Development of Water Quality Criteria for Fenneropenaeus indicus Against Arsenic by Flow-through System in the Central West Coast of India at Goa

Authors

  • Manoj Singh Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University) Mullana-Ambala, Haryana 133207, India.
  • Mukesh Yadav Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University) Mullana-Ambala, Haryana 133207, India.
  • Raj Singh Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University) Mullana-Ambala, Haryana 133207, India.
  • Vikas Kumar Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University) Mullana-Ambala, Haryana 133207, India.
  • Nirmala Sehrawat Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University) Mullana-Ambala, Haryana 133207, India
  • Sushil Kumar Upadhyay Assistant Professor, Department of Biotechnology, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana-Ambala, Haryana 133207, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Toxicant, Flow-through system, Acute toxicity, Water quality criteria, Salinity

Abstract

Toxicants as chemical hazard are very common  to the surroundings that cause adverse effects on  health and environment. The outbreak of toxicity  can easily be identified in the aquatic  environment and necessary methodology can be  applied for water quality criteria development by  reducing common sources of toxic elements in  the environment. The concern over the use of  toxicants causing environmental threat in form of  pollution and toxicity risk to non-target  organisms has been reported worldwide. Thus, the study has been conducted to estimate the  toxic effect of arsenic through acute assay with  white prawn. Individuals of larval stage (0.25 ±  0.10g) were acclimated under test conditions  (salinity 31.0 ± 1.0%, temperature 29 ± 1.0 ºC,  dissolved oxygen 5.25 ± 0.2mg.l-1, pH 8.2 ± 0.5) and exposed to arsenic at 0.15, 0.30, 0.60, 1.20  and 2.40mg.l-1 with seawater as control. Tests  were run in Flow through system with the above  five concentrations in duplicate. Mortality was  observed for different time intervals of 24h for  next four days, lethal dose concentration (LC50)  and 95% of confidence limit was calculated using  statistical software such as Probit analysis  method. Mean LC50 value after 96h of exposure  duration was estimated as 0.08mg.l-1. The results  of the study were highly helpful in developing  water quality criteria for this region. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Almela, C., Clemente, M.J., Vélez, D. and Montoro, R. (2006). Total arsenic, inorganic arsenic, lead and cadmium contents in edible seaweed sold in Spain. Food Chem. Toxicol. 44: 1901. 2. Abulude, F.O., Fapohunda, O.O. and Awanlemhen, B.E. (2006). Determination of some heavy metals in Procambaris clakii, Palaenon sp., Macrobrachium vollenhovenii and Penaeus notalis from the Coastal Water of Ondo State, Nigeria. J. Anim. Vet. Adv. 5 (1): 38–41.

Alabaster, J.S. and Abram, F.S.H. (1965). Development and use of a direct method of evaluating toxicity to fish. In: Advances in water pollution research, Proc. 2nd Int. Conf., Tokyo, 1964, (ed. O. Jaag), Pergamon Press, Oxford. 1: 41–54.

A.P.H.A. (1992). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 18th Ed. American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC.

Bhattacharya, A.K. and Sarkar, S.K. (2003). Impact of overexploitation of shellfish: Northeastern coast of India. Ambio. 32: 70-76.

Buikema, A.L., Niedertehner, R.R. and Cairns, J. (1982). Biological monitoring Part IV toxicity testing. Water Res. 16: 239–262.

Carlin, D.J., Naujokas, M.F., Bradham, K.D., et al. (2016). Arsenic and environmental health: State of the science and future research opportunities. Env. Hlth. Perspect. 124: 890. 8. Chiu, H.F., Ho, S.C. and Yang, C.Y. (2004). Lung cancer mortality reduction after installation of tap-water supply system in an arseniasis-endemic area in Southwestern Taiwan. Lung Cancer 46: 265.

Connor, P.M. and Wilson, K.W. (1972) A Continuous flow apparatus for assessing the toxicity. J. Exp. Marine Biol. Ecol. 9: 209–215.

European, C.B. (2006) European chemicals bureau: Toxicology and chemical substances, testing methods (Annex V). 9p http://ecb.jrc.it/DOCUMENTS/Testing Methods/ANNEXV/ C01web 1992.

G.E.S.A.M.P. (IMO/FAO/UNESCO/WMO/WHO/IAEA/UN/UNEP Joint Group of Experts on the Scientific Aspects of Marine Pollution) (1986). Review of potentially harmful substances– Arsenic, Mercury and Selenium. Reports and Studies 28: 73.

Grasshoff K, Ehrhardt M and Kremling K (Eds.). Methods of Sea Water Analysis, 3rd ed., pp. 75–89, 1999; 159–196, VCH, Wainheins, Germany.

Guha Mazumder, D.N., De, B.K., Santra, A., et al. (2001). Randomized placebo-controlled trial of 2,3-dimercapto-1-propanesulfonate (DMPS) in therapy of chronic arsenicosis due to drinking arsenic-contaminated water. J Toxicol Clin Toxicol 39: 665.

Laine, J.E., Bailey, K.A., Rubio-Andrade, M. et al. (2015). Maternal arsenic exposure, arsenic methylation efficiency, and birth outcomes in the Biomarkers of Exposure to Arsenic (BEAR) pregnancy cohort in Mexico. Env. Hlth. Perspect. 123: 186.

Laxminarayana, A., Pillai, S.M., Surendran, K.K. and Sasidharan, C.S. (1995). Backyard hatchery technology for the white prawn, Fenneropenaeus indicus. CIBA Bull. 8: 1–13. 16. Magos, L. (1990). Marine health hazards of anthropogenic and natural origin. In: UNEP: Technical annexes to the report on the state of the marine environment. UNEP Reg Seas Rep Stud 114/2: 447–507.

Neff, J.M. (1997). Review: Ecotoxicology of arsenic in the marine environment. Env. Toxicol. Chem. 16: 917–927.

Orloff, K., Mistry, K. and Metcalf, S. (2009). Biomonitoring for environmental exposures to arsenic. J. Toxicol. Env. Hlth. B Crit. Rev. 12: 509.

Phongdara, A., Chotigeat, W., Chandumpai, A., Tanthana, C. and Duangtong, P. (1999). Identification of Penaeus merguiensis and Fenneropenaeus indicus by RAPD-PCR derived DNA Markers. Sci. Asia 25: 143–151.

Rand, G.M., Wells, P.G. and McCarty, L.S. (1995). Introduction to aquatic toxicology. In: Rand, G.M. (Ed.), Fundamentals of Aquatic toxicology: Effects, Environmental Fate, and Risk Assessment, second ed. Taylor & Francis, Washington, DC, pp.3–67.

Rahman, M., Tondel, M., Ahmad, S.A. and Axelson, O. (1998). Diabetes mellitus associated with arsenic exposure in Bangladesh. Am. J. Epidemiol. 148: 198.

Rand, G.M. and Petrocelli, S.R. (1985). Fundamentals of aquatic Toxicology: Methods and applications. Washington: Hemisphere Pub. Corp.

Richardson, M.L. (1993). Epilogue. In: Ecotoxicology monitoring (Ed. Richardson ML) New York VCH Verlagsgesellschaft. 335–343.

Soto, E.G., Rodriguez, D.P., Rodriguez, E.A., Mahia, P.L., Fernandez, E. and Zubieta, A.C. (1993). Inorganic As (III) and As (V) quantification in marine organisms. Marine Pollut. Bull. 26: 335–338.

Sprague, J.B. (1969). Measurement of pollutant toxicity to fish. 1. Bioassay methods for acute toxicity. Water Res. 3: 793–821.

Tisler, T. and Zagorc-Koncan, J. (2002). Acute and Chronic Toxicity of Arsenic to Some Aquatic Organisms. Bull. Env. Cont. Toxicol. 69: 421–429.

U.S. E.P.A. (1992). EPA Probit analysis program, version 1.5. Ecol Monit Res Div EMSL Cincinnati, OH.

Viera, L.R., Sousa, A., Frasco, M.F., Lima, I., Margado, F. and Guilhermino, L. (2008). Effects of benzopyrene, anthracene and a fuel oil on biomarkers of the common goby Pomatoschistus microps. Sci. Totl. Env. 395: 87–100.

Welsh, P.G., Lipton, J., Mebane, C.A. and Marr, J.C.A. (2008). Influence of flow-through and renewal exposures on the toxicity of copper to rainbow trout. Ecotoxicol. Env. Safety 69: 199– 208.

Downloads

Published

2019-12-25

Issue

Vol. 38 No. 2 (2019): Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences Zoology (Jul-Dec) 2019

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Development of Water Quality Criteria for Fenneropenaeus indicus Against Arsenic by Flow-through System in the Central West Coast of India at Goa . (2019). Bulletin of Pure & Applied Sciences- Zoology , 38(2), 144–149. https://doi.org/10.48165/