Modelling the growth, yield, and future climate suitability of underutilized tropical tuber crops-‘aroids’: A review

Authors

  • Raji Pushpalatha ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
  • Byju Gangadharan ICAR – Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/chr.2023.11.3.1

Keywords:

Elephantfoot yam, taro, aroids, climate change, food security, crop models, climate suitability

Abstract

Elephantfoot yam and taro are important aroids of tropical tuber crops and considered as underutilized in the context of  climate change and food security. This study focuses on the existing modelling studies on growth, yield, and future climate  suitability of elephantfoot yam and taro. Among different crop models, SUBSTOR-Aroids, AquaCrop, and WOFOST are tested  internationally to simulate the crop growth and yield of aroids. The QUEFTS model is tested in India for aroids in estimating  crop yield based on site-specific nutrient management. EcoCrop is used to predict the future climate suitability of aroids. This  review indicates very limited studies are available for aroids compared to other tropical tuber crops. This shows the necessity to  focus more on these underutilized aroids as they are superior in per hectare production to that of major foodgrain crops. This  review also recommends modelling studies on aroids to identify or develop a better model structure irrespective of the agro climatic conditions. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boogaard H, Van Diepen C, Rotter R, Cabrera J and Van Laar H. 1998. WOFOST 7.1; user’s guide for the WOFOST 7.1 crop growth simulation model and WOFOST Control Center 1.50927-4499.

Singh U, Tsuji GY, Goenaga R and Prasad HK. 1992. Modeling growth and development of taro and tanier. p. 45-56. In U. Singh (ed.) Proceedings of the workshop on taro and tanier modeling, 8-14 August 1991, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA.

Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Raes D and Fereres E. 2009. AquaCrop – the FAO model tosimulate yield response to water: I. Concepts and underlying principles. AgronomyJournal 101: 426–437.

Sunitha S, Sreekumar J, Suresh Kumar J. 2023. Response of upland taro to varying water regimes under humid tropical conditions of India. Current Horticulture 11(1): 50-53.

Sunitha A, Santhosh Mithra VS and Sreekumar J. 2021. Phenology and productivity of elephantfoot yam in relation to planting time under humid tropical conditions. Current Horticulture 9(2): 36-40.

Sunitha S, George J, Suja G, Jyothi AN and Rajalekshmi A. 2020. Water smart technologies for irrigation water management of elephant foot yam in tropical zones of India. Journal of Water and Climate Change 11(4): 1495-

Sunitha S, Ravi V, Geoerge J and Suja G. 2013. Aroids and water relations: An overview. Journal of Root Crops 39(1): 10-21.

Taba-Morales G, Hyman G, Mejia JR, Castro-Llanos F, Beebe S, Rubyogo JC, Katungi E and Buruchara R. 2020. Improving African bean productivity in a changing global environment. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 25: 1013-1029.

Bora B and Handique P. 2023. Evaluation of bio-formulations for management of storage rot of seed tubers of Colocasia. Current Horticulture 11(1): 48-49.

Bradbury JH and Holloway WD. 1988. Chemistry of Tropical Root Crops: Significance for Nutrition and Agriculture in the Pacifics. XF2006282710.6.

Byju G, Nedunchezhiyan M, George J, Sunitha S, Kamalkumaran R, Singh PP, Mamatha K, Mitra S, Tarafdar J, Desai K, Ravi V, Vani M, Sabitha S and Remya KR. 2016. Fertilizer best management practices by SSNM and customised fertilizers for elephant foot yam cultivation in India. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 86(4): 485-493.

Byju G, Sabitha S and Vani M. 2016. Projected climate changes and environment suitability of foot yam in major growing areas of India. Indian Journal of Horticulture 75(2): 341-344.

FAO. 2000. The EcoCrop database. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

FAOSTAT. 2021. Production; taro; world; 2019 (Online). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#rankings/countries_by_ commodity. Accessed on 20 May 2021.

Godwin DC and Singh U. 1991. Modeling of nitrogen dynamics in rice cropping systems. Pages 287-294 in Deturk P, Ponnamperuma F N (Eds.) Rice production on acid soils of the tropics. Institute of Fundamental Studies, Kandy, Sri Lanka.

Hijmans RJ, Cruz M, Rojas E and Guarino L. 2001. DIVAGIS, Version 1.4. A geographic information system for the management and analysis of genetic resources data. Manual. International Potato Center, Lima, Peru.

Hsiao TC, Heng L, Steduto P, Rojas-Lara B, Raes D and Fereres E. 2009. AquaCrop-The FAO Crop Model to Simulate Yield Response to Water: III. Parameterization and Testing for Maize. Agronomy Journal 101(3): 448.

Janssen BH, Guiking FCT, van der Eijk D, Smaling EMA, Wolf J and van Reuler H. 1990. A system for quantitative evaluation of the fertility of tropical soils (QUEFTS). Geoderma 46: 299-318.

Jones JW, Hoogenboom G, Porter CH, Boote KJ, Batchelor WD, Hunt LA, Wilkens PW, Singh U, Gijsman AJ and Ritchie JT. 2003. The DSSAT cropping system model. European Journal of Agronomy 18: 235-265.

Kamalkumaran PR, Velmurugan M, Anand M and Arumugam T. 2020. Site-specific nutrient management in elephant foot yam. International Journal of Chemical Studies 8(6): 252-255.

Mabhaudhi T, Modi AT and Beletse YG. 2014. Parameterisation and evaluation of the FAO-AquaCrop model for a South African taro landrace. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 192-193: 132-139.

Moreno-Cadena P, Hoogenboom G, Cock JH, Ramirez-Villegas J, Pypers P, Kreye C, Tariku M, Ezui KS, Lopez-Lavalle LAB and Asseng S. 2021. Modelling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review. Field Crops Research 267: 108140.

Nedunchezhiyan M, Suja G, and Ravi V. 2022. Tropical root and tuber crops-based cropping system- a review. Current Horticulture 10(1): 14-22.

Pushpalatha R and Byju G. 2022. QUEFTS-a tool for site specific nutrient management of crops: A meta-analysis. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis. 10.1080/00103624.2022.2071924

Pushpalatha R, Santhosh Mithra VS, Sunitha S, George J, Nedunchezhiyan M, Mamatha K, Ashok P, Alam S, Saud BK, Tarafdar J, Mitra S, Deo C, Velmurugan M, Suja G, Ravi V and Byju G. 2022. Impact of climate change on the yield of tropical root and tuber crops vs. rice and potato in India. Food Security. 10.1007/s12571-021-01226-z.

Pushpalatha R, Shiny R and Byju G. 2021a. Impact of climate change on the potential geographical suitability of cassava and sweet potato vs. rice and potato in India. Theoretical and Applied Climatology 146: 941-960.

Pushpalatha R, Sunitha S, Santhosh Mithra VS and Byju G. 2021b. Impact of climate change on water requirement of tropical root and tuber crops in India. International Journal of Innovative Horticulture 10(2): 170-172.

Pushpalatha R, Kutty G and Byju G. 2021c. Sensitivity analysis of WOFOST for yield simulation of cassava over the major growing areas of India. Journal of Agrometeorology 23(4): 375-380.

Pushpalatha R and Byju G. 2020. Is cassava a climate smart crop? A review in the context of bridging future food demand gap. Tropical Plant Biology. https://doi. org/10.1007/s12042-020-09255.

Raes D, Steduto P, Hsiao TC and Fereres E. 2009. AquaCrop the FAO crop model forpredicting yield response to water: II. Main algorithms and software description. Agronomy Journal 101: 438–447.

Raju J and Byju G. 2019. Quantitative determination of NPK uptake requirements of taro. Journal of Plant Nutrition 42(3): 203-217.

Ravi V, Ravindran CS, Suja G, George J, Nedunchezhiyan M, Byju G, Naskar SK (2011) Crop physiology of elephant foot yam. Adv. Hort. Sci. 25(1): 51-63.

Raymundo R, Asseng S, Cammarano D and Quiroz R. 2014. Potato, sweet potato, and yam models for climate change: A review. Field Crops Research 166: 173-185.

Ritchie JT. 1985. A user-oriented model of the soil water balance in wheat. In Day W, Atkin R K (eds) Wheat Growth and Modeling. Plenum Press, New York, New York, USA. Pp. 293-305.

Santhosh Mithra VS, Sreekumar J and Ravindran CS. 2012. Computer simulation of cassava growth: a tool for realizing the potential yield. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science. DOI:10.1080/03650340.2011.653681.

Singh U, Matthews RB, Griffin TS, Ritchie JT, Hunt LA and Goenaga R. 1998. Modelling growth and development of root and tuber crops. Tsuji GY et al. (eds) Understanding options for agricultural production: 129-156.

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Modelling the growth, yield, and future climate suitability of underutilized tropical tuber crops-‘aroids’: A review. (2024). Current Horticulture, 11(3), 3–8. https://doi.org/10.48165/chr.2023.11.3.1