Evaluation of wild edible plants of Andaman and Nicobar Islands for food and nutritional security

Authors

  • T V R S Sharma ICAR-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute (CIARI), Port Blair 744 101, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
  • K Abirami ICAR-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute (CIARI), Port Blair 744 101, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
  • K Venkatesan ICAR-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute (CIARI), Port Blair 744 101, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India
  • V Baskaran ICAR-Central Island Agricultural Research Institute (CIARI), Port Blair 744 101, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Conservation, Food, Nutrition, Tribes, Wild edible plants

Abstract

About 153 wild plants were identified as edible used by tribals of the Andaman and Nicobar Islands, including 63 trees (2 small trees), 38 herbs, 23 shrubs, 16 climbers, 2 each creepers, twinners, grasses and sedges, and one each fern, vine and weed. Various parts of these plants were reported to be utilized as food, fruits, vegetables and utilized for making pickle/jam and jelly/beverages. Many tuber crops belonging to Dioscoreaceae family such as Dioscorea esculenta, D. glabra, D. pentaphylla and D. vexans are relished by the tribals. Therefore, conservation and enriching the population of these plants in tribal area is very important. The nutritional aspects and the presence of dangerous steroids in these plants if any have to be studied in detail. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abraham Z, Senthilkumar R, Joseph John K, Sharma T V R S, Nair N V, Unnikrishnan M, Kumaran P M, Johnson, George K, Uma S, Latha M, Malik S S, Mishra S K, Bhandari D C and Pareek S K. 2008. Collection of plant genetic resources from Andaman and Nicobar islands. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 55: 1279-89.

Awasthi A K and John Jacob. 1987. A contribution to the forest resources of Great Nicobar islands. J. Andaman Sci. Assoc. 3(1): 24-27.

Awasthi A K. 1988a. Some fibre yielding plants of Andaman and Nicobar islands. J. Andaman Sci. Assoc. 4(1): 85-86.

Awasthi A K. 1988b. Plants used as food items by the tribals of Andaman and Nicobar islands. J. Andaman Sci. Assoc. 4: 128-131.

Garg N and Kumar P C. 2014. Food antimicrobials: challenges and prospects. Current Horticulture 2(1): 5-17.

Mahapatra A K, Satarupa Mishra, Basak U C and panda P C. 2012. Nutrient analysis o some selected wild edible fruits of Decisions forest of Indian. An explorative study towards non conventional Bio-nutrition. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology 4(1): 15-21.

Pandey R P and Diwakar P G. 2008. An integrated check- List flora of Andaman and Nicobar Islands, India. J. Econ. Taxon. Bot. 32: 2.

Remesh K, Remya R, Byju G, Soman S, Raju S and Ravi V. 2019. Future changes in mean temperature and total precipitation and climate suitability of yam (Dioscorea spp.) in major yam-growing environments in India. Current Horticulture 7(1): 28-42.

Sachin A J, Balerao P P, Patil S J and Desai B S. 2016. Essential oils beyond aroma - a review. Current Horticulture 4(2): 3-6.

Sharma T V R S, Jeyakumar V, Shyju T C, Rajalakshmi S, Ganeshiah K N, Joseph John K and Srivastava R C. 2010. Floristic Diversity of Potential Horticultural Plants in Bay Islands. Indian J. Plant Genet. Resou. 23(2): 199-205.

Singh D B, Sreekumar P V, Sharma T V R S and Bandyopadhyay A K. 1998. Musa balbisiana var. and amanica (Musaceae)- A new Banana Variety from Andaman Island. Malayan Nature J. 52(3&4): 157-60.

Sreekumar P V, Singh D B and Sharma T V R S. 1996a. Occurrence of Annona glabra L. - A wild relative of Custered apple in Andaman Island, India. Malayan Nature J. 50: 81- 83.

Sreekumar P V, Veenakumari K and Padhye P M. 1996b. Mangifera griffithi (Anacardiaceae), an edition to Indian mangoes from Andaman Islands. Malayan Nature J. 50: 85-87.

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Evaluation of wild edible plants of Andaman and Nicobar Islands for food and nutritional security . (2024). Current Horticulture, 8(2), 57–62. https://doi.org/10.48165/