An Ambiguity in the Relativistic Dynamics and Electromagnetism Regarding Force Transformation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Special relativity, Reference frames, Charge, Force, Electric field, Magnetic fieldAbstract
Einstein’s relativity has always been the subject of considerable controversy among physicists. So far, a few scientists have tried to demonstrate an inconsistency in the theory, whereas the majority of the academics believe that finding a real paradox via, e.g., designing a thought experiment is something absurd and impossible. Although many of the paradoxes introduced in the framework of relativity have truly been resolved using precise mathematical expressions, the paradox introduced in this article can be considered as an exception. A simple thought experiment is indeed carried out through which it is shown that the accepted transformation for the electromagnetic (EM) fields, as well as the same transformation for force, culminates in possible inconsistencies in the framework of the special theory of relativity. A tiny charge in a uniform electric field is set in motion over a charged lid located in a compartment shielded against electromagnetic fields within which there is a similar electric field. It is shown that the observer at rest with respect to the tiny charge claims that the lid is easily pushed downward as the charge passes over it, whereas the observer in the compartment’s rest frame claims otherwise.
References
R. Resnick, Introduction to Special Relativity, p. 124 (John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1968). 2. D. V. Redžić, D. M. Davidović, M. D. Redžić, “Derivations of relativistic force transformation equations” Journal of Electromagnetic Waves & Applications Vol. 25, 1150 (2011). 3. M. Javanshiry, “Is there any rational transformation for the relativistic force?” Annals of the “Dunarea de Jos” University of Galati. Fascicle II, Mathematics, Physics, Theoretical Mechanics Vol. 43 (2) (2020).
J. M. Supplee, “Relativistic buoyancy” American Journal of Physics Vol. 57, 75–77 (1989). 5. G. E. A. Matsas, “Relativistic Archimedes law for fast moving bodies and the general relativistic resolution of the “submarine paradox”” Physical Review D Vol. 68 (2) 027701 (2003).
R. S. Vieira, “Solution of Supplee’s submarine paradox through special and general relativity” Europhysics Letters Vol. 116 (5) 50007 (2016).