Effect Of Various Renal Biopsy Techniques On Clinico-Physiological  Observations In Dogs

G M Sheikh; J D Parrah; B A Moulvi; H Athar; M O Kalim; M A Baba

doi:10.48165/

Authors

G M Sheikh Division of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng 190 006 (J&K)
J D Parrah Division of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng 190 006 (J&K)
B A Moulvi Division of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng 190 006 (J&K)
H Athar Division of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng 190 006 (J&K)
M O Kalim Division of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng 190 006 (J&K)
M A Baba Division of Veterinary Surgery and Radiology, Faculty of Veterinary Sciences and Animal Husbandry, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology of Kashmir, Shuhama, Alusteng 190 006 (J&K)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Biopsy, clinico-physiological changes, dog, renal

Abstract

The present study was aimed at to observe the changes in various clinico-physiological parameters in dogs subjected to different renal biopsy techniques. Eighteen mongrel dogs, divided randomly into 3 groups, were subjected to ultrasound-guided biopsy using 14-G Tru cut biopsy needle (group I), ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy using 18-G spinal needle mounted on 10 ml syringe (group II) and laparoscope-guided biopsy using laparoscopic biopsy forceps(group III). Post biopsy analysis of various parameters like rectal temperature, heart rate, respiration rate and skin fold tenting test revealed non-significant difference (P>0.05) at any post-procedural interval. This indicated that all these renal biopsy techniques in dogs were safe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Drost, W.T., Henry, G.A., Meinkoth, J.H., Woods, J.P., Payton, M.E. and Rodebush, C. 2000. Effects of a unilateral ultrasound-guided renal biopsy on renal function in healthy sedated cats. Veterinary Radiology and Ultrasound, 41: 57-62.

Head, J.R. and Sulter, P.F. 1978. Approach to the patient with respiratory disease. In: Text Book of Veterinary Internal Medicine (ed. S. J. Ettinger), W.B. Saunders, Philadelphia, USA. Mayhew, P. 2009. Surgical views: Techniques for laparoscopic and laparoscopic-assisted biopsy of abdominal organs. Compendium: Continuing Education for Veterinarians, 31: 170-177. Patel, S.S., Parikh, P.V., Patil, D.B., Kelawala, N.H., Rajapurkar, M.M., Tank, P.H. and Patil, B.P. 2007. Comparative evaluation of ultrasound-guided renal biopsy using 14-G and 16-G Tru-cut biopsy needles in adult dogs. Indian Journal of Veterinary Surgery, 28: 125-127. Rezaie, A., Mousavi, G., Mohajeri, D. And Asadnasab, G. 2008. Complications of ultrasound-guided needle biopsy of the kidney in dogs. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances, 7: 1207-1213. Snedcor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G. 1982. Statistical Methods (8th edition). Iowa State University Press, IOWA, USA.

Vaden, S.L. 2004. Renal biopsy: Methods and interpretation. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Small Animal Practice, 34: 887-908.

Vaden, S.L. 2005. Renal biopsy of dogs and cats. Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice, 20: 11- 22.

Whittier, W.L. and Korbet, S.M. 2004. Renal biopsy: update: Diagnostics and techniques. Current Opinion in Nephrology and Hypertension, 13: 661-665.