Evaluation of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana) germplasm for fruit setting characters

Authors

  • Vikalp Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India- 125004.
  • Mukesh Kumar Assistant Horticulturist, RRS Bawal (Rewari), Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India- 125004.
  • Mukesh Bishnoi Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India- 125004.
  • Deepak Sangwan Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India- 125004.
  • Arjoo Department of Horticulture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, India- 125004.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/chr.2023.11.3.12

Keywords:

Ber, Fruit setting, Colour, Flowering, Oval, Ovate, Ridged, Variability

Abstract

The study was carried out to evaluate variability between different ber (Ziziphus mauritiana Lamk.) germplasm on the basis  of flowering and fruit setting. Significant variability was observed for the recorded parameters. Bawal Ber 12 exhibited early  initiation, while BS 3 showed delayed flower initiation. The shortest flowering duration was recorded in Bawal Ber 9 (37 days),  whereas longest flowering duration was recorded in Bawal Ber 1, Bawal Ber 5 and BS 1 (42 days). Different germplasm displayed  notable variation in mature fruit colour, including greenish-yellow, yellow and green. Oval shaped fruits were observed in Bawal  Ber 1, Bawal Ber 9 and BS 3 while Bawal Ber 2, Bawal Ber 5, Bawal Ber 6, Bawal Ber 7, Bawal Ber 8, Bawal Ber 10 and BS 2 exhibited  ovate shape. Bawal Ber 3, Bawal Ber 4 and BS 1 had oblong fruits and Bawal Ber 11 displayed an oblate shape whereas Bawal Ber  12 had round fruits. The stone shape of ber germplasm varied with some exhibiting a spindle, oblong, club or oval shape. Bawal  Ber 1, Bawal Ber 2, Bawal Ber 3, Bawal Ber 4, Bawal Ber 5, Bawal Ber 7, Bawal Ber 9, Bawal Ber 10 and Bawal Ber 12 had a plain  fruit surface, while Bawal Ber 6, Bawal Ber 8, Bawal Ber 11, BS 1, BS 2 and BS 3 showed a ridged and wart fruit surface. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bal J S.1992. Identification of ber(Ziziphus mauritianaLamk.) cultivars through vegetative andfruit characters. Acta Hort. 317:245-53.

Choudhary H D, Garhwal O P and Choudhary M R. 2017. Evaluation of performance of flowering, fruiting

and quality characters of twenty genotypes of ber (Zizyphusmauritiana) under semi-arid conditions of Rajasthan. Current Horticulture 5(2): 48-52.

Choudhary R, Garhwal O P, Choudhary H D and Choudhary I. 2020. Interactive effect of organic manures and fertility levels on growth, fruit yield and B: C ratio of ber (Zizyphusmauritiana) under semi-arid conditions. Current Horticulture 8(1): 44-46.

Ezhilarasi A and Tamilmani C. 2009. Influence of paddy husk on the ripening of fruit of Ziziphus mauritianaLamk. ARPN J. Agric. Bio. Sci. 4(6): 29-42.

Godi N F, Joshi V R and Supe V S. 2016. Physical fruit characteristics assessment of selected ber (Ziziphus mauritianaLamk.) genotypes. International J. Appl. Res., 2(2): 757-61.

Krishna H, Bhargava R, Chauhan N and Sharma S K. 2016. Morphological descriptor for DUS testing of Indian jujube (Ziziphus mauritiana). Indian J. Agric. Sci .86(6): 809-14.

Kundi A H K, Wazir F K, Abdul Ghafoor and Wazir Z D K. 1989. Morphological characteristics, yield and yield components of different cultivars of ber (Ziziphus jujube Mill.). Sarhad J. Agril. 5(1): 53-57.

Mahajan R K, Gangopadhyay K K, Kumar D V G, Srivastava U and Gupta P N. 2002. Minimal descriptors of Agrihorticultural crops. Part III: Fruit Crops (No. C042. 018). National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources, New Delhi.

Nath V and Bhargava R. 2000. Flowering scenario in commercial cultivars of jujube (Ziziphus mauritianaLamk.) under Indian arid ecosystem. J. App. Hort. 2(2): 98-101.

Nehra N S, Chitkara S D and Singh K. 1984. Studies of morphological characters of some wild forms and cultivated varieties of ber. Punjab Hort. J. 24(1-4): 49-59.

PPV&FRA, New Delhi. 2016. Guidelines of PPV&FRA for the conduct of test for distinctiveness, uniformity and stability on Indian jujube (ber) (Ziziphus mauritianaLamk.). Plant Var. J. India10(2).

Raja S. 2004. ‘Morphological and molecular characterization of bergermplasm’. M.Sc. Thesis, CCS HAU,Hisar.

Saran P L. 2005. ‘Studies on genetic divergence in ber (Ziziphus mauritianaLamk.) germplasm’. Ph.D. Thesis, CCS HAU, Hisar.

Sharif N, Jaskani M J, Alwi M, Bloch D M, Abbas M M and Ishfaq M. 2013. Categorization of Ber varieties in relation to blooming period, fruit setting and harvesting time. Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 50(3): 407-13.

Singh V and Deen B. 2022. Studies on changes in physical characters during development of ber (Zizyphusmauritiana) fruits. Current Horticulture 10(1): 69-70.

Torahi A. 2004. Identification and evaluation of Ziziphus germplasm from south of Iran. III International Symposium on Tropical and Subtropical Fruits 864: 45-48.

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Evaluation of ber (Ziziphus mauritiana) germplasm for fruit setting characters. (2024). Current Horticulture, 11(3), 67–70. https://doi.org/10.48165/chr.2023.11.3.12