Effect of scarification on biochemical activities of aged seeds in guava (Psidium guajava )

Authors

  • Santosh Kumari Department of Horticulture, College of Horticulture, Maharana Pratap Horticultural University, Karnal -132 001, Haryana, India
  • Arvind Malik Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar- 125 004, Haryana, India
  • Rajesh Mor Department of Horticulture, College of Horticulture, Maharana Pratap Horticultural University, Karnal -132 001, Haryana, India
  • Sonu Kumar Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar- 125 004, Haryana, India
  • M L Jat Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar- 125 004, Haryana, India
  • Jaipal Jaipal Department of Horticulture, College of Agriculture, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar- 125 004, Haryana, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/chr.2023.11.2.14

Keywords:

Seed quality, Scarification, Peroxidase, Dehydrogenase, Electrical conductivity

Abstract

The study was carried out on fresh, one, two and three year aged seeds of guava (Psidium guajava L. ) L-49 (Sardar) in the  laboratoryof Department of Seed Science and Technology, CCS HAU, Hisar, during 2018-2019. The seeds were subjected to  different seed scarification treatments, viz. hot water treatment at 80°C for 1 minute, concentrated sulphuric acid for quick dip  and water soaking for 48 hr. The seeds were assessed for peroxidase activity, dehydrogenase activity and electrical conductivity.  Hot water treatment at 80°C for 1 minute resulted into maximum peroxidase activity (710.0) and dehydrogenase activity (0.233) but  minimum electrical conductivity (11.02). It is concluded that seeds treated with hot water treatment at 80°C for 1 minute showed  maximum peroxidase, dehydrogenase activities and minimum electrical conductivity which reflects that better seed quality. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOSA 1983. Seed Vigor Testing Handbook. East Lansing.

Ahmadvand G, Soleimani F, Saadatian B and Pouya M. 2012. Effects of seed priming on germination and emergence traits of two soybean cultivars under salinity stress. International Research Journal of Applied Basic Science 3(2): 234-241.

Cavallaro V, Maucieri C and Barbera A C. 2014. Lolium multiflorum Lam. cvs germination under simulated olive mill wastewater salinity and pH stress. Ecological Engineering 71: 113-17.

Bairwa S K, Singh Navab, Verma Harish and Asarey Ram. 2020. Analysis of attitude of fruit growers towards guava (Psidium guajava) cultivation in Sawai Madhopur district of Rajasthan, India. Current Horticulture 8(1): 33-36.

Cakmal T, Atici O , Agar1G and Sunar S. 2010. Natural aging related biochemical changes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) seeds stored for 42 years. International Journal of Plant Sciences 1:1001-006.

Chang S M and Sung J M. 1998. Deteriorative changes in primed sweet corn seeds during storage. Seed Sci. Technol 26:613-26.

Kalyani M., Bharad S G and Parameshwar P. 2014. Effect of growth regulators on seed germination in guava. International Journal on Biological Sciences 5: 81-91.

Kapoor N , Arya A , Siddiqui, Mohd. Asif , Kumar H and Amir A. 2011. Physiological and biochemical changes during seed deterioration in aged seeds of rice (Oryza sativa L). American Journal of Plant Physiology 6(1):28-35.

Kalsa K K., Tomer R P S and Abebie B.2011.Effects of storage duration and hydro-priming on seed germination and vigour of Common vetch. Journal of Science and Development 1(1): 65-73.

Lamichhane J R., Debaeke P , Steinberg C , You M. P, Barbetti M J and Aubertot J N. 2018. Abiotic and biotic factors affecting crop seed germination and seedling emergence: a conceptual framework. Plant and Soil 432: 1-28.

Machado neto N B , Custodio C C and Takaki M. 2001. Evaluation of naturally and artificially aged seeds of Phaseolus vulgaris L. Seed Sci. Technol 29:137-149.

Maldonado-Arciniegas F , Ruales C , Caviedes M., Ramírez D X and León-Reyes A. 2018. An evaluation of physical and mechanical scarification methods on seed germination of Vachellia macracantha (Humb. & Bonpl. ex Willd.) Seigler & Ebinger. Acta Agronómica 67: 120-125. https://doi.

org/10.15446/acag.v67n1.60696

Radha B.N , Channakeshava B C , Hullur N , Bhanuprakash K., Vishwanath K., Umesha, Divya B and Sarika G. 2014. Change in storage enzymes activities in natural and accelerated aged seed of maize (Zea mays L.). International Journal of Plant Sciences 9(2): 306-311.

Shannon L , Kay E , and Lew J. 1966. Peroxidase Isozymes from Horseradish Roots. I. Isolation and Physical Properties. Journal of Biological Chemistry 241(9): 2166–72.

Singh, S, Singh A K and Joshi H K. 2005.Prolong storability of Indian gooseberry (Emblica officinalis Gaertn.) under semiarid ecosystem of Gujarat. Indian Journal of Agricultural Science 75: 647-50.

Tabatabaei S A. 2015.The changes of germination characteristics and enzyme activity of barley seeds under accelerated ageing. Cercetari Agronimice in Moldova. 48(2): 61-67.

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Effect of scarification on biochemical activities of aged seeds in guava (Psidium guajava ) . (2024). Current Horticulture, 11(2), 44–47. https://doi.org/10.48165/chr.2023.11.2.14