Role of rootstocks in yield and quality of grapes (Vitis vinifera)  under semi-arid tropics of India: a review

R G Somkuwar; V S Ghule; N A Deshmukh; A K Sharma

doi:10.48165/chr.2023.11.2.1

Authors

R G Somkuwar ICAR- National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune 412 307, Maharashtra, India
V S Ghule ICAR- National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune 412 307, Maharashtra, India
N A Deshmukh ICAR- National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune 412 307, Maharashtra, India
A K Sharma ICAR- National Research Centre for Grapes, Pune 412 307, Maharashtra, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/chr.2023.11.2.1

Keywords:

Rootstock, Semi-arid tropics, Vinryard, Climatic conditions, Abiotic stresses, Stionic combination

Abstract

Grape (Vitis vinifera L.) cultivation is gaining importance under tropical and sub-tropical conditions of India by adapting advance crop techniques. The problems of detoriated soil, poor and shortage of water conditions affecting the grape production on own rooted vines, which results into use of rootstock in grape cultivation. There are large number of rootstocks available in grape cultivation according to different production constraints. Rootstock not only helps in withstanding vineyard in adverse climatic conditions but also help in improving yield and quality of. The rootstock Dogridge became popular among the grape growers due to its capabilities of overcoming abiotic stresses and better stionic combination. The rootstock suitable for one variety in a given location may not be suitable for the same variety on other location. Hence, choice of rootstock is varied among the different cultivars. In a view of better yield and quality of grapes, there should have better stock-scion compatibility which imparts high vigour into the scion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abu-Qaoud, H. 1999. Performance of different grape cultivars for rooting and grafting. An-Najah Univ. J. Res., 13: 1-8.

Anonymous. 2018. Horticultural Statistics at a Glance, 2018.

Government of India, New Delhi. 2020. Area and Production of Horticulture Crops: All India (National Horticultural Board)

APEDA, New Delhi. 2020. APEDA agri exchange database online (http://agriexchange.apeda.gov.in).

Baianoa, A, and Terraconeb, C. 2011. Effects of bud load on quality of Beogradska Besemena and Thompson Seedless table grapes and cultivar differentiation based on chemometrics of analytical indices. J. Sci. Food Agril.,

: 645–653.

Bica, D., Gay, G. Morando, A. Soave, E. 2000. Effects of rootstock and vitis vinifera genotype on photosynthetic parameters. Acta Hortic., 526.41.

Bobeica, N. Poni, S. Hilbert, G., Renaud, C., Gomes, E., Delrot, S. and Dai1, Z. 2015. Differential responses of sugar, organic acids and anthocyanins to source-sink modulation in Cabernet Sauvignon and Sangiovese grapevines. Frontiers in Plant Sci., 6:1-14.

Cetin, E. S., Altinoz, D., Tarcan, E., Baydar, N. G. 2011. Chemical composition of grape canes. Industrial Crops and Products, 34:994-998.

Clingeleffer, P., Morales, N. Davis, H. and Smith, H. 2019. The significance of scion x rootstock interactions. Vine and Wine OENO One Journal, 2: 335-346.

Cook, A. J. and Lider, L. A. 1964. Mineral composition of blooming time grape petiole in relation to rootstock and scion variety behaviour. Proc. Amer. Hort. Sci., 84:243- 254.

Dalbo, M. A., Schuck, E. and Basso, C. 2011. Influence of rootstock on nutrient content in grape petioles. Revista Brasileira de Fruticultura: 175-182.

Elaidy, A. A., Abo-Ogiala, A. M. and Khalf, I. R. 2019. Effect of different grape rootstocks on the growth, yield and quality of Superior grape under salt stress. Middle East J. of Agril. Res., 8 (1):167-175.

Ferroni, G. and Scalabrelli, G. 1995. Effect of rootstock on vegetative activity and yield in grapevine. Acta Horticulturae, 388: 37-42.

Frioni, T., Biagioni, A., Squeri, C., Tombesi, S., Gatti, M. and Poni, S. 2020. Grafting cv. Grechetto Gentile vines to new M4 rootstock improves leaf gas exchange and water status as compared to commercial 1103P rootstock. Agronomy, 10, 708:1-14.

Gargin, S. and Altindisli, A. 2014. A Research on the affinity coefficients of Red Globe grape variety with 140 R, 41 B rootstocks. BIO Web of Conferences, 3, 01004.

Gautier, A. T., Cookson, S. J. Lagalle, L. Ollat, N. and Marguerit, E. 2020. Influence of the three main genetic, backgrounds of grapevine rootstocks on petiolar nutrient concentrations of the scion, with a focus on phosphorus. OENO One, 1: 1-13.

Ghule, V. S., Zagade, P. M. Bhor, V. A. and Somkuwar, R. G. 2019. Rootstock Affects Graft Success, Growth and Physiological Parameters of Grape Varieties (Vitis vinifera L.). Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci., 8(01): 799-805.

Ghule, V.S. Ranpise, S.A. Somkuwar, R.G. Kulkarni, S.S. Wagh, R.S. et al. 2021. Effect of rootstocks on growth parameters of red globe grapevines (Vitis vinifera L.). Int. J of Chem.Studies, 9(1): 3483-3487.

Goufo, P., Singh, R. K. and Cortez, I. 2020. A reference list of phenolic compounds (including Stilbenes) in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) roots, woods, canes, stems, and leaves, Antioxidants, 9, 398:1-37.

Hamdan, A. J. S and Basheer-Salimia, R. 2010. Preliminary compatibility between some table-grapevine scion and phylloxera resistant rootstock cultivars. Jordan J. of Agril. Sci., 6 (1): 1-10.

Hifny, H. A., Baghdady, G. A., Abdrabboh, G. A., Sultan, M. Z. and Shahda, M. A. 2016. Effect of rootstocks on growth, yield and fruit quality of Red Globe grape. Annals of Agric. Sci., Moshtohor, 54(2):339-344.

Ibacache, A. G. and Carlos, S. B. 2009. Influence of rootstocks on nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium content in petioles of four table grape varieties. Chilean J. of Agril. Res., 69 (4): 503-508.

Kalbhor, J. N., Shelke, T. S., Mungare, T. S. and Shikhamany, S. D. 2017. An approach to determine the preferential absorption of nutrients by different varieties and rootstocks of grape through vineyard surveys. Green Farming, 8

(4):901-906.

Keller, M., Kummer, M., and Vasconcelos, M. C. 2001. Reproductive growth of grapevines in response to nitrogen supply and rootstock. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res., 7: 12-18.

Kim, C. S., Lee, C. H., Park, H. S. and Lee, G. P. 2005. In vitro grafting of grape with phylloxera resistant rootstock cultivars. Vitis, 44(4):195-196.

Kose B., Karabulut B. and Ceylan K. 2014. Effect of Rootstock on Grafted Grapevine Quality. Europ. J. Hort. Sci., 79 (4):197–202.

Manjuvani, B. 2012. Influence of rootstocks on petiole nutrient content, yield, quality and shelf life of table varieties of grapes. A Ph.D. thesis submitted to DR.Y.S.R. Horticultural University.

Marin, D., Garcia, R., Eraso, J., Urrestarazu, J., Miranda, C., Royo, J. B. et al. 2019. Evaluation of the agronomic performance of Syrah and Tempranillo when grafted on 12 rootstocks. Vitis, 58 (Special Issue): 111–118.

Menora, B. N. Joshi, V., Kumar, N. P. and Kalyan, Y. V. 2018. Influence of different rootstocks on growth and yield of commercial grape varieties. Int. J. Pure App. Biosci., 6 (1): 1198-1203.

Miele, A. and Rizzon, L. A. 2017. Effect on the composition of cabernet sauvignon grape must. Rev. Bras. Frutic., 39(3):1-9.

Morales, M., Toro, G., Riquelme, A. Selles, G. and Pinto, M. 2014. Effect of different rootstocks on photosynthesis and nutritional response of grapevines cultivar ‘Sultanina’ under Flooding Stress. Proc. VIth Intl. Phylloxera Symp. Eds.: N. Ollat and D. Papura Acta Hort. 1045, ISHS 2014.

Nuzzo, V. and Matthews, M. 2006. Response of fruit growth and ripening to crop level in dry farmed cabernet sauvignon on four rootstock. Amer. J. of Enol. and Vitic., 57(3): 314-324.

Omer, A. D., Granett, J., Kocsis, L. and Downie, D. A. 1999. Preference and performance responses of California grape phylloxera to different Vitis rootstocks. J. Appl. Ent. 123: 341-346.

Padgett-Johnson, M., L.E. Williams, and M.A. Walker. 2000. The influence of Vitis riparia rootstock on water relations and gas exchange of Vitis vinifera cv. Carignane scion under non-irrigated conditions. Am. J. Enol. Vitic. 51(2):137–143.

Phillips, N., Reynolds, A. and Profio, F. D. 2015. Non-structural carbohydrate concentrations in dormant grapevine scion wood and rootstock impact propagation success and vine growth, Hort. Technology, 25 (4):536-550.

Possner, D. R. E. and Kliewer, W. M. 1985. The localisation of acids, sugars, potassium and calcium in developing grape berries. Vitis., 24: 229-240.

Reddy, B. M. C., Prakash, G. S. and Chadha, K. L. 1992. Effect of rootstocks on growth, yield and quality of Anab-e-Shahi grape. Proceedings of the International symposium on Recent Advances in Viticulture and Oneology, held from 14-17 February, 1992 at Hyderabad, India.188-193.

Reynolds, A. G. and Wardle, D. A. 2001. Rootstocks impact vine performance and fruit composition of grapes in British Columbia. Hort. Technology, 11: 419-427.

Ribereau-Gayon, P., Glories, Y., Maujean, A. and Dubourdieu, D. 2000. Handbook of Enology Volume 2: The Chemistry of Wine Stabilization and Treatments. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd., Chichester.

Rizk-Alla, M. S., Sabry, G. H. and Abd El-Wahab, M. A. 2011. Influence of Some Rootstocks on the Performance of Red Globe Grape Cultivar. J. of American Sci., 7 (4):71-81.

Robredo, P. M., Robledo, P., Manriquez, D., Molina, R. and Defilippi, B. G. 2011. Characterization of sugars and organic acids in commercial varieties of table grapes. Chilean J. of Agril. Res., 71(3):452-458.

Satisha, J., P. Raveendran and N.D. Rokade 2008: Changes in polyphenol oxidase activity during rooting of hardwood cuttings in three grape rootstocks under Indian conditions. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic. 29, 94–97.

Satisha, J., Somkuwar, R. G., Sharma, J., Upadhyay, A. K. and Adsule, P. G. 2010. Influence of rootstocks on growth, yield and fruit composition of Thompson Seedless grapes grown in the Pune region of India. South Afr. J. of Enol. and Vitic., 31(1): 1-8.

Satisha J., Oulkar, D. P., Banerjee, K., Sharma, J., Patil, A. G., Maske, S. R. and Somkuwar, R. G. 2013. Biochemically induced variations during some phenological stages in Thompson Seedless grapevines grafted on different rootstocks. S. Afr. J. Enol. Vitic., 34(1): 36-45.

Satisha J., Ramteke, S. D. Sharma, J. and Upadhyay, A. K. 2014. Moisture and salinity stress induced changes in biochemical constituents and water relations of different grape rootstock cultivars. International Journal of Agronomy, 2014:1-8.

Sharma, A. K. Somkuwar, R. G. and Sharmistha Naik.2022. Evaluation of ethyl oleate and potassium carbonate in drying on vine methodology of raisin making under tropical conditions of India. Current Hort., 10(2): 24–26.

Shelake, T. S., Shikhamany, S. D., Kalbhor, J. N. and Mungare, T. S. 2019. Performance of Thompson Seedless grape and its clones on Dogridge rootstock. Inter. J. of Hortic., 9(1): 1-9.

Siamak, S. B., Marzieh, A. and Paolo, S. 2018. Iranian grapevine rootstocks and hormonal effects on graft union, growth and antioxidant responses of Asgari Seedless grape. Hort. Plant Journal, 4 (1): 16-23.

Singh, M. and Sharma, J. K. 2005. Effect of rootstocks on disease intensity of Perlette grape vine. Haryana J. Hortic. Sci., 34:234-235.

Somkuwar, R. G. Satisha, J. and Ramteke, S. D. 2006. Effect of different rootstocks on fruitfulness in Thompson Seedless (Vitis vinifera L.) Grapes. Asian J. of Plant Sci., 5:150-152.

Somkuwar, R.G., P.B. Taware, D.D. Bondage and S. Navale. 2012: Root length, root mass, and distribution of dry matter in different parts of ‘Thompson Seedless’ grapevine grafted on different rootstocks in heavy soil of Maharashtra. Turk. J. Agric. For. 36, 543–552.

Somkuwar, R. G., Satisha, J. and Ramteke, S. D. 2013. Berry weight, quality and cane biochemistry changes in relation to cane thickness of own-rooted and grafted ‘Tas-A Ganesh’ grape. J. Hortl. Sci., 8(1):30-34.

Somkuwar, R. G., Bhange, M. A., Upadhyay, A. K. and Ramteke, S. D. 2014, a. Interaction effect of rootstocks on gas exchange parameters, biochemical changes and nutrient status in Sauvignon Blanc wine Grapes. J. of Adv. in Agril. 3(3):218-25.

Somkuwar, R. G., Jogaiah, S. Sawant, S. D. Taware, P. B. Bondage, D. D. and Itroutwar, P. 2014, b. Rootstocks influence the growth, biochemical contents and disease incidence in Thompson Seedless grapevines. British Journal of Applied Science & Technology, 4(6): 1030-

Somkuwar, R. G., Taware, P. B. Bhange, A. M. Sharma, J. and Khan, I. 2015. Influence of different rootstocks on growth, photosynthesis, biochemical composition and nutrient contents in Fantasy Seedless grapes. Int. J. of Fruit Sci., 00:1-16.

Somkuwar, R. G., Bhange, M., Sharma, J., Upadhyay, A. K. and Khan, I. 2017.Interaction of biochemical and nutritional status of nodal section with rooting success in grape rootstock. J. of Environment Biology, 38: 115-121.

Somkuwar, R. G., Bhor, V. A., Ghule, V. S. Hakale, D., Shabeer, A. and Sharma, A. K. 2021. Rootstock affects stress relieving enzymatic activity during bud break in ‘Red Globe’ grapevine under semi-arid condition. Vitis,

:93–99.

Sommer, K. J, Islam, M. T. and Clingeleffer, P. R. 2001. Sultana fruitfulness and yield as influenced by season, rootstock and trellis type. Australian J. of Grape and Wine Res.,7: 19-26.

Tambe, T. B. 1999. Ph.D. (Agri.) Rootstock studies in grapes (Vitis species). Thesis submitted to MPKV, Rahuri.

Tambe, T. B. and Gawade, M. H. 2004. Influence of rootstocks on vine vigour, yield and quality of grapes. Acta Hortic., 662.37.

Tangolar, S. G., Tangolar, S., Kelebek, H. and Topcu, S. 2016. Determination of phenolics, sugars, organic acids and antioxidants in the grape variety Kalecik Karasi under different bud loads and irrigation amounts. Korean J. Hortic. Sci. Technol., 34(3):495-509.

Tripathi, P. C. Yogeesha, H. S., Kanupriya and Rajashankar.2018. Management of genetic resources of perennial horticultural crops: a review. Current Hort. 6(1): 3–14.

Ulas, S., Guler, A. and Candemir, A. 2014. Effect of rootstocks on different physiological parameters in some grape cultivars. Turkish J. of Agril. and Natural Sci., 1:1097-1100.

Verma, S. K., Singh, S. K. and Krishna, H. 2010. The effect of certain rootstocks on the grape cultivar ‘Pusa Urvashi’ (Vitis vinifera L.), Int. J. of Fruit Sci., 10 (1), 16-28.

Vijaya, D. and Rao, B. S. 2015. Effect of rootstocks on petiole mineral nutrient composition of grapes (Vitis vinifera L. cv. Thompson seedless). Current Biotica, 8 (4):367-374.

Vijaya, D., Veena Joshi, Reddy, G. R., Anita Kumari, D. and Rao, B. S. 2019. Effect of rootstock-scion interaction on petiole nutrient content, bud break and yield of three commercial grape cultivars. Agril. Res. J., 56 (1):84-91.

Vrsic, S. Pulko, B. Kocsis, L. 2016. Effects of rootstock genotypes on compatibility, biomass and the yield of Welschriesling. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 43 (2): 92-99.

Williams, L. E. and Smith, R. J. 1991. The effect of rootstocks and nitrogen fertilization on the growth and yield of Chardonnay grapevines in New York. Amer. J. Enol. Viticult., 30:29-33.

Wunderer, W., Fardossi, A. and Schmucken, S. 1999. Influence of three different rootstock varieties and two training systems on the efficiency of the grape cultivar Gruner Veltliner in Klosterneuburg, Mitteilungen Klosterneuburg, Rebe und Wein. Obstbau und Fruchtevrwertung, 49:57-64.

Zapata, C., Deleens, E. Chaillou, S. and Magne, C. 2004. Partitioning and mobilization of starch and N reserves in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). J. Plant Physiol., 161: 1031- 1040.