In sılıco ANALYSIS OF NOVEL ANTICANCER AGENTS AS BRD4 INHIBITORS

Authors

  • Vindhya Vikram Singh Cheminformatics and Molecular Modelling Lab, Department of Chemistry, Shibli National College, Azamgarh – 276 001, Uttar Pradesh (India)
  • Shafqat Alauddin Cheminformatics and Molecular Modelling Lab, Department of Chemistry, Shibli National College, Azamgarh – 276 001, Uttar Pradesh (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Anticancer drugs, BET BRD4 proteins, molecular docking, protein inhibition, quinazolinone derivatives, targeted therapy

Abstract

The BET BRD4 proteins, involved in cancer, are of prime importance in  developing anticancer drugs. Cancer is marked by the uncontrolled growtof abnormal cells anywhere in the body with the potential to spread or  invade other body parts. The core nature of disease lies in defying normal  cell signals, be it anti-growth signals, death signals or apoptosis, and tissue  invasion metastasis. In present work, we have designed and tested novel  quinazolinone-based derivatives to establish them as a better anticancer  agent against the BRD4 target. The selection of BRD4 protein in this work  is based on earlier findings that reported the role of BRD4 in various  cancers such as lymphoma, multiple myeloma, acute myeloid leukemia,  acute lymphoblastic leukemia, chronic myeloid leukemia, solid tumours,  prostate cancer, nervous system tumour, colorectal cancer, and breast  cancer. Molecular docking was performed by using Glide docking module  of the Schrodinger suite. The XP Glide docking studies, ADME  (absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion) profile test, binding  energy calculations, and drug-likeness was performed to get the best BRD4  inhibitor ligand. Out of 16 quinazolinone derivates, ten ligands had better  XP Glide score, 4 were marginally less, and 2 gave poor score than the  standard drug LY2 (-6.779 kcal mol-1). The best ligand had a score of -9.866  kcal mol-1 which was 45% more efficient than LY2, so appears to be more  effective and potent anticancer inhibitor ligands for BRD4 protein. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ajani, O.O., Aderohunmu, D.V., Umeokoro, E.N. and Olomieja, A.O. 2016. Quinazoline pharma cophore in therapeutic medicine. Bangladesh Journal of Pharmacology, 11(3): 716-733. Allen, B.K., Mehta, S., Ember, S.W.J., Zhu, J.Y., Schönbrunn, E., Ayad, N.G. and Schürer, S.C. 2017. Identification of a novel class of BRD4 inhibitors by computational screening and binding simulations. American Chemical Society (ACS) Omega, 2(8): 4760-4771. Bray, F., Ferlay, J., Soerjomataram, I., Siegel, R.L., Torre, L.A. and Jemal, A. 2018. Global cancer statistics GLOBOCAN. CA (A Cancer Journal for Clinicians), 68(6): 394-424. Crisci, S., Amitrano, F., Saggese, M., Muto, T., Sarno, S., Mele, S., Vitale, P., Ronga, G., Berretta, M. and Di Francia, R. 2019. Overview of current targeted anti-cancer drugs for therapy in onco-hematology. Medicina (Lithuania), 55(8): 1-28.

Daina, A., Michielin, O. and Zoete, V. 2017. SwissADME: A free web tool to evaluate pharmacokinetics, drug-likeness and medicinal chemistry friendliness of small molecules. Scientific Reports, 7: 1-13.

Dhananjayan, K. 2015. Molecular docking study characterization of rare flavonoids at the Nac binding site of the first bromodomain of BRD4 ( BRD4 BD1). Journal of Cancer Research, 2015:1-15. [http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2015/762716].

Donati, B., Lorenzini, E. and Ciarrocchi, A. 2018. BRD4 and cancer: Going beyond transcriptional regulation. Molecular Cancer, 17(1):1-13..

Ferreira, L.G., Dos Santos, R.N., Oliva, G. and Andricopulo, A.D. 2015. Molecular docking and structure-based drug design strategies. Molecules, 20(7): 13384-13421.

Friesner, R.A., Murphy, R.B., Repasky, M.P., Frye, L.L., Greenwood, J.R., Halgren, T.A., Sanschagrin, P.C. and Mainz, D.T. 2006. Extra precision glide: Docking and scoring incorporating a model of hydrophobic enclosure for protein-ligand complexes. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry, 49(21): 6177-6196.

Gerber, D.E. 2008. Targeted therapies: A new generation of cancer treatments. American Family Physician, 77(3): 311-319.

Hanahan, D. and Weinberg, R.A. 2011. Review hallmarks of cancer : The next generation. Cell, 144(5): 646-674.

Jacobson, M.P., Pincus, D.L., Rapp, C.S., Day, T.J.F., Honig, B., Shaw, D.E. and Friesner, R.A. 2004. A hierarchical approach to all-atom protein loop prediction. Proteins: Structure, Function and Genetics, 55(2): 351-367.

In silico analysis of novel anticancer agents as BRD4 inhibitors 439

Jung, M., Philpott, M., Müller, S., Schulze, J., Badock, V., Eberspächer, U., Moosmayer, D., Bader, B., Schmees, N., Fernández-Montalván, A. and Haendler, B. 2014. Affinity map of bromodomain protein 4 (BRD4) interactions with the histone H4 tail and the small molecule inhibitor JQ1. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 289(13): 9304-9319.

Kavitha, K., Srinivasan, N. and Y, Haribabu. 2018. A review on quinazolinone and its derivatives with diverse biological activities. World Journal of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, 7(4): 628-649.

Madhavi Sastry, G., Adzhigirey, M., Day, T., Annabhimoju, R. and Sherman, W. 2013. Protein and ligand preparation: Parameters, protocols, and influence on virtual screening enrichments. Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design, 27(3): 221-234.

Muvva, C., Singam, E.R.A., Raman, S.S. and Subramanian, V. 2014. Structure-based virtual screening of novel, high-affinity BRD4 inhibitors. Molecular BioSystems, 10(9): 2384-2397. Nagaraju, G. 2015. Quinazoline: Unique and versatile pharmacophore in the filed of cancer. Indo American Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences, 2(4): 827-832.

Padma, V.V. 2015. An overview of targeted cancer therapy. Biomedicine, 5(4): 1-6. Pucci, C., Martinelli, C. and Ciofani, G. 2019. Innovative approaches for cancer treatment: Current perspectives and new challenges. Cancer Medical Science, 13: 1-26.

Saranath, D. and Khanna, A. 2014. Current status of cancer burden: Global and Indian scenario. Biomedical Research Journal, 1(1): 1. [https://doi.org/10.4103/2349-3666.240996]. Singh, L.R., Kumar, M. and Shaharyar, M. 2013. Pharmacological evaluation of quinazolinone derivatives: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical and Bioanalytical Science, 2(3): 35-38. Stathis, A., and Bertoni, F. 2018. BET proteins as targets for anticancer treatment. Cancer Discovery, 8(1): 24-36.

Subramaniam, R., Rao, G. and Pai, S.P.N. 2011. 2D QSAR studies of some novel quinazolinone derivatives as antitubercular agents. Journal of Computational Methods in Molecular Design, 1(3): 69-82.

Sung, H., Ferlay, J., Siegel, R.L., Laversanne, M., Soerjomataram, I., Jemal, A. and Bray, F. 2021. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 71(3): 209-249.

Tahir, A., Alharthy, R.D., Naseem, S., Mahmood, N., Ahmed, M., Shahzad, K., Akhtar, M.N., Hameed, A., Sadiq, I., Nawaz, H. and Muddassar, M. 2018. Investigations of structural requirements for BRD4 inhibitors through ligand- and structure-based 3d qsar approaches. Molecules, 23(7): 1-16.

Tiwary, B.K., Pradhan, K., Nanda, A.K. and Chakraborty, R. 2015. Implication of quinazoline 4(3H)-ones in medicinal chemistry : A brief review. Journal of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, 1(1): 1-7.

Wang, L., Xu, M., Kao, C.Y., Tsai, S.Y. and Tsai, M.J. 2020. Small molecule JQ1 promotes prostate cancer invasion via BET-independent inactivation of FOXA1. Journal of Clinical Investigation, 130(4): 1782-1792.

Weinstein, I.B. and Joe, A. 2008. Oncogene addiction. Cancer Research, 68(9): 3077-3080. White, M.E., Fenger, J.M. and Carson, W.E. 2019. Emerging roles of and therapeutic strategies targeting BRD4 in cancer. Cellular Immunology, 337: 48-53.

Xu, Y. and Vakoc, C.R. 2017. Targeting cancer cells with BET bromodomain inhibitors. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Medicine, 7(7): 1-17.

Zhou, P., Tian, F., Zou, J. and Shang, Z. 2010. Rediscovery of halogen bonds in protein-ligand complexes. Mini-Reviews in Medicinal Chemistry, 10(4): 309-314.

Published

2023-11-16

How to Cite

In sılıco ANALYSIS OF NOVEL ANTICANCER AGENTS AS BRD4 INHIBITORS. (2023). Applied Biological Research, 24(4), 429–439. https://doi.org/10.48165/