Yield And Water Use Of Almond Under Drip Irrigation

Authors

  • Ishtiyaq A Khan Division of Fruit Science, S.K. University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir 191 121 (India)
  • M S Wani Division of Fruit Science, S.K. University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir 191 121 (India)
  • Imtiyaz A Wani Division of Fruit Science, S.K. University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir 191 121 (India)
  • M A Mir Division of Fruit Science, S.K. University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir 191 121 (India)
  • Nawsheeba Wani Division of Fruit Science, S.K. University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir 191 121 (India)
  • Imtiyaz A Malik Division of Fruit Science, S.K. University of Agricultural Science and Technology of Kashmir, Shalimar, Srinagar, Jammu & Kashmir 191 121 (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Almond, evapotranspiration, micro-irrigation, Prunus dulcis, water requirement, yield

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Central Institute of Temperate  Horticulture, Srinagar, Kashmir on almond (Prunus dulcis Mill.) cv.  ‘Shalimar’ plantation to standardize the water requirement for yield  optimization in almond. The study revealed that vegetatively propagated  almond plants positively responded to irrigation. The irrigation, applied  according to different ETc levels, improved yield and yield contributing  attributes of almond significantly. Highest nut yield (2.42 kg tree-1) was  recorded at 100% ETc during 1st year of experimentation which increased  to 2.91 kg tree-1in the subsequent year. Similarly, highest shelling  percentage (53%) was recorded in nuts receiving full irrigation during the 2nd year of experimentation. The highest yield and yield contributing  attributes of almond, recorded at 100% ETc level of irrigation, were  statistically at par with measured parameters recorded at 75% ETc level of  irrigation.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allen, R.G., Pereira, L.S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1999. Crop Evapotranspiration - Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56, United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.

Bryla, D.R., Trout, T.J. and Ayars, J.E. 2003. Growth and production of young peach trees irrigated by furrow, microjet, surface drip or subsurface drip systems. Hort Science, 38: 1112-1116. Girona, J., Marsal, J., Cohen, M., Mata, M. and Miravete, C. 1993. Physiological and yield response of almond (Prunus dulcis L.) to different irrigation regimes. Acta Horticulturae, 335: 389-398. Girona, J., Mata, M. and Marsal, J. 2005. Regulated deficit irrigation during the kernel filling period and optimal irrigation rates in almond. Agricultural Water Management, 75: 152-167. Goldhamer, D.A. 1995. Water management of almond trees. pp. 171-178. In: Almond Orchard Management (ed. Micke). University of California, California, USA.

Goldhamer, D.A. and Fereres, E. 2004. Irrigation scheduling of almond trees with trunk diameter sensors. Irrigation Science, 23: 11-19.

Goldhamer, D.A. and Smith, T.E. 1995. Single season drought irrigation strategies influence almond production. California Agriculture, 49: 19-22.

Gomez, K.A. and Gomez, A.A. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research (2nd edn.), John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.

Hutmacher, R.B., Nightingale, H.I., Rolston, D.E., Biggar, J.W., Dale, F., Vail, S.S. and Peters, D. 1994. Growth and yield responses of almond (Prunus amygdalus) to trickle irrigation. Irrigation

Ishtiyaq A. Khan et al.

Science, 14: 117-126.

Mousavi, A. and Alimohamadi, R. 2006. Effects of deficit irrigation and drought during different phenological stages of fruit growth and development in almond production. Acta Hortculturae, 726: 489-494.

Naor, A., Peres, M., Greenblat, Y., Gal, Y. and Ben Arie, R. 2004. Effects of pre-harvest irrigation regime and crop level on yield, fruit size distribution and fruit quality of field grown ‘Black Amber’ Japanese plum. Journal of Horticultural Sciences and Biotechnology, 79: 281-288.

Prichard, T.L. 2003. Irrigation Management for Almond Trees under Drought Conditions. Comprehensive Project Report, 2000-2001, Department of Land, Air and Water Resoruces, UC Davis, USA pp 1-3.

Romero, P., Botia, P. and Garcia, F. 2004. Effects of regualted deficit irrigation under subsurface drip irrigation conditions. Plant and Soil, 260: 169-181.

Snyder, R.L. and Pruitt, W.O. 1989. Crop coefficients. pp. 30-32. In: Irrigation Scheduling: A Guide for Efficient On-farm Water Management (Eds. D.A. Goldhamer and R.L. Snyder). Publication No. 21454. Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of California, California, USA.

Torrecillas, A., Ruiz-Sanchez, M.C., Leona, A. and Delamor, F. 1989. The response of young almond trees to different drip irrigated conditions. Journal of Horticultural Science, 64: 1-7. Valverde, M., Madrid, R. and Garcia, A.L. 2006. Effect of the irrigation regime, type of fertilization and culture year on the physical properties of almond cv. Guara. Journal of Food Engineering, 76: 584-493.

Downloads

Published

2012-06-03

Issue

Vol. 14 No. 2 (2012): Applied Biological Research (Jul) 2012

Section

Review Articles

How to Cite

Yield And Water Use Of Almond Under Drip Irrigation . (2012). Applied Biological Research, 14(2), 120–124. https://doi.org/10.48165/
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC