An In-Vitro Study to Find the of Frequency ofMB2 Canal in Permanent Maxillary Molars

Authors

  • Sindhoori Harikumar Assistant Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Mallareddy Institute of Dental Science, Hyderabad, Telangana, India.
  • Lekha Nalluri BDS, General Dental Surgeon, Gulbarga, Karnataka, India.
  • Pujitha Yalavarthy BDS, General Dental Surgeon, Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh, India.
  • Ravali Jangala BDS, Private Practitioner, Khammam, Telangana, India.
  • Deep Solanki BDS, Ahmedabad Dental College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.
  • Abhay Kapoor MBBS, B.J. Medical College, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India.

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/4mf9nn42

Keywords:

Endodontic treatment, Maxillary Molar, MB2

Abstract

Present in-vitro research conducted to find out the  frequency of second mesiobuccal canals in permanent  maxillary molars. Eighty extracted, intact maxillary  permanent molars were selected for the present study.  Following that, a slow-speed diamond disc was used to  divide the occlusal sections of the crowns at the cement enamel junction. Using a safe-end diamond bur,  overhanging dentin that covered the canal orifices was  removed to allow straight line visibility. Under an x8  magnification, the teeth were photographed from their  occlusal side. Result showed that the first and second  maxillary molars, MB2 canals were found in 70% and 55%,  respectively. In conclusion it is crucial during endodontic procedures on maxillary molars to cautiously check pulpal  floor to detect any "extra" canals, notably the second  mesiobuccal canal, by scraping away the constrictive  dentin above the orifices. 

References

1. Cantatore G, Berutti E, Castellucci A. Missed anatomy: frequency and clinical impact. Endod Topics 2006;15:3-31.

2. Lee SJ, Lee EH, Park SH, Cho KM, Kim JW. A cone-beam computed tomography study of the prevalence and location of the second mesiobuccal root canal in maxillary molars. Restor Dent Endod. 2020;45(4):e46. Published 2020 Sep 3. doi:10.5395/rde.2020.45.e46

3. Gutmann JL. Problem Solving in Endodontics. 5th ed. St. Louis: Elsevier; 2011. pp. 85–6.

4. Paliwal A, Loomb K, Gaur KT, Jain A, Bains R, Vats A, et al. Dental operating microscope: An adjunct in locating the mesiolingual canal orifice in maxillary first molars. Asian J Oral Health Allied Sci. 2011;1:174–9.

5. Seidberg BH, Altman M, Guttuso J, Suson M. Frequency of two mesiobuccal root canals in maxillary permanent first molars. J Am Dent Assoc. 1973;87:852– 6.

6. Neaverth EJ, Kotler LM, Kaltenbach RF. Clinical investigation (in vivo) of endodontically treated maxillary first molars. J Endod. 1987;13:506–12. 7. Ingle JL, Bakland LK. 4th ed. Baltimore, MA: Williams and Wilkins; 1994. Endodontics; pp. 27–53.

8. Das S, Warhadpande MM, Redij SA, Jibhkate NG, Sabir H. Frequency of second mesiobuccal canal in permanent maxillary first molars using the operating microscope and selective dentin removal: A clinical study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2015 Jan-Mar;6(1):74-8.

9. Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: Clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod 1999;25:446-50.

10. Kulild JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod 1990;16:311-7. 11. Baratto Filho F, Zaitter S, Haragushiku GA, de Campos EA, Abuabara A, Correr

GM. Analysis of the internal anatomy of maxillary first molars by using different methods. J Endod. 2009;35:337–42.

12. Michetti J, Maret D, Mallet JP, Diemer F. Validation of cone beam computed tomography as a tool to explore root canal anatomy. J Endod. 2010;36:1187–90.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-23

How to Cite

An In-Vitro Study to Find the of Frequency ofMB2 Canal in Permanent Maxillary Molars. (2024). Academia Journal of Medicine, 7(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.48165/4mf9nn42