LC-MS Analysis of Dimethyl Fumarate in Rat plasma with Measurement Uncertainty Estimation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Dimethyl fumarate, Rat plasma, Pharmacokinetics, LC-MS, Measurement of Uncertainty, Monomethyl fumarateAbstract
Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) is the methyl ester of fumaric acid initially recognized as a very effective hypoxic cell radio sensitizer. Phase III clinical trials found that DMF successfully reduced relapse rate and increased time to progression of disability in multiple sclerosis. Small molecules like dimethyl fumarate pose particular difficulties when analyzing biological samples due to the increased possibility of matrix effects and in this scenario DMF immediately converts to its active metabolite MMF (Monomethyl fumarate) by oral route. It is for this reason that a sensitive liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry method has now been developed for the analysis of DMF and for studying the pharmacokinetic profile in rats. Sample preparation was by rapid protein precipitation with acetonitrile. Analyte separation was achieved on a reversed-phase XTerra MS C18 column (100 x 3.9 mm, 3.5µ) with 0.01M ammonium formate and acetonitrile in gradient mode as the mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.0 mL/min and analyzed by a hybrid triple quadrupole linear ion trap mass spectrometer in positive electrospray ionization mode for both DMF and MMF. Limits of detection, and quantification were 20 and 50 ng/mL, for DMF and 1 and 10 ng/mL for MMF respectively. Calibration curve showed excellent linearity within the 50–2500 ng/mL range for DMF and 10–500 ng/mL range (r2 > 0.999) for MMF. Intra and inter-day precision defined by coefficient of variation was <10% and accuracy (bias %) was within 90–110%. Measurement uncertainty estimation was 8.6% for DMF and 11.6% for MMF. The method has been successfully used in the analysis of DMF and MMF in rat plasma following its administration to male wistar rats for pharmacokinetic studies.
Downloads
References
Held, K.D., Epp, E.R., Clark, E.P., Biaglow, J.E. 1988. Effect of Dimethyl Fumarate on the Radiation Sensitivity of Mammalian Cells in Vitro. Radiation Research. 115 (3): 495–502. 2. Kappos, L., Gold, R., Miller, D.H., Macmanus, D.G., et al. 2008. Efficacy and safety of oral fumarate in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase IIb study. Lancet. 372: 1463–1472.
Gold, R., Kappos, L., Arnold, D.L., Bar-Or, A., Giovannoni, G., Selmaj, K.et al. 2012. Placebo Controlled Phase 3 Study of Oral BG-12 for Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis. New England Journal of Medicine. 367 (12): 1098–1107.
Lamas, J.P., Sanchez‐Prado, L., Regueiro, J., Llompart, M., Garcia‐Jares, C. 2009. Determination of dimethyl fumarate and other potential allergens in desiccant and antimould sachets. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry. 394: 2231–2239.
Liu, S., Su, K. 1998. Determination of antimicrobial preservative dimethyl fumarate by high performance liquid chromatography. Se Pu. 16: 180–181.
HuiWen, H., FeiFei, H., JiaYin, Z., YaBin, H., JianJun, W. 2009. Determination of dimethyl fumarate in food by high performance liquid chromatography; Acta Agriculturae Shanghai. 25 (3): 72-74.
Narizzano, R., Risso, F., Venturelli, G., Devia, C., Carlini, E., Maggiolo, S. 2009. Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry analysis of dimethyl fumarate in consumer products. Journal of Chromatography A. 1216: 6762–6766.
Patrizia, S., Danilo, A.B., Silvana, G., Angela, S., Roberto, D. 2011. Determination of dimethyl fumarate (DMFu) in silica gel pouches using gas chromatography coupled ion trap mass spectrometry. Journal of Environmental Sciences and Health B. 46(4): 341-349.
Tsuyoshi, K., Kazuo, I., Atsuko, M., Tetsuji, N. 2011. Determination of Dimethyl fumarate and other fumaric and maleic acid diesters in desiccants and consumer products in Japan. Journal of Health Science. 57(3): 236-244.
Oriella, G., Domenico, M., Antonio, S., Stefania, A., Lucia, G. 2011. Determination of dimethyl fumarate in desiccant and antimould sachets by reversed‐phase liquid chromatography. Biomedical Chromatography. 25: 1315–1318.
Suneetha A., Raja K.R. 2016. Prescriptive Oriented Drug Analysis of Multiple Sclerosis Disease by LC-UV in Whole Human Blood. Journal of Chromatographic Science, 54(2): 165–174.12. Suneetha A., Raja K.R. 2016. Comparison of LC-UV and LC–MS methods for simultaneous determination of teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate and fampridine in human plasma: application to rat pharmacokinetic study. Biomedical Chromatography. 30: 1371–1377.
Bell, S. 1999. A beginner’s guide to uncertainty of measurement. In Measurement Good Practice Guide, No. 11, NPL.
Lee, S., Choi, H., Kim, E., Choi, H., Chung, H., Chung, K.H. 2010. Estimation of the measurement uncertainty by the bottom-up approach for the determination of methamphetamine and amphetamine in urine. Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 34: 222–228.
Adams T.M. 2002. In A2LA Guide for the Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty in Testing. American Association of Laboratory Accreditation Manual. July 1.
A2LA Type III Policy on Measurement Uncertainty. American Association of Laboratory Accreditation. August 1, 2002.