Immediate Loading of Single Implant in the Aesthetic Zone: A Case Report
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/d5m6hf69Keywords:
Immediate loading, prosthetic rehabilitation, primary stability, bone density, interim restorationAbstract
An implant-supported restoration in the anterior zone must produce the best possible aesthetic outcome. Providing rapid interim restorations after implant surgery has been suggested as a preferable course of therapy in the aesthetic zone. Following implant implantation, a well contoured interim restoration reduces alterations to the hard and soft tissues surrounding the implant. The aesthetic result and, thus, patient satisfaction may be improved as a result. To get the desired outcome, several prosthetic and surgical components must be properly designed and carried out. This case report describes the immediate loading of a single implant in the aesthetic zone.
References
1. Neale D, Chee WW: Development of implant soft tissue emergence profile: a technique. J Prosthet Dent. 1994, 71:364-8.
2. Jansen CE: Guided soft tissue healing in implant dentistry. J Calif Dent Assoc. 1995, 23:57-58. 60, 62 passim.
3. Su H, Gonzalez-Martin O, Weisgold A, Lee E: Considerations of implant abutment and crown contour: critical contour and subcritical contour. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010, 30:335-43.
4. F. G. Mangano, F. Luongo, G. Picciocchi, C. Mortellaro, K. B. Park, and C. Mangano, “Soft tissue stability around single implants inserted to replace maxillary lateral incisors: a 3D evaluation,” International Journal of Dentistry, 2016, Article ID 9393219
5. F. G. Mangano, P. Mastrangelo, F. Luongo, A. Blay, S. Tunchel, and C. Mangano, “Aesthetic outcome of immediately restored single implants placed in extraction sockets and healed sites of the anterior maxilla: a retrospective study on 103 patients with 3 years of follow-up,” Clinical Oral Implants Research, 2017, vol. 28, no. 3, pp. 272–282.
6. B. R. Chrcanovic, T. Albrektsson, and A. Wennerberg, “Immediate nonfunctional versus immediate functional loading and dental implant failure rates: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Journal of Dentistry, 2014, vol. 42, no. 9, pp. 1052–1059.
7. Berglundh, T., Lindhe, J., Ericsson, I., Marinello, C.P., Liljenberg, B. and Thomsen, P., The soft tissue barrier at implants and teeth. Clin Oral Implants Res 1991;2: 81–90
8. Chu SJ, Tarnow DP, Tan JH, Stappert CF. Papilla proportions in the maxillary anterior dentition, Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent 2009;29:385-393. 9. Tarnow D, Elian N, Fletcher P, et al. Vertical distance from the crest of bone to the height of the interproximal papilla between adjacent implants. J Periodontol 2003:74:1785-1788.
10. Priest G. Developing optimal tissue profiles implant-level provisional restorations. Dent Today 2005;24:96-100.
11. Stanley M, Braga FC, Jordao BM: Immediate Loading of Single Implants in the Anterior Maxilla: A 1-Year Prospective Clinical Study on 34 Patients. Int J Dent. 2017, 2017:8346496.
