Exploring the Interplay of Scale and Innovation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Keywords:
Scale, Innovation, Strategy, Policy, ManagementAbstract
This paper explores the dynamic interplay between the concepts of scale and in-novation, emphasizing the multifaceted and interdisciplinary nature of their re-lationship. Drawing insights from human geography, political ecology, and eco-nomics, the study delves into how scale—understood as hierarchical, relational, and fluid—shapes and is shaped by innovative processes. It argues that innovation is not only about the introduction of new products or processes but also about their diffusion and adaptation across various scales. By examining theories like “scale jumping” and “scale bending,” the paper illustrates how organizations and innovators navigate different levels of operation to optimize resources, align with socio-political contexts, and address market demands. Through case studies the paper highlights the relational and strategic dimensions of scale in innovation. It also addresses challenges such as resource standardization, control dynamics, and localized policy needs. Ultimately, the paper underscores the critical role of scale as a tool for fostering sustainable and inclusive innovation, advocating for a nuanced understanding of its implications in a globalized world.
References
Born, B., & Purcell, M. (2006). Avoiding the Local Trap: Scale and Food Systems in Planning Research. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(2), 195–207. https://doi. org/10.1177/0739456X06291389
Delaney, D., & Leitner, H. (1997). The political construction of scale. Political Geography, 16(2), 93–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/ S0962-6298(96)00045-5
Doreen Massey. (1994). Space, Place, and Gender. Retrieved from https://www.upress.umn.edu/book-division/books/space place-and-gender
Edward J. Rykiel Jr. (1998). Relationships of Scale to Policy and Decision Making. In Ecological Scale: Theory and Application. Columbia University Press.
Gough, J., (2004). Changing scale as changing class relations: variety and contradiction in the politics of scale. Political Geography, 23(2), 185–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2003.11.005
Hayden, D. (1997). The Power of Place: Urban Landscapes as Public History. MIT Press.
Herod, A. (1991). The production of scale in United States labour relations. Area, 82–88.
Jonas, A. E. G. (1994). The Scale Politics of Spaliality. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 12(3), 257–264. https:// doi.org/10.1068/d120257
Kurtz, H. E. (2003). Scale frames and counter-scale frames: constructing the problem of environmental injustice. Political Geography, 22(8), 887–916. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. polgeo.2003.09.001
Lebel, L., Garden, P., & Imamura, M. (2005). The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong Region. Ecology and Society, 10(2). https://doi. org/10.5751/ES-01543-100218
Longley, P. A., Goodchild, M., Maguire, D. J., & Rhind, D. W. (2010). Geographic Information Systems & Science (3 edition). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
MacKinnon, D. (2011). Reconstructing scale: Towards a new scalar politics. Progress in Human Geography, 35(1), 21–36. https:// doi.org/10.1177/0309132510367841
MandeL, M. (n.d.). Scale and Innovation in Today’s Economy. 10. Marston, S. A., Jones, J. P., & Woodward, K. (2005). Human geography without scale. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 30(4), 416–432. https://doi.org/10.1 111/j.1475-5661.2005.00180.xNathan F., S. (2009). Scale. In Blackwell Companions to Geography. A companion to
environmental geography. Chichester, U.K. ; Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
Nelson, & Rosenberg. (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis, 1993 | Online Research Library: Questia. Retrieved May 21, 2019, from https://www.questia. com/library/85733270/national-innovation-systems-a comparative-analysis
Neumann, R. P. (2009). Political ecology: theorizing scale. Progress in Human Geography, 33(3), 398–406. https://doi. org/10.1177/0309132508096353
OECD. (2002). Frascati Manual 2002: Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys on Research and Experimental Development. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264199040-en
Prytherch, D. L. (2007). Urban Geography With Scale: Rethinking Scale VIA Wal-Mart’s “Geography of Big Things”1. Urban Geography, 28(5), 456–482. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272- 3638.28.5.456
Quan Gao. (2019). Scale. In Introducing Social Geographies. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/332672760_ Scale_-_Introducing_Social_Geographies
Sallie A. Marston. (2000). The social construction of scale. Retrieved May 23, 2019, from https://journals.sagepub.com/ doi/10.1191/030913200674086272
Smith, N., & Harvey, D. (2008). Uneven Development: Nature, Capital, and the Production of Space (3rd edition). Athens: University of Georgia Press.
Swyngedouw, E., & Cox, K. (1997). Neither Global Nor Local: ‘Glocalization’ and the Politics of Scale. Spaces of Globalization: Reasserting the Power of the Local, 137–166.
Systems of Innovation: Growth, Competitiveness and Employment. (2014, October 14). Retrieved May 21, 2019, from Charles Edquist website: https://charlesedquist.com/books/systems of-innovation-growth-competitiveness-and-employment/
Taylor, P. J. (1982). A Materialist Framework for Political Geography. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 7(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.2307/621909
Taylor, P. J. (1987). The Paradox of Geographical Scale in Marx’s Politics*. Antipode, 19(3), 287–306. https://doi. org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1987.tb00376.x
Williams, R. W. (1999). Environmental injustice in America and its politics of scale. Political Geography, 18(1), 49–73. https://doi. org/10.1016/S0962-6298(98)00076-
