Role of Autopsy in Allegations of Medical Negligence with Analysis of the Current Trends
Keywords:
Medical negligence, Litigation, Autopsy, Cause of deathAbstract
The present study is a retrospective analysis of 87 cases of death resulting from alleged medical negligence. The cases constituted 1.5% of the total autopsies in a 5-year period. Data were analyzed with respect to age, sex, clinical history, place and duration of treatment, specialty involved, postmortem findings, and cause of death after autopsy and so on. The most common age group was 21–30 years (22.9%) followed by 13–20 years and infant age group (13.9% each). Number of cases was almost equal in both the sexes and most cases were treated at private hospitals. Treatment errors or substandard treatment were the most common allegations. In all, 31 cases had no history of any major preexisting disease, whereas 15 cases had a clinical history of a major preexisting disease. In all, 15 cases were postsurgical deaths, 12 cases were of maternal deaths and 10 cases were of stillbirths. Obstetric surgery and abdominal surgery (33.3% each) were the leading causes of postsurgical allegation of medical negligence followed by cardiac surgery (28.6%) and orthopedic surgery (4.8%). The trends in medical negligence in India along with the role and significance of autopsy in the outcome of such cases have been discussed here.
Downloads
References
[1] Sangwan S. Medical Negligence. Lawyers script, October 20, 2021. [Internet] [Accessed on 12 March 2022]. Available from: https://lawyerscript.com/tag/medical negligence.
[2] India Medical Negligence Report, NCDRC disposed cases. QME India. [Internet] [Accessed on: 12 March 2022]. Available from: http://www.qmeindia.in/IndMedNegClock
[3] Modi JP, Kannan K, Mathiharan K. Modi A Textbook of Medical Jurisprudence & Toxicology, 24th edn. Lexis Nexis: Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur 2012; 119-165.
[4] Perkins GD, McAuley DF, Davies S, Gao F. Discrepancies between clinical and postmortem diagnoses in critically ill patients: an observational study. Critical Care 2003; 7(6):1- 4.
[5] Roulson JA, Benbow EW, Hasleton PS. Discrepancies between clinical and autopsy diagnosis and the value of post mortem histology; a meta analysis and review. Histopathology 2005; 47(6):551-59.
[6] Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. The autopsy as an outcome and performance measure. Evidence report/technology assessment (summary) 2002; (58):1-5.
[7] Shojania KG, Burton EC, McDonald KM, Goldman L. Changes in rates of autopsy-detected diagnostic errors over time: a systematic review. JAMA 2003; 289(21):2849-56.
[8] Makary MA, Daniel M. Medical error–the third leading cause of death in the US. BMJ 2016; 353: i2139.
[9] He F, Li L, Bynum J, Meng X, Yan P, Li L, et al. Medical malpractice in Wuhan, China: a 10-year autopsy-based single-center study. Medicine 2015; 94(45):e2026.
[10] Madea B, Preub J. Medical malpractice as reflected by the forensic evaluation of 4450 autopsies. Forensic Science International 2009; 190(1-3):58-66.
[11] Chaudhary BL, Singh RK, Singh S, Shukla PK. Recent trends of medical negligence–An autopsy-based study at Lady Hardinge medical college, New Delhi. IJFMT 2020; 5(2):35-38.
[12] Rayamane AP, Nanandkar SD, Kundargi PA. Profile of medical negligence cases in India. JIAFM 2016; 38(2):144- 48.
[13] Edulla N K, Kethvath R, Alugonda Y, Kothapalli J, Goud A K. Determination of role and issues of autopsy in medical negligence. IJMSPH 2013; 5(9):26-36.
[14] Bove KE, Iery C. The role of the autopsy in medical malpractice cases, I: a review of 99 appeals court decisions. Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine 2002; 126(9):1023-31.
[15] Lee AV, Moriarty JP, Borgstrom C, Horwitz LI. What can we learn from patient dissatisfaction? An analysis of dissatisfying events at an academic medical center. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2010; 5(9):514-20.
