postmortem findings after fatal anaphylactic reactions. Journal of Clinical Pathology 2000;53(1):273–276.

[6] Delage C, Irey NS. Anaphylactic deaths: A clinico pathologic study of 43 cases. Journal of Forensic Sciences 1972;17(4):525–540.

[7] Luongo S, Frontalini C, Pesaresi M, Valsecchi M, Tagliabracci A. Histo pathological markers for the diagnosis of anaphylactic death. Medical Science Law 2011;51(2): 30–36.

[8] Schwartz LB, Yunginger JW, Miller J, et al. Time course of appearance of human mast cell tryptase in the circulation after anaphylaxis. Journal of Clinical Investigation 1989;83(1):1551–1555.

[9] Schwartz LB. Diagnostic value of tryptase in anaphylaxis and mastocytosis. Immunology and Allergy Clinics of North America 2006;26(3):451–463

[10] Edston E, Eriksson O, Van Hage M. Mast cell tryptase in postmortem serum reference values and confounders. International Journal of Legal Medicine 2007;121(4):275–280.

[11] Belsey SL, Flanagan RJ. Postmortem biochemistry: current application. Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine 2016;4(1):49–57.

[12] Simon G, Brown A. Clinical features and severity grading of anaphylaxis. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology 2004;114(2):371–376.

[13] Low I, Stables S. Anaphylactic deaths in Auckland, New Zealand: a review of coronial autopsies from 1985 to 2005. Anatomical Pathology 2006;38(4):328–332.

[14] Ansari MQ, Zamora JL, Lipscomb MF. Postmortem diagnosis of acute anaphylaxis by serum tryptase analysis. A case report. American Society for Clinical Pathology 1993;99(4):101–103.

[15] Edston E, Van Hage-Hanster M. Beta Tryptase measurements postmortem in anaphylactic deaths and controls. Forensic Science International 1989;93(3):135– 142.

[16] Wang HJ, Song WP, et al. Application of serum total IgE, tryptase and chymase in the identification of death caused by drug anaphylactic shock. Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi 2012;28(3):167–171.

[17] McLean-Tooke A, Goulding M, Bundell C, White J, Hollingsworth P. Postmortem serum tryptase levels in

anaphylactic and non-anaphylactic deaths. Journal of Clinical Pathology 2014;67(2):134–138.

[18] Yunginger JW, Nelson DR, Squillace DL, Jones RT, Holley KE, Hyma BA, Biedrzycki L, Sweeney KG, Sturner WQ, Schwartz LB. Laboratory investigation of deaths due to anaphylaxis. Journal of Forensic Sciences 1991;36(3):857–865.

[19] Roger BW. Anaphylaxis at autopsy. Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 2017;13(3):269–271.

Published

2019-04-30

How to Cite

A 5 Year Study of Deaths Following Administration of Medically Prescribed Drugs: Diagnostic Dilemma and Challenges at Autopsy. (2019). Indian Internet Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 17(1&2), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.48165/