Pollination Biology Of Ten Medicinally Important Angiosperms Of West Bengal (India)

Authors

  • Ashoke Bhattacharya Department of Botany, Krishnagar Government College, Krishnagar, Nadia - 741 101, West Bengal, India
  • Sudhendu Mandal Department of Botany, Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan - 731 235, West Bengal, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Anthesis, floral biology, insect behaviour, pollen viability, stigma receptivity

Abstract

The present paper gives flower morphology, anthesis, pollen production,  foraging nature of flower visitors, pollination mechanisms, in vitro and in vivo pollen germination and stigma receptivity of ten medicinal plants viz., Aegle  marmelos (L.) Correa (Rutaceae), Anthocephalus chinensis (Lamk.) A. Rich.  (Rubiaceae), Averrhoa carambola Linn. (Oxalidaceae), Cassia fistula Linn.  (Caesalpiniaceae), Catharanthus roseus (Linn.) G. Don. (Apocynaceae),  Dillenia indica Linn. (Dilleniaceae), Madhuca indica Gmelin. (Sapotaceae),  Pterospermum acerifolium Willd. (Sterculiaceae), Terminalia arjuna (Roxb. ex  DC.) Wt. & Arn. (Combretaceae) and Vitex negundo Linn. (Verbenaceae).  Species-wise variation on flower morphology, flower and pollen anthesis were  observed. Pollen production flower-1ranged from 4000 to 613150 and log  value for pollen production flower-1varied from 3.60 (in Vitex negundo) to  5.79 (in Aegle marmelos). Apertural types and exine ornamentation pattern of  pollen grains were noticed to be specie-specific. During day time different  members of Thysanoptera, Hymenoptera, Lepidoptera, Diptera and  Coleoptera visited the flowers and enhanced pollination success rate in terms  of fruit/seed set which was ascertained by netting and bagging process. In vitro pollen germination study indicated that the requirements of sucrose and  minerals like boron, calcium, magnesium and potassium for optimum  germination varied from species to species. Stigmas were more receptive  during first day after anthesis in A. marmelos, A. chinensis, M. indica, T. arjuna and V. negundo. However, A. carambola, C. roseus and D. indica showed more receptive stigmas during 2nd day after anthesis whereas stigma  were more receptive during 3rd day after anthesis in case of C. fistula and P.  acerifolium.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Atluri, J.B., Rao. S.P. and Subbareddi, C. 2000. Pollination ecology of Helicteres isora Linn. (Sterculiaceae). Current Science, 78: 713-718.

Balasubramanian, M.V. 1992. Integrated evolution of the angiosperm-butterfly complex. Indian Review on Life Science, 12: 109-117.

Bansal, S., Chauhan, S. and Chauhan, S.V.S. 1997. Studies on pollen fertility and in vivo pollen germination in some species of Cassia. Journal of Palynology, 33: 203-208.

Bhattacharya, A. and Mandal, S. 2000. Pollination biology in Bombax ceiba Linn. Current Science, 79: 1706-1712.

Brewbaker, J.L. and Kwack, B.H. 1963. The essential role of calcium ion in pollen germination and pollen tube growth. American Journal of Botany, 50: 859-865.

Castro, S., Silveira, B. and Navarro, L. 2008. Effect of pollination on floral longevity and costs of delaying fertilization in the out-crossing Polygala vayredae Costa (Polygalaceae). Annals of Botany, 102: 1043-1048.

Ciampolini, F., Faleri, C., Di Pietro, D. and Cresti, M. 1996. Structural and cytochemical characteristics of the stigma and style in vitis vinifera L. var. Sangiovese (Vitaceae). Annals of Botany, 78: 759- 764.

Erdtman, G. 1960. The acetolysis method – A revised description. Svensk Botanisk Tidskrift, 54: 261- 264.

Faegri, K. and vander Pijl, L. 1980. The Principles of Pollination Ecology. Pergamon Press Ltd., Oxford, UK.

Ish-Am, G. and Eisikowitch, D. 1993. The behaviour of honey bees (Apis mellitera) visiting avocado (Persea Americana) flowers and their contribution to its pollination. Apicultural Research, 32: 175-186.

Kaliamoorthy, S., Rangarajan, V. and Krishnamurthy, K.K. 1996. Influence of sucrose and salts on pollen germination in some members of Asteraceae. Journal of Indian Botanical Society, 75: 41- 44.

Lisci, M., Tanda, C. and Pacini, E. 1994. Pollination eco-physiology of Mercurialis annua L. (Euphorbiaceae), an anemophilous species flowering all year round, Annals of Botany, 74: 125- 135.

Mandal, S. and Chanda, S. 1981. Aero-allegens of West Bengal, in the context of environmental pollution and respiratory allergy. Biological Memoirs, 6: 1-61.

Mandal, S. and Ray, S.K. 1984. Pollen production in weeds associated with some rice cultivars in Burdwan district, West Bengal, India. Geophytology, 14: 74-81.

A. Bhattacharya and S. Mandal

Mandal, S. and Yonzone, R. 1987. Pollen production in Saxifraga cilliata. Environment and Ecology, 5: 386-387.

Mathur, G. and Mohan Ram, H.Y. 1986. Floral biology and pollination of Lantana camara. Phytomorphology, 36: 79-100.

McCartney, H.A. 1994. Dispersal of spores and pollen from crops. Grana, 33: 76-80. Mondal, A.K. and Mandal, S. 1998. Pollen production in some terrestrial angiosperms. Current Science, 74: 906-910.

Nepi, M. and Pacini, E. 1993. Pollination, pollen viability and pistil receptivity in Cucurbita pepo. Annals of Botany, 72: 527-536.

Pacini, E. 1992. Transport mechanism of pollen – A short review. pp. 69-79. In: Sexual Plant Reproduction (eds. M. Cresti and A. Tezzi), Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany. Shivanna, K.R. and Johri, B.M. 1989. The Angiosperm Pollen Structure and Function. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, India.

Shivanna, K.R. and Rangaswamy, N.S. 1993. Pollen Biology - A Laboratory Manual. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, India.

Singh, K.P., Bhavana and Dhakre, G. 2010. Reproductive biology of Evolvulus alsinoides L. (medicinal herb). International Journal of Botany, 6: 304-309.

Thien, L.B., Bernhardt, P., Devall, M.S., Chen, Z.D., Luo, Y.B., Fan, J.H., Yuan, L.C. and Williams, J.H. 2009. Pollination biology of basal angiosperms. American Journal of Botany, 96: 166-182.

Published

2012-03-21

How to Cite

Pollination Biology Of Ten Medicinally Important Angiosperms Of West Bengal (India) . (2012). Applied Biological Research, 14(1), 86–94. https://doi.org/10.48165/