Response of upland taro (Colocasia esculenta) to varying water regimes under humid tropical conditions of India

Authors

  • S Sunitha ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram-695 017, Kerala, India
  • J Sreekumar ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram-695 017, Kerala, India
  • J Suresh Kumar ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram-695 017, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Cormel yield, Drip irrigation, Water stress, Water-use efficiency

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted on taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) during 2017, 2018 and 2019 with three spells of irrigation (irrigation for 2 months and remaining period under stress, irrigation for 4 months and remaining period under stress, irrigation for 6 months) and four levels of drip irrigation, viz. 75%, 100%, 125% and 150% of water requirement of the crop (ETc) in factorial design. Pooled analysis of three years data revealed significant difference in growth and yield as well as water-use efficiency under stress and non-stress conditions. Moisture stress two and four months after planting resulted in reduction in leaf area index (-21 and -19%), number of tillers ( -27 and -6%), root to shoot ratio (-60 and -43%), cormel to corm ratio (-69 and -53%), cormel yield (-58 and -28%), water-use efficiency (-32 and -36%) and increase in corm yield (+34 and +52%) respectively, compared to no stress. Drip irrigation for six months @ 100% ETc recorded optimum growth, cormel yield (21.08 tonnes/ha) with water-use efficiency (0.4 g/L) in upland condtion. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abd El-Aal M M M, El-Anany A M A and Rizk S M. 2019. Rationalization of water consumption for taro plant through the rationing of irrigation and expand the plant ability to resist stress conditions. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science 29(4): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.9734/ijpss/2019/ v29i430149

Allen R G, Pereira L S, Raes D and Smith M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration, FAOIrrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.

Cameron Wagg, Sheldon HannYulia and Kupriyanovich Sheng Li. 2021. Timing of short period water stress determines potato plant growth, yield and tuber quality. Agricultural Water Management 247: 31. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.agwat.2020.106731

Manyatsi A M, Mhazo N, Mkhatshwa M, Masarirambi M T. 2011. The Effect of Different in-situ Water Conservation Tillage Methods on Growth and Development of Taro (Colocasia esculenta L.) Asian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 3(1): 11-18. ISSN: 2041-3890.

Mare, R M. 2010. ‘Taro (Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott) yield and quality in response to planting date and organic fertilisation.’ Ph.D. Thesis. University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.

Mattar, Mohamed, Zin Elabadin Tarek et al. 2021. Effects of different surface and subsurface drip irrigation levels on growth traits, tuber yield, and irrigation water use efficiency of potato crop. Irrigation Science 39(1):517-33. 10.1007/ s00271-020-00715-x.

Mabhaudhi T, Modi A T, Beletse YG. 2013. Response of taro (Colocasia esculenta L. Schott) landraces to varying water regimes under a rain shelter. Agricultural Water Management 121(1): 102-112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2013.01.009

SAS, 2010. SAS Institute Inc, Cary, NC, USA. Unlu M, Kanber R, Senyigit U, Onaran H and Diker K. 2006. Trickle and sprinkler irrigation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in Middle Anatolian Region in Turkey. Agricultural Water Management 79: 43-71. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.agwat.2005.02.004

Vieira, Gustavo H S, Guilherme Peterle, Jéssica B L, Gabriel P, Carlos M M. Poloni, J N C and Paola A V L M. 2017. Strategies for taro (Colocasia esculenta) irrigation Presented at 2017 Irrigation Show & Education Conference, Orange County Convention Center, Orlando, Florida, USA.

Published

2024-02-16

How to Cite

Response of upland taro (Colocasia esculenta) to varying water regimes under humid tropical conditions of India . (2024). Current Horticulture, 11(1), 50–53. https://doi.org/10.48165/