Comparative Evaluation of Animated Distraction Versus Virtual Reality During Local Anaesthetic Injection in Children

Authors

  • Avinash Sonune Assistant Professor, Department of Dentistry, Government Medical College, Washim, Maharashtra – 444505, India
  • Arwa Hussain Chaiwala Assistant Professor of Family and Community Medicine, Dental Director, SIU Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
  • Prachi Hazari Reader, Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Nanded Rural Dental College and Research Centre, Nanded, Maharashtra, India
  • Nidhi Adarshi Senior Lecturer, Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Awadh Dental College and Hospital, Jamshedpur, Jharkhand, India
  • Sai Sagar Senior House Surgeon, Govt Hospital Neyattinkara, Trivandrum, Kerala, India
  • Divyesh Shetty Assistant Professor, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Srinivas Institute of Dental Sciences, Mangalore, Karnataka, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/ajm.2026.9.01.37

Keywords:

Virtual reality, Animated distraction, Local anaesthetic injection

Abstract

Background: Pain and anxiety during local anaesthetic administration remain major  concerns in pediatric dental patients. Various distraction techniques have been introduced to  improve child cooperation and reduce fear during dental procedures. Animated distraction  and virtual reality are commonly used non-pharmacological behaviour management  techniques in Pediatric Dentistry. Aim: To comparatively evaluate the effectiveness of animated distraction and virtual reality  distraction during intraoral local anaesthetic injection in children. Materials and Methods: The present randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted on  30 children aged 5–10 years requiring local anaesthetic administration for dental treatment.  Participants were randomly divided into two groups of 15 each. Group I received animated  distraction using age-appropriate cartoons displayed on a mobile device, while Group II  received virtual reality distraction using a VR headset with child-friendly audiovisual content  during injection administration. Topical anaesthetic gel was applied prior to injection in  both groups. Pain perception was assessed using the Wong–Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale,  anxiety was evaluated using pulse rate and Facial Image Scale, and behaviour was assessed  using Frankl Behaviour Rating Scale. The obtained data were statistically analyzed using  independent t-test and Chi-square test with significance level set at p < 0.05. Results: Children in the virtual reality group demonstrated lower pain and anxiety scores  compared to the animated distraction group. Pulse rate increase during injection was also  lower in the virtual reality group. Improved behaviour ratings and better cooperation were  observed among children receiving virtual reality distraction. However, the difference  between the groups was statistically significant for pain perception and anxiety scores. Conclusion: Both animated distraction and virtual reality distraction were effective in  reducing pain and anxiety during local anaesthetic administration in children. However,  virtual reality distraction showed superior effectiveness and improved child cooperation  during dental procedures. 

 

References

Goyal S, Patel M, Bhatt R, Vaghela L, Vadher R, Choksi K. Comparative evaluation of different pain-alleviating methods on child’s dental anxiety and pain perception during local anesthesia administration: A clinical study. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2024;17(11):1265–1271.

Chandrasekharan J, Prabhu D, Sunayana M. Efficacy of painless injection technique-Vibraject-clinical trial in Chennai, India. International Journal of Medical and Dental Sciences. 2014;3(1):250–255.

Pielech M, Sawicki CM. Provider perspectives on pain management practices and needs in pediatric dentistry. Journal of the American Dental Association. 2023;154(12):1067–1076.

Kothari P, Mathur A, Chauhan RS, Nankar M, Tirupathi S, Suvarna A. Effectiveness of thaumaturgic distraction in alleviation of anxiety in 4–6-year-old children during inferior alveolar nerve block administration: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Dental Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. 2023;23(3):143–151.

Dahlan M, Alsaywed R, Alamoudi R, Batarfi AA, Basodan OY, Gazzaz Y, Alqarni YA, Alamoudi A. Assessment of different distraction behavioral methods in pediatric dental clinic: A systematic review. Cureus. 2023;15(7):e42366.

Bhowmick S, Bajana P, Patel KS, Sharma K, Varshini RA, Srija K, Surana P. Impact of tell-show-do and audio-visual distraction techniques on pediatric dental anxiety: A comparative study. Bioinformation. 2025;21(7):2221–2225.

Pisano M, Bramanti A, De Benedetto G, Martin Carreras-Presas C, Di Spirito F. The use of audiovisual distraction tools in the dental setting for pediatric subjects with special healthcare needs: A review and proposal of a multi-session model for behavioral management. Children. 2024;11(9):1077.

Bagattoni S, D’Alessandro G, Sadotti A, Alkhamis N, Piana G. Effects of audiovisual distraction in children with special healthcare needs during dental restorations: A randomized crossover clinical trial. International Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018;28(1):111–120.

Mahajan N, Kotwal B, Gupta A, Kaul B, Gupta RK, Kaul S. Comparative evaluation of an audiovisual distraction aid and print format entertainment on pain perception, anxiety and children behavior in the dental setting. International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry. 2022;15(1):54–59.

Sullivan C, Schneider PE, Musselman RJ, et al. The effect of virtual reality during dental treatment on child anxiety and behavior. ASDC Journal of Dentistry for Children. 2000;67(3):193–196, 160–161.

Arslan S, Erta E, Ülker M. The relationship between dental fear and sociodemographic variables. Erciyes Medical Journal. 2011;33(4):295–300.

Bankole O, Aderinokun GA, Denloye OO, et al. Maternal and child’s anxiety-effect on child’s behaviour at dental appointments and treatments. African Journal of Medicine and Medical Sciences. 2002;31(4):349–352.

Kaur R, Jindal R, Dua R, Mahajan S, Sethi K, Garg S. Comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of audio and audiovisual distraction aids in the management of anxious pediatric dental patients. Journal of Indian Society of Pedodontics and Preventive Dentistry. 2015;33(3):192–203.

Nuvvula S, Alahari S, Kamatham R, Challa RR. Effect of audiovisual distraction with 3D video glasses on dental anxiety of children experiencing administration of local analgesia: A randomised clinical trial. European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry. 2015;16(1):43–50.

Garrocho-Rangel A, Ibarra-Gutiérrez E, Rosales-Bérber M, Esquivel-Hernández R, Esparza-Villalpando V, Pozos-Guillén A. A video eyeglasses/earphones system as distracting method during dental treatment in children: A crossover randomised and controlled clinical trial. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018;19(1):74–79.

Garrocho-Rangel A, Ibarra-Gutiérrez E, Rosales-Bérber M, Esquivel-Hernández R, Esparza-Villalpando V, Pozos-Guillén A. A video eyeglasses/earphones system as distracting method during dental treatment in children: A crossover randomised and controlled clinical trial. European Journal of Paediatric Dentistry. 2018;19(1):74–79.

Wiederhold BK, Gao K, Sulea C, et al. Virtual reality as a distraction technique in chronic pain patients. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking. 2014;17(6):346–352.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-29

How to Cite

Comparative Evaluation of Animated Distraction Versus Virtual Reality During Local Anaesthetic Injection in Children . (2026). Academia Journal of Medicine, 9(1), 179-184. https://doi.org/10.48165/ajm.2026.9.01.37