Pain Scales in Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/ahr.2023.8.4.6Keywords:
Research, sensitivity, validity, intraclass correlationAbstract
In today’s era there are different types of scales to assess a particular disease condition. Also going through the process of research for the very first time might be quite cumbersome. The reliability and validity of the scale is an essential aspect in any research study. Also thorough knowledge and understanding of every scale is important for its productive application.
References
Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of digital visual analog scale pain scoring with a traditional paper-based visual analog scale in adults. Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews. 2018 Mar;2(3).
D. Gould et al. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Journal of Clinical Nursing 2001; 10:697-706
Hjermstad MJ, Fayers PM, Haugen DF, Caraceni A, Hanks GW, Loge JH, Fainsinger R, Aass N, Kaasa S, European Palliative Care Research Collaborative (EPCRC. Studies comparing numerical rating scales, verbal rating scales, and visual analogue scales for assessment of pain intensity in adults: a systematic literature review. Journal of pain and symptom management. 2011 Jun 1;41(6):1073-93.
Klimek L, Bergmann KC, Biedermann T, Bousquet J, Hellings P, Jung K, Merk H, Olze H, Schlenter W, Stock P, Ring J. Visual analogue scales (VAS): Measuring instruments for the documentation of symptoms and therapy monitoring in cases of allergic rhinitis in everyday health care. Allergo journal international. 2017 Feb;26(1):16-24.
Yeung AW, Wong NS. The historical roots of visual analog scale in psychology as revealed by reference publication year spectroscopy. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2019 Mar 12;13:86.
StreinerDL,Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York; Oxford University Press,1989
Scott J, Huskisson EC. Graphic representation of pain.Pain 1976;2:175-84
Scott J, Huskisson EC. Vertical or horizontal visual analogue scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1979;38:560
AunC,LamYM,CollectB.Evaluation of the use of visual analogue scale in Chinese patients.Pain 1986; 25:215-21
Stephenson NL, Herman J. Pain measurement: a comparison using horizontal and vertical visual analogue scales. Applied Nursing Research. 2000 Aug 1;13(3):157-8.
Weigl K, Forstner T. Design of paper-based visual analogue scale items. Educational and psychological measurement. 2021 Jun;81(3):595-611.
Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E, Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with
rheumatoid arthritis. The Journal of rheumatology. 1990 Aug 1;17(8):1022-4.
Gallagher EJ, Bijur PE, Latimer C, Silver W. Reliability and validity of a visual analog scale for acute abdominal pain in the ED. The American journal of emergency medicine. 2002 Jul 1;20(4):287-90.
Boonstra AM, Preuper HR, Reneman MF, Posthumus JB, Stewart RE. Reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale for disability in patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. International journal of rehabilitation research. 2008 Jun 1;31(2):165-9.
Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA. Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 1978;37:378–81
Childs JD,Piva SR, Fritz JM. Responsiveness of the numeric pain rating scale in patients with low back pain. Spine 2005;30:1331–4.
Jensen MP, McFarland CA. Increasing the reliability and validity of pain intensity measurement in chronic pain patients. Pain 1993;55: 195–203.
Rodriguez CS. Pain measurement in the elderly: a review. Pain ManagNurs 2001;2:38–46
Ferraz MB, Quaresma MR, Aquino LR, Atra E,
Tugwell P, Goldsmith CH. Reliability of pain scales in the assessment of literate and illiterate patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol 1990;17:1022–4
HAWKER GA. Measures of Adult Pain. Arthritis Care & Research 2011; 63,S240–S252
Williamson A. Pain: a review of three commonly used pain rating scales. ISSUES IN CLINICAL NURSING 2005; 14: 798–804
Roland MO, Morris RW. A study of the natural history of back pain. Part 1: Development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low back pain. Spine 1983; 8: 141-144
Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire and the Oswestry Disability Questionnaire. Spine 2000;25(24):3115-24
Davies CC, NitzAJ.Psychometric properties of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire compared to the Oswestry Disability Index: a systematic review. Physical Therapy Reviews, Volume 14, Number 6, December 2009 , pp. 399-408(10)
Macedo LG, Maher CG, Latimer J. Responsiveness of the 24-, 18- and 11-item versions of the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. Eur Spine J. 2011;20(3):458-63