Soil Erosion Susceptibility Assessment for Prioritization of Hilly Areas of a Watershed in the Arunachal Himalayas in Northeast India Based on Weighted Sum Analysis Method on Morphometric Parameters

Authors

  • Madhurjyojit Chakravartty Associate Professor, Department of Geology, Cotton University, Guwahati – 781001, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Soil erosion assessment, Morphometric parameters, Weightedsum analysis, Prioritization

Abstract

In the present study, soil erosion susceptibility analysis has been carried out in the Dikrong watershed,  predominantly located in the Arunachal Himalayas, applying the Weighted Sum Analysis (WSA) technique  on some important morphometric parameters. Based on this approach, prioritization of the sub-watersheds  has been determined by assigning weightages, derived from the correlation matrix, to the respective  parameters and, accordingly, the sub-watersheds have been categorized into three priority levels viz., high,  moderate, and low to very low. It has been ascertained that sub-watersheds Niorch, Chimpu, and Pang are  high susceptible zones requiring urgent and efficient planning and management for better conservation.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

. Aher, P.D., Adinarayana, J., Gorantiwar, S.D., 2014. Quantification of morphometric characterization and prioritization for management planning in semi-arid tropics of India: A remote sensing and GIS approach. J. Hydro., 511:850-860.

. Bali, Y.P., and Karale, R.L., 1977. A sediment yield index for choosing priority basins. IAHS AISH Pubt., 222, .

. Dabral, P.P., Baithuri, N., Pandey, A., 2008. Soil Erosion Assessment in a Hilly Catchment of NorthEastern India Using USLE, GIS and Remote Sensing. Wat. Res. Mgmt.22: 1783-1798. [4]. Dhruvanarayana, V.V. and Ram Babu, 1983.Estimation of soil erosion in India.J. Irrig. Drain. Eng., 109: 419–434.

. Gregory, K.J and Walling, D.E. 1973. Drainage Basin Form and Process- a Geomorphological Approach. London: Edward Arnold.

. Horton, R.E. 1932.Drainage basin characteristics. Trans. Amer. Geophys. Union, 13: 350–361. [7]. Horton, R.E., 1933. The role of infiltration in the hydrological cycle. EOS, Transactions. American Geophysical Union, 14: 446–460.

. Horton, R.E. 1945. Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 56: 275-370. [9]. Jain, S.K., and Goel, M.K., 2002.Assessing the vulnerability to soil erosion of the Ukai Dam catchments using remote sensing and GIS, Hydr. Sc., 47: 31-40.

. Jain, S.K., Kumar, S., & Varghese, J. 2001.Estimation of soil erosion for a Himalayan watershed using GIS technique. Water Resource Management, 15: 41–54.

. Kale, V.S. and Gupta, A. 2001: Introduction to geomorphology. New Delhi: Academic (India) Publishers; Chapter 3.

. Meshram G.S. and Sharma S.K., 2015.Prioritization of watershed through morphometric parameters: a PCA-based approach. Appl. Water Sc.

. Miller, V.C. 1953. A quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristic in the clinch, Mountain area, Verdinia and Tennesser, Project NR 389-042,Tech. Rept.3 Columbia University, Department of Geology, ONR, Geography Branch, New York.

. Mosbahi, M., Benabdallah, S., and Boussema, M. R., 2013.Assessment of soil erosion riskusing SWAT model. Arab. J. Geosci.6: 4011-4019.

. Nearing, M.A., Foster, G.R., Lane, L.J., Finkner, S.C., 1989. A process-based soil erosion model for USDA-Water Erosion Prediction Project technology. Transactions of the American Society of Agricultural Engineers 32: 1587–1593.

. Rasool, S.N., Gaikwad, S.W., & Saptarshi, P.G. 2014. Soil erosion assessment in Sallar Wullarhama watershed in the Lidder catchment of Jammu and Kashmir using, USLE, GIS and remote sensing. International Journal of AdvancedEngineering Research and Studies, 3(2): 46–54.

. Ratnam, N.K., Srivastava, Y.K., Rao, V.V., Amminedu, E., Murthy, K.S.R., 2005. Check dam positioning by prioritization micro-watersheds using SYI model and morphometric analysis – remote sensing and GIS perspective. J. Ind. Soc. Rem. Sens. 33 (1): 25–38.

. Schumm, S.A. 1956.The evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol. Soc. Amer. Bull., 67: 597-646.

. Singh, O. and Singh, J. 2018.Soil erosion susceptibility assessment of the Lower Himachal Himalayan Watershed. Jour. Geol. Soc. India, 92 (2): 157-165.

. Smith, K.G., 1950. Standards for grading textures of erosional topography, Am. Jour. Sci, 248: 655-668.

. Strahler, A.N. 1964.Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. In: V.T. Chow (Ed.) Handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Co., New York, pp.4.39- 4.76.

. Suresh, M., Sudhakar, S., Tiwari, K.N. and Chowdary, V.M. 2004.Prioritization of Watersheds using Morphometric Parameters and Assessment of Surface Water Potential using Remote Sensing. Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing, 32 (3): 249-259.

. Wischmeier, W.H., Smith, D.D., 1965. Predicting rainfall-erosion losses from cropland east of the Rocky Mountains. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service Publication S-40. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.

Published

2019-08-15

How to Cite

Chakravartty , M. (2019). Soil Erosion Susceptibility Assessment for Prioritization of Hilly Areas of a Watershed in the Arunachal Himalayas in Northeast India Based on Weighted Sum Analysis Method on Morphometric Parameters . Bulletin of Pure and Applied Sciences-Geology , 38(2), 141–150. https://doi.org/10.48165/