Analysis of benefit: cost ratio in drip irrigation and fertigation in greater yam (Dioscorea alata) + maize (Zea mays) intercropping system

M Nedunchezhiyan; Kalidas Pati; Kalidas Pati; V B S Chauhan; R Arutselvan

doi:10.48165/

Authors

M Nedunchezhiyan Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar 751 019, Odisha, India
Kalidas Pati Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar 751 019, Odisha, India
Kalidas Pati Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar 751 019, Odisha, India
V B S Chauhan Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar 751 019, Odisha, India
R Arutselvan Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar 751 019, Odisha, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Tuber equivalent yield, Gross return, Net return, Intercropping, Fertigation, Drip irrigation

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Regional Centre, ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India, during 2015-16 and 2016-17 to study drip irrigation and fertigation in greater yam (Dioscorea alata L.) + maize (Zea mays L.) intercropping system. The treatments I2F4 and I2F3 resulted in 31.8 and 29.9% higher tuber equivalent yield, respectively than the control. Drip irrigation increased fertilizer responsiveness in greater yam + maize intercropping system. However, response to fertilizer was higher under partial deficit irrigation. Thus 20% more fertilizers can be recommended under drip fertigation than surface irrigation with soil application. Drip irrigation reduced cost on weeding and irrigation. The total cost reduction (excluding capital cost, harvesting and threshing) was about 8.3% (` 11,500/ha) and 7.1% (` 9,900/ha) due to drip irrigation at I1F2 and I2F2, respectively compared to surface flood irrigation at the same level of fertilizer application (control). The gross and net returns in treatment I1F2 were 5.2 and 3.1% higher, respectively than the control, saving 21.2% irrigation water. The treatment I3F2 resulted in 21.1 and 24.7% higher gross and net returns, respectively than the control. Thus, drip fertigation increased water- and fertilizer-use efficiency (20%).

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bhargavi B, Behera U K, Rana K S, Singh R, Prasad S, Pandey R N and Singh G. 2019. Crop diversification with high-value crops for higher productivity and profitability under irrigated ecosystem. Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(4): 440-4.

Dhawan B D. 2002. Technological change in Indian irrigated agriculture: A study of water saving methods. Commonwealth Publishers, New Delhi, India.

Gangaiah B, Prasadbabu M B B, Latha P C, Singh T V and Rao P R. 2019. Plastic mulch cultivation of rice (Oryza sativa) in India in light of dwindling water resources. Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(4): 458-63.

Gomez K A and Gomez A A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Maheswarappa H P and Krishnakumar V. 2019. An overview on water management in coconut (Cocos nucifera). Indian Journal of Agronomy 64(4): 431-9.

Narayanamoorthy A. 2005. Economics of drip irrigation in sugar cane cultivation: Case study of a farmer from Tamil Nadu. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 60(2): 235-48.

Nedunchezhiyan M, Byju G and Jata S K. 2021a. Drip fertigation for greater yam (Dioscorea alata) and maize (Zea mays) intercropping. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 91(9): 1302-6.

Nedunchezhiyan M, Byju G, Ravi V and James George. 2018. Effect of fertigation schedule on production potential, quality and nutrient uptake of elephant-foot yam (Amorphophallus

paeoniifolius). Current Horticulture 6(1): 19-26. Nedunchezhiyan M, Mukherjee A, Byju G, Ravi V and James George. 2016. Growth, dry matter production and nutrient uptake of elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson) as influenced by drip irrigation and fertigation levels. Journal of Root Crops 42(1): 22-32. Nedunchezhiyan M, Suja G and Ravi V. 2022. Tropical root and tuber crops-based cropping systems-a review. Current Horticulture 10(1): 14-22. http://doi.org/10.5958/2455- 7560.2022.00003.6

Nedunchezhiyan M, Suresh Kumar J and Biswanath Sahoo. 2021b. Effect of weed control on growth, dry-matter production and partitioning in elephant-foot yam [Amorphophallus paeoniifolius (Dennst.) Nicolson]. Current Horticulture 9(1): 40-4.

Nedunchezhiyan M. 2017. Drip irrigation and fertigation effects on corm yield, water and fertilizer use efficiency and economics in elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius). Indian Journal of Agronomy 62(4): 519-24.

Reddy T Y and Reddi G H S. 2010. Principles of agronomy, 4th edn., Kalyani Publishers, Ludhiana, India.

SAS. 2010. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA. Singh A and Singh K G. 2021. Effect of drip irrigation, fertigation and plastic mulching on growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max). Indian Journal of Agronomy 66(1): 56-60. Sunitha S, George J and Sreekumar J. 2016. Productivity of cassava as affected by precision management under humid tropical environment in India. Acta Horticulturae 1118(3): 17-23.

Sunitha S, George J, Suja G, Ravi V, Haripriya S and Sreekumar J. 2018. Irrigation schedule for maximum corm yield and water productivity in elephant foot yam (Amorphophallus paeoniifolius). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 88(7): 1013-7.