Behavioral Effect of Volatile Organic Compounds on Codling Moth Larvae Cydia Pomonella

Authors

  • Guermah Dyhia Laboratoire de production, sauvegarde des espèces menacées et des récoltes. Influence des variations climatiques. Département de biologie. Faculté des sciences biologiques et des sciences agronomiques. Université Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi-Ouzou 15000. Algérie.
  • Medjdoub-Bensaad Ferroudja Laboratoire de production, sauvegarde des espèces menacées et des récoltes. Influence des variations climatiques. Département de biologie. Faculté des sciences biologiques et des sciences agronomiques. Université Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi-Ouzou 15000. Algérie.
  • Pinier Centina Laboratoire de production, sauvegarde des espèces menacées et des récoltes. Influence des variations climatiques. Département de biologie. Faculté des sciences biologiques et des sciences agronomiques. Université Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi-Ouzou 15000. Algérie.
  • Leppik Ené Laboratoire de production, sauvegarde des espèces menacées et des récoltes. Influence des variations climatiques. Département de biologie. Faculté des sciences biologiques et des sciences agronomiques. Université Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi-Ouzou 15000. Algérie.
  • Frérot Brigitte Laboratoire de production, sauvegarde des espèces menacées et des récoltes. Influence des variations climatiques. Département de biologie. Faculté des sciences biologiques et des sciences agronomiques. Université Mouloud Mammeri de Tizi-Ouzou 15000. Algérie.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Cydia pomonella, volatile organic compounds, behavior, attractiveness

Abstract

The behavioral effect of 4 mixtures volatile  organic compounds tested separately is  evaluated on Cydia pomonella codling moth  larvae. The average attractiveness of the neonate  larvae of codling moth varies according to the  mixtures tested; it decreases proportionally with  the increase of the doses used and the duration of  experimentation. This study shows that neonate  larvae have a preference between the tested  mixtures, it shows an attractiveness for both  mixture B and D, but seem less attractive by  mixtures A and C. Variance analysis with two  classification criteria revealed no significant  differences for the organic compounds factor and  significant differences for the dose factor. The test  of Newman and Keuls at the threshold of 5%  highlights two homogeneous groups: A and B 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ansebo L, Ignell R, Löfqvist J, et Hansson BS (2005). Responses to sex pheromone and plant odours by olfactory receptor neurons housed in sensillaauricillica of the codling moth Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 51: 1066-1074.

Ascoli A, et Albert J.P (1985).Orientation behavior of second-instar larvae of eastern spruce budworm Choristoneurafumiferana (Clem.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in a y-type olfactometer. Journal of Chemical Ecology, Volume 11, Issue 7, pp 837–845.

Bäckman A.C, Bengtsson M, Borg-Karlson A.K, Liblikas O, et Witzgall P (2001). Volatils from apple Malus domestica eliciting antennal responses in female codling moth Cydia pomonella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): effect of plant injury and sampling technique. Z. Naturfosh. 56: 262-268.

Bradley SJ, et Suckling DM (1995). Factors influencing codling moth larval response to α‐farnesene. Entomologia Experimentaliset Applicata, Vol 75, issue 3: 221-227. 5. Casado D, Cemeno C, Avilla J, et Riba M(2006).Day night and phenological variation apple tree volatiles and electroantennogram responses in Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) Environmental Entomology 35:258-267.

Chauvin(1950). Le Transport Des Proies Chez Les Fourmis. Behaviour, Volume 2, Issue 1, pages 249 – 256.

Coracini M, Bengtsson M, Liblikas I, and Witzgall P(2004). Attraction of codling moth males to apple volatiles. Ent Exp Appl 110: 1-10.

Del Soccoro AP, PC Gregg and AJ Hawes (2010).Development of a synthetic plant volatile‐based attracticide for female noctuid moths. III. Insecticides for adult Helicoverpaarmigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).

Dethier VG (1947). Chemical insect attractants and repellents. Blakiston, Philadelphia. 10. Dicke and Sabelis, 1988;

Dicke M (2000). Chemical ecology of host-plant selection by herbivorous arthropods: a multitrophic perspective. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, Vol 28, Issue 7 : 601-617. 12. James DG, et Price TS (2004).Field-testing of methyl salicylate for recruitment and retention of beneficial insects in grapes and hops. Journal of Chemical Ecology 30: 1613-1628. 13. Jones O.T et Coaker T.H(1978). A basis for host plant finding in phytophagous larvae. Entomologia Experimental iset Applicata, vol 24 issue 3: 472-484.

Kaplan J(2012).Chemical Physics and Chemistry: NMR of chemically exchanging systems. Burlington, MA : Elsevier : 180 p.

Khan, M.J.; Drochner, W.; Steingass, H.; Islam, K.M.S (2008). Nutritive evaluation of some tree leaves from Bangladesh for feeding ruminant animals. Indian J. Anim. Sci., 78 (11): 1273-1277 16. Klingler J(1958). Die Bedeutung der Kohlendioxyd- Ausscheidung der wurzeln fur die orientierung der larven von Otiorrhynchussulcatus F, und and ererbodenvewhonender phytophagerinsektenarten. Mitt Schweiz Entomol Ges 31: 206-269.

Knight A.L, and Light D.M (2001). Attractans from Bartlett pear for codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.), larvae. Naturwissenschaften 88: 339-342.

Knight A.L, and Light D.M (2005). Factors affecting the differential capture of male and female codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in traps baited with ethyl-(E,Z)-2,4-decadienoate. Environ. Entomol 34: 1161-1169.

Knight MW, Sobhani H, Nordlander P et Halas NJ (2011). Photodetection with Active Optical Antennas. Sciences, Vol 332, issue 6030:702-704.

Landolt PJ, Brumley JA, Smithhisler CL, Biddik LL, et Hofstetter RW (2000). Apple fruit infested with codling moth are more attractive to neonate codling moth larvae and posses increased amounts of (E,E)-α-farnesene. Journal of Chemical Ecology 26: 1685-1699.

Light DM, Knight AL, Henrick CA, Rajapaska D, etLingren B (2001). A pear-derivd kairomone with pheromonal potency that attractants male and female codling moth, Cydia pomonella (L.) Naturwissenschaften88: 333-338.

Mondy N, Pracros P, Fermaud M, Corio-Costet M.F(1998). Olfactory and gustatory behavior by larvae of Lobesiabotrana in response to Botrytis cinerea. Entomol ExpAppl 88: 1-7. 23. Mumm R, et Dicke M(2010). Variation in natural plant products and the attraction of bodyguards involved in indirect plant defense. Revue canadienne de zoologie, 2010, 88(7): 628-667 24. Rembold H, Wallner P, et Singh AK (1989). Attraction of volatiles chickpea (Cicer arietinum) seed component to Heliothisarmigera larvae (Lep.,Noctuidae). Journal of Apple Entomology 107: 65-70 25. Rodriguez-Saona C, Parra L, Quiroz A et Isaacs R (2011). Variation in highbush blueberry floral volatile profiles as a function of pollination status, cultivar, time of day and flower part: implications for flower visitation by bees. Annals of Botany: 1-14.

Simpson M, Gurr GM, Simmons AT, Wratten SD, James DG, Leeson G, Nicol HI, et Orre-Gordon G(2011). Attract and reward: combining chemical ecology and habitat manipulation to enhance biological control in field crops. Journal of Applied Ecology 48: 580–590

Gombert J, Dupuy A, Prud’homme V, Dumortier J, Frerot B et Deneufbourg F(2014). Vers une strategie de protection integree pour lutter contre tychiusaureolus en luzerne porte-graine. Dixième Conférence Internationale Sur Les Ravageurs En Agriculture Montpellier, 9p.

Singh AK, et Mullick S (2002). Leaf volatiles as attraction for neonates Helicoverpaarmigera Hbn (Lep., Noctuidae) larvae. Journal of Apple Entomology 126: 14-19.

Sutherland ORW et Hutchins RFN (1972).Alpha farnesene a natural attractant for codling moth larvae. Nature 239: 170.

Sutherland ORW et Hutchins RFN (1973).Attraction of newly hatched codling moth larvae (Laspeyresia pomonella) to synthetic stereo-isomers of farnesene. Journal of insect physiology 19: 723-727.

Tóth M, Szentkirályi F, Vuts J, Letardi A, Tabilio MR, Jaastad G, et Knudsen GK(2009).Optimization of a Phenylacetaldehyde-Based Attractant for Common Green Lacewings (Chrysoperlacarneas.l.). journal of chemicalecology, Volume 35, Issue 4, 449–458.

Turlings TCJ, Tumlinson JH, et Lewis WJ (1990). Exploitation of herbivore-induced plant odors by host-seeking parasitic wasps. Science 250: 1251.

Visser JH (1986). Host odor perception in phytophagous insects. Annu Rev Entomol 31: 121-144. 34. Visser JH, et Avé DA (1978). General green leaf volatiles in the olfactory orientation of the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsadecemlineata. Entomol Exp Appl 24: 538-549. 35. Webster B, Bruce TJA, Dufour S (2008). Identification of volatile compounds used in host location by the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Journal of Chemical Ecology, 34, 1153-1161. 36. Wezel A, Casagrande M, Celette F, Vian JF, Ferrer A, and Peigné J (2009). Agroecological practices for sustainable agriculture. Agronomy for sustainable development, Volume 34, Issue 1, 1–20.

Witzgall, P., Ansebo, L., Yang, Z., Angeli, G., Sauphanor, B. & Bengtsson, M (2005). Plant volatiles affect oviposition by codling moths. Chemoecology 15: 77–83.

Downloads

Published

2019-06-20

Issue

Vol. 38 No. 1 (2019): Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences Zoology (Jan-Jun) 2019

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Behavioral Effect of Volatile Organic Compounds on Codling Moth Larvae Cydia Pomonella . (2019). Bulletin of Pure & Applied Sciences- Zoology , 38(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.48165/