Electronic Band Structure of Aluminium Nitride and Gallium Nitride Crystallizing in the Wurtzite and Zinc Blende Structures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Electronic band, Zinc blende, wurtzite, density of state, cation, nitride, optical transition, hydridizationAbstract
We have studied the electronic band structure of aluminium nitride and gallium nitride crystallizing in the wurtzite and zinc blende structures. We have presented theoretical study of atom and orbital projected partial density of state for the group third nitrides. We have compared the energy distribution of electronic states in valence and conduction bands as calculated by means of linear muffintin orbital method. The direct comparison with the appropriate density of state was presented to indicate the extent to which we got direct information about allowed electron states by considering the positions of the maxima and minima of the intensity in spectra. The influence of the core level width and spectrometer broadening was also considered. The good agreement between structures observed in spectra and structures in the calculated density of state allowed for consistent analysis of results. We have compared the amounts of bonding and antibonding states near the band edges for different choices of cations and crystal structures. Since the device applications are based mainly on wurtizite type nitride, particular attention was given to this phase. We examined for wultzite structure the level of anisotropy in the formed chemical bonds. Two kinds of bonds π and σ are connected directly with bond lengths. We examined the amount of electronic states available for optical transition as a function of crystal structure, crystallographic direction and presence of cation semicore states. The hydridization between d and p states for different cations and nitrogen were studied. We found that d-p interaction affected the valence band edge and influenced magnitude of the fundamental gap. The obtained results were compared with previously obtained results of theoretical and experimental work and were found in good agreement.
References
Christensen. N.E. and Gorzyca. I. (1994), Phys. Rev. B, 50, 4397.
Lambrecht. W.R.I., Segall. B, Rife. J., Hunter. W.R. and Wickenden. D.K., (1995), Phys. Rev. B, 51, 13516.
Yong-Nian xu and Ching. W.Y. (1993), Phys. Rev. B., 48, 4335.
Martin. G, Strite. S, Botchkarev. A, Agarwal. A, Rockett. A. and Morkoc. H., (1994), Appl. Phys. Lett. 65, 610.
Stagaresu. C.B., Duda. L.C., Smith. K.E., Guo. J.H., Nordgen. J., Singh.R. and Moustaka. T. D. (1996), Phys. Rev. B, 54, R17335.
Lawniczak-Jablonska. K., Suski. T, Liliental-webler. Z, Gullikson. E.M., Underwood. J. H., Perera. R.C.C. and Drummond. T. J. (1997), Appl. Phys. Lett. 70, 2711.
Duda. L.C., Stagarescu. C. B., Downes. J, Smith K., Korakakis. D, Moustakas. T.D., Guo. J. and Nordgren. J, (1998), Phys. Rev. B. 58, 1928.
Koike, Amano. H, and Akasaki. I., (1995), J. Appl. Phys. Part 2, 34, L1429. 9. Nakamura. S, Senoh. M., Nagahama. S., Iwasa. N., Yamada. T., Matsushita. T, Kiyoku. H, and Sugimoto. W, (1996), J. Appl. Phys. Part. 2, 35, L 74.
Gubanov. U.A., Lu. Z.W., Klein. B.M. and Fong. C.Y. (1996), Phys. Rev. B., 53, 4377. 11. Loiseau. A, Williaime, F., Demoncy. N., Hug. G and Pascard. H., (1996), Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 4737.
Jepsen. O. and Andersen. O.K., (1971), Solid state commun. 9, 1763.
Zhuo xu, Ding-Rong Zheng and Gang Su, (2011), Phys. Rev. B., 84, 245451. 14. Vainorius Neimantas, Daniel Jacbsson, Sebastian Lehmann, Anders Gustafsson, Kim Berly. A, Dick, (2014), Phys. Rev. B, 89. 165423.
Zhang. Ting, Rolf Heid, Kaluspeter Bohnen, Ping Sheng and Chan. C.T., (2014) Phys. Rev. B, 89, 205404.