Morphological and physiological responses of CMD resistant cassava (Manihot esculenta) genotypes to nutrient regimes

S Sunitha; M N Sheela; J Suresh  Kumar; T Makeshkumar

doi:10.48165/

Authors

S Sunitha ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
M N Sheela ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
J Suresh Kumar ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India
T Makeshkumar ICAR-Central Tuber Crops Research Institute, Thiruvananthapuram, Kerala, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Leaf area index, Nutrition, Tuber bulking rate, Tuber yield, Varietal response

Abstract

The field studies were carried out on cassava ( Manihot esculenta Crantz) varieties resistant to cassava mosaic disease (V1-CR43-2, V2-15 S 59, V3-15 S 409 , V4-15 S 154, V5-CR43-7, V6-8S 501-2, V7-CR24-4, V8- 15S-436) and three levels of nutrient doses (F1-75:50:75, F2- 100:50:100 and F3- 125:50:125 kg NPK/ha) in spilt plot design during 2018-19 and 2019-20 to assess the response of varieties to nutrition. There was significant difference in morphological and physiological parameters among varieties, but not with different nutrient doses. The rate of leaf production was more 4-6 months after planting (34-40%) and percentage retention was less for first season crop (55.6-41.4%) compared to second season (77.2-52.5 %). Though not significant, higher nutrition levels recorded more number of green leaves as well as leaf area at most of the stages. Tuber bulking rate was 0.19 to 0.37 g/day during initial two months. The rate increased and maximum bulking was recorded between 4 and 8 months (2.15-6.71 g/day). Pooled analysis also showed a gradual increase in tuber yield with nutrient levels, but was not significant (7%). The varieties responded differently to nutrients with respect to tuber yield. F3 recorded higher tuber yield (66.9 t/ha) than F1 (45.7 t/ha) in V7 and V6 recorded highest tuber yield with F2 level of nutrition (71.1 t/ha). F1 was found optimum for rest of the varieties.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adalton Mazetti Fernandes, Bruno Gazola, Jesion Geibel da Silva Nunes, Emerson Loli Garcia and Magali Leonel. 2017. Yield and nutritional requirements of cassava in response to potassium fertilizer in the second cycle. Journal of Plant Nutrition 40(20): 2785-2796. DOI: 10.1080/01904167.2017.1382520

Byju G. and Suja G. 2020. Chapter Five - Mineral nutrition of cassava, Advances in Agronomy 159: 169-235. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agron.2019.08.005

Daryanto, L. Wang, and Jacin P.A. 2016. Drought effects on root and tuber production: a meta-analysis

May–August 2024 SUNITHA, ET AL.

Agricultural Water Management 176 : 122-31. 10.1016/j.agwat.2016.05.019

El-Sharkawy M.A. 2014. Global warming: causes and impacts on agroecosystems productivity and food security with emphasis on cassava comparative advantage in the tropics/subtropics. Photosynthetica 52: 161-78.10.1007/s11099-014-0028-7

El-Sharkawy, M.A., Mejia de Tafur, S. and López, Y. 2012. Cassava productivity, photosynthesis, ecophysiology, and response to environmental stresses in the tropics: A multidisciplinary approach to crop improvement and sustainable production. In: Cassava in the Third Millennium: Modern Production, Processing, Use, and Marketing Systems; Bernardo, O.P., Hernán, C., (Eds.) CIAT Publication No. 377; Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, CO, USA, pp. 29–88.

Ezui, K.S., Franke, A.C., Leffelaar, P.A., Mando, A., van Heerwaarden, J., Sanabria, J., Sogbedji, J. and Giller, K.E. 2017. Water and radiation use efficiencies explain the effect of potassium on the productivity of cassava. European J. Agron. 83: 28–39.

Ezui, K.S., Franke, A.C., Mando, A., Ahiabor, B.D.K., Tetteh, F.M. and Sogbedji, J.2015. Fertiliser requirements for balanced nutrition of cassava across eight locations in West Africa. Field Crop. Res. 185: 69–78.

Jatav, M.K., Saroj, P.L., Chakrabarti, S.K. and Dua, V.K. 2023. Introduction of potato (Solanum tuberosum) in hot arid region of north western Rajasthan. Current Horticulture 11 (1): 22-25.

Mutchima Phun-iam, Somchai Anusontpornperm, Suphicha Thanachit, and Irb Kheoruenromne 2018. Yield response of cassava Huay Bong 80 variety grown in an Oxyaquic Paleustult to cassava starch waste and nitrogen fertilizer. Agriculture and Natural Resources 52 (6): 573-80.

Mwamba, S., Kaluba, P., Moualeu-Ngangue, D.,Winter, E., Chiona, M., Chishala, B.H.,

Munyinda, K. and Stützel, H. 2021. Physiological and Morphological Responses of Cassava Genotypes to Fertilization Regimes in Chromi-Haplic Acrisols Soils. Agronomy 11: 1757. https:// doi.org/10.3390/ agronomy11091757

Nedunchezhiyan, M., Suja, G. and Ravi, V. 2022. Tropical root and tuber crops based cropping systems-A review. Current Horticulture 10 (1) : 14-22.

Pandey, R., Paul, V., Das, M., Meena, M. and Meena, R. 2017. Plant growth analysis. 10.13140/RG.2.2.21657.72808. Sunitha, S., Akash, A.U., Sheela, M.N. and Suresh Kumar, J. 2023. The water footprint of root and tuber crops. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023- 02955-1

Sunitha, S., George J. and Sreekumar, J. 2016. Productivity of cassava as affected by precision management under humid tropical environment in India. Acta Hortic.1118 (3) : 17-23.

Sunitha, S., James George and Sreekumar, J. 2013. Productivity of cassava (Manihot esculenta) as affected by drip fertigation in the humid tropics. Journal of Root Crops, 2013, 39 (2): 100-04.

Sunitha,S., James George and Sreekumar, J. 2018. Response of Cassava (Manihot esculenta) minisetts under varying levels of drip fertigation. Indian Journal of Agronomy 63: 366-71.

Sunitha, Sarojini Amma and James George 2018. Water productivity of micro irrigated cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) In: Innovations and Challenges in micro irrigation, Vol. 9: Management strategies for water use efficiency and micro irrigated crops Principles, practices and performance Megh R. Goyal and Pandian B. J. (Eds). Apple academic press, Canada. (ISBN: 13:978-0-42906- 060-1), pp 63-70.

Turyagyenda, L.F., Kizito, E.B., Baguma, Y. and Osiru D. 2013. Evaluation of Ugandan cassava germplasm for drought tolerance. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5 (3): 212-26.