Funding and University Performance: An Econometric Analysis of the Indian Public Universities

Authors

  • Amanpreet Kaur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/gmj.2022.17.1.6

Keywords:

Funding, University performance, Panel data analysis, National Institutional Ranking Framework, National Education Policy

Abstract

Underpinning the aim of India’s National Education Policy, 2020 to  devise a performance-based funding mechanism, it is pertinent to  examine the impact of existing financial support on the university’s  performance. Using a fixed panel data analysis, the present study  investigates the influence of funding on the performance of Indian  public universities over the period 2016-2020. The funding is considered  in terms of the plan and non-plan grants received by universities  from the central government, while performance is measured using  performance parameters given by National Institutional Ranking  Framework, 2021. Controlling the age, size and ownership type of  university, findings reveal a significantly positive impact of funding on  teaching performance, research performance and graduation outcomes  of government-owned universities. Surprisingly, university’s outreach,  inclusivity and peer perception have been observed to be indifferent  towards central grants. Overall, the study provides valuable insights to  university practitioners and policymakers for future development of  the performance-funding mechanism. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abbott, M., & Doucouliagos, H. (2004). Research output of Australian universities. Education Economics, 12(3), 251-265.

Asif, M., & Searcy, C. (2014). A composite index for mea suring performance in higher education institu tions. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(9), 983-1001.

Azma, F. (2010). Qualitative Indicators for the evaluation of universities performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 5408-5411.

Badri, M. A., & Abdulla, M. H. (2004). Awards of excel lence in institutions of higher education: an AHP approach. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(4), 224-242.

Ball, R., & Halwachi, J. (1987). Performance indicators in higher education. Higher education, 16(4), 393-405. Barnett, R. (1992). Improving higher education: Total qual ity care. Open University Press, 1900 Frost Rd., Suite 101, Bristol, PA 19007.

Belfield, C. R., & Fielding, A. (2001). Measuring the relationship between resources and outcomes in higher education in the UK. Economics of Education Review, 20(6), 589-602.

Bloch, C., Graversen, E. K., & Pedersen, H. S. (2014). Competitive research grants and their impact on career performance. Minerva, 52(1), 77-96.

Bunting, M. (2020). Dimensions and indicators of non profit financial condition: Evidence from South African public universities. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 23(1), 1-17.

Carmona, M., & Sieh, L. (2004). Measuring Quality in Planning: managing the performance process. Routledge.

Chattopadhyay, S. (2020). Public Funding of Universities. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(2), 33. Colclough, C., & De, A. (2010). The impact of aid on education policy in India. International Journal of Educational Development, 30(5), 497-507.

Doh, S., Jang, D., Kang, G. M., & Han, D. S. (2018). Research funding and performance of academic researchers in South Korea. Review of policy research, 35(1), 31-60.

Dougherty, K., & Reddy, V. (2011). The impacts of state performance funding systems on higher education institutions: Research literature review and policy

recommendations. CCRC Working Paper 37. New York, NY: CCRC.

El Talla, S. A., FarajAllah, A., Abu Naser, S. S., & Al Shobaki, M. J. (2018). The Reality of University Performance According to the Models of Excellence in Palestinian Universities. International Journal of Academic Multidisciplinary Research (IJAMR), 2(10), 62-77.

Gill, S., & Kaur, P. (2015). Family involvement in busi ness and financial performance: a panel data analy sis. Vikalpa, 40(4), 395-420.

Greene, W. H. (2008). Econometric Analysis, 6th edition, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Gulbrandsen, M., & Smeby, J. C. (2005). Industry fund ing and university professors’ research perfor mance. Research policy, 34(6), 932-950.

Hattie, J. (1990). Performance indicators in educa tion. Australian Journal of Education, 34(3), 249-276. Higgins, J. C. (1989). Performance measurement in univer

sities. European journal of operational research, 38(3), 358-368.

Hillman, N. W., Tandberg, D. A., & Gross, J. P. (2014). Performance funding in higher education: Do finan cial incentives impact college completions?. The journal of higher education, 85(6), 826-857.

Hou, A. Y. C. (2012). Impact of excellence programs on Taiwan higher education in terms of quality assur ance and academic excellence, examining the con flicting role of Taiwan’s accrediting agencies. Asia Pacific Education Review, 13(1), 77-88.

Johnes, G. (1992). Performance indicators in higher edu cation: a survey of recent work. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 8(2), 19-34.

Johnes, J. (2016). Performance indicators and rankings in higher education. In: Valuing Higher Education: An appreciation of the work of Gareth Williams and the Centre for Higher Education Studies, Institute of Education, University College London.

Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1990). Performance indicators in higher education. Bristol, PA: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced score card: measures that drive performance. Harvard business review, January-February, 71-79.

Kapoor, G., & Arya, M. P. A Study of Public Funding and Enrolment in Indian Higher Education. A bi-annual Refereed International Journal of Management & IT, 17(2), 48-56.

Lee, Y. H., & Kim, H. K. (2019). Financial support and university performance in Korean universities: A panel data approach. Sustainability, 11(20), 5871.

Liefner, I. (2003). Funding, resource allocation, and per formance in higher education systems. Higher educa tion, 46(4), 469-489.

Mok, K. H. (2003). Similar trends, diverse agendas: Higher education reforms in East Asia. Globalisation, societ ies and education, 1(2), 201-221.

Nassa, A. K., Arora, J., Singh, P., Joorel, J. P., Trivedi, K., Solanki, H., & Kumar, A. (2021). Five Years of India Rankings (NIRF) and its Impact on Performance Parameters of Engineering Institutions in India. Pt. 2. Research and Professional Practices. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 41(2), 116-129.

Park, H. M. (2011). Practical guides to panel data mod eling: a step-by-step analysis using STATA. Public Management and Policy Analysis Program, Graduate School of International Relations, International University of Japan, 12, 1-52.

Sanford, T., & Hunter, J. M. (2011). Impact of performance funding on retention and graduation rates. education policy analysis archives, 19(33), 1-30.

Shin, J. C. (2010). Impacts of performance-based account ability on institutional performance in the US. Higher Education, 60(1), 47-68.

Suryadi, K. (2007). Framework of measuring key per formance indicators for decision support in higher education institution. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 3(12), 1689-1695.

Taylor, J. (2001). Improving performance indicators in higher education: The academics’ perspec tive. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 25(3), 379-393.

Tochkov, K., Nenovsky, N., & Tochkov, K. (2012). University efficiency and public funding for higher education in Bulgaria. Post-Communist Economies, 24(4), 517-534.

University Grants Commission. (2016). Annual Report 2015-2016 (UGC).

University Grants Commission. (2017). Annual Report 2016-2017 (UGC).

University Grants Commission. (2018). Annual Report 2017-2018 (UGC).

University Grants Commission. (2019). Annual Report 2018-2019 (UGC).

University Grants Commission. (2020). Annual Report 2019-2020 (UGC).

Wang, X. (2010). Performance measurement in universities: Managerial Perspective (Master›s thesis, University of Twente).

Yi, P., Kwak, J., & Kim, J. (2015). The impact of perfor mance funding on institutional performance over time: evidence from South Korean universities. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 501-515.

Published

2023-03-06

Issue

Vol. 17 No. 1 (2023): Gyan Managment Journal, (Jan-Jun), 2023

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Kaur , A. (2023). Funding and University Performance: An Econometric Analysis of the Indian Public Universities. Gyan Management Journal, 17(1), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.48165/gmj.2022.17.1.6
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC