A Field Verification Based Statistical Approach toward Landslide Susceptibility Assessment

Authors

  • Parag Jyoti Dutta Department of Geology, Cotton University, Guwahati - 781001, India.
  • Jayanta J Laskar Department of Geological Sciences, Gauhati University, Guwahati - 781014, India
  • Santanu Sarma Department of Geology, Cotton University, Panbazar, Guwahati, Kamrup (M), Assam – 781001, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Landslide Susceptibility, Statistical Learning, Field-Observation, Bedrock, Regolith

Abstract

In recent time some detrimental effects of climate change has been observed in NE India: landslides and  scale of floods have been increasing annually, misty mornings during Christmas no longer occurs, wet bulb temperatures (TW) during summers have increased, and so on. However, the landslide  susceptibility literature begins with the premise that future hillslope failures are likely to occur under the  conditions of past and present instability. Moreover, most of the land surface parameters considered for  the landslide studies is not possible to make field identification (except slope, aspect, plan and profile  curvature). However, in the study area field the following observations are made - Earth slides occur only at sites where regolith thickness is between a range, neither too thick nor  too thin.  The dip angle of the gneissic bedrock surface has a more precise negative correlation with the  regolith thickness than the slope of the ground surface. Almost all profile curvatures are convex upward, but despite these, earth slides have occurred. There are a few convergent plan curvatures, but earth slides are not restricted only to these  sites.The reasons why these observations are contradictory to popular belief are under preparation as a full length article, but in short, the conclusion is that statistical learning combined with field observation for  applying some obvious mechanistic knowledge of the process is the key to successful landslide  susceptibility assessment. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Fisher, P. F., and Unwin, D. J., eds. Representing GIS. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons (2005).

. Blaschke T, Object-based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote sensing 65(2010): 2-16.

. Carlson, T.N.; Azofeifa, S.G.A. Satellite Remote Sensing of Land Use changes in and around San Jose´, Costa Rica. Remote Sensing of Environment, 70(1999): 247–256.

. Gao J Digital Analysis of Remotely Sensed Imagery. McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc, New York, USA (2009).

. Almutairi, A., Warner, T.A. Change Detection Accuracy And Image Properties: A Study Using Simulated Data. Remote Sensing 2(6), (2010):1508–1529 CrossRef, Google Scholar [6]. Guerschman J.P.; Paruelo, J.M.; Bela, C.D.; Giallorenzi, M.C.; Pacin, F. Land cover

classification in the Argentine Pampas using multi-temporal Landsat TM data. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 24, (2003) 3381–3402.

. Balakeristanan ML, Md Said MA Land Use Land Cover Change Detection Using Remote Sensing Application for Land Sustainability. American Institute of Physics 1482(2012): 425- 430.

. Lu, D., and Mausel, P. Change Detection Techniques. Remote Sensing 25(20), (2004): 2365– 2407 CrossRef, Google Scholar

. Singh A. Review Article Digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. International Journal of Remote Sensing 10: (1989): 989-1003.

. Smits, P.C., Dellepiane, S.G. and Schowengerdt, R.A., Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: A review and a proposal for a cost-based approach. International journal of remote sensing, 20 (8), (1999): 1461−1486.

. Butt A., Shabbir R., Ahmad S.S., Aziz N., Nawaz M., Shah M.T.A. Land cover classification and change detection analysis of Rawal watershed using remote sensing data J. Biol. Environ. Sci., 6 (1) (2015): 236-248.

. Michael L.Treglia An Introduction to GIS Using QGIS (v.2.12.2) (2017). https://mltconsecol.github.io/QGIS-Tutorial/QGIS- p.30 .

. Conrad, O., Bechtel, B., Bock, M., Dietrich, H., Fischer, E., Gerlitz, L., Wehberg, J., Wichmann, V., and Böhner, J. (2015): System for Automated Geoscientific Analyses (SAGA) v. 2.1.4, Geosci. Model Dev., 8, 1991-2007, doi:10.5194/gmd-8-1991-2015.

. Svidzinska, D. Methods of Geoecological Research: A Geoinformational Tutorial with the Open Source GIS SAGA. Kyiv, Logos, 402p. (in Ukrainian) (2014).

. Friedman, H. P., & Rubin, J. On some invariant criteria for grouping data. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 62, (1967):1158-1178.

. Radke, R.J. Image Change Detection Algorithms: A Systematic Survey. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14(3), (2005): 294–307. CrossRef, MathSciNet, Google Scholar

. Alphan H, Doygun H, Unlukaplan YI Classification comparison of land cover using multitemporal Landsat and ASTER imagery: the case of Kahramanmaraş, Turkey. Environ Monit Assess 151(2009): 327-336.

. Czapla-Myers, J.S. Anderson N.J., Biggar, S.F. Early ground-based vicarious calibration results for Landsat 8 OLI Proceedings of SPIE, (2013): 8866

. Markham B. L., Seiferth J. C., Smid J., Barker J. L., "Lifetime responsivity behavior of the Landsat-5 thematic mapper", Proc. SPIE, 3427, (1998): 420-431.

. Naresh, D. Rajesh, V and Madhu, T. Integrated flood risk mapping and landuse/ landcover at local scale by using GIS in dhulapally region, IJEP 38(12): 1056-1063 (2018).

. Naresh Kumar, D, Nune sandeep, S. Jyothi and Madhu, T. Significant changes on landuse/ land cover by using remote sensing and GIS analysis-review, IJESC, vol.7, Issue No.3, (2017),5433-5435

. Storey, James, Michael Choate, and Kenton Lee. "Landsat 8 Operational Land Imager On Orbit Geometric Calibration and Performance." Remote Sensing 6, no. 11 (2014): 11127-11152. [23]. Gao J., and Liu Y. Determination of land degradation causes in Tongyu County, Northeast China via land cover change detection Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf., 12 (1), (2010): pp. 9-16 [24]. Mas J.F., Monitoring land-cover changes A comparison of change detection techniques. International Journal of Remote Sensing 20: (1999): 139-152.

. Tucker M, Asik O Detecting Land Use Changes at the Urban Fringe from Remotely Sensed Images in Ankara, Turkey. Geocarto International 17: (2002): 47-52.

. Treitz P, and Rogan J Remote sensing for mapping and monitoring land cover and land-use change. Progress in Planning 61: (2004): 269-279.

Published

2019-09-12

How to Cite

Dutta, P.J., Laskar, J.J., & Sarma, S. (2019). A Field Verification Based Statistical Approach toward Landslide Susceptibility Assessment . Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences-Geology , 38(2), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.48165/