Evaluation Of Some Scab Resistant Apple Hybrids As Early Season Genotypes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Apple hybrids, flower phenology, fruit characteristics, scab resistantAbstract
Five scab-resistant hybrids [ASPE-99 (Sunhari x Prima), ASPE-36 (Lal Ambri x Prima), ALPE-99 (Sunhari x Prima), ASPE-22 (Sunhari x Prima) and ALPE-57 (Lal Ambri x Prima)] developed by SKUAST Kashmir, were evaluated for phenological, pomological and storage characteristics in 2009 and 2010. The days taken to full bloom ranged between 80.5 to 86.5 in hybrids and 76.5 to 83.0 in check cultivars. ASPE-36 and ASPE-99 matured earlier (82 days for fruit development) while ALPE-57, ASPE-22 and ALPE-99 matured 6.0-16.5 days later. Fruit shape in hybrids was oblate and slight to moderately lopsided with smooth surface. Fruits were crisp, juicy, moderately flavoured and red coloured with yellowish background and creamy flesh. Fruit firmness was maximum in ALPE-57 followed by ALPE-99 and ASPE-36. Hybrids significantly varied in fruit size and weight with high values in ALPE 99, ALPE-57 and ASPE-22. Hybrids had higher TSS and total sugars and were less acidic than checks. Total sugar was maximum and titrable acidity minimum in ASPE-22. The storage life of hybrids was higher than control with maximum storage life of 156-172 days under CA storage, 73-88 days under refrigeration and 34-45 days under normal storage conditions. Hybrids ASPE-99, ASPE-22 and ALPE-57 were identified as prospective genotypes for release as improved early season scab-resistant cultivars.
Downloads
References
Abbott, J.A. 1999. Quality measurement of fruits and vegetables. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 15: 207-225.
Anonymous. 2011a. Indian Horticulture Database. Ministry of Agriculture, Government of India, New Delhi, India. (www.nhb.gov.in).
Anonymous. 2011b. Annual Progress Report 2010-2011. Department of Horticulture, Government of Jammu and Kashmir, Srinagar, J&K, India.
Argenta, L., Fan, X. and Mattheis, J. 2000. Delaying establishment of controlled atmosphere or CO2 exposure reduces ‘Fuji’ apple CO2 injury without excessive fruit quality loss. Postharvest Biological Technology, 20: 221-229.
Asma, B.M., Kan, T. and Birhanli, O. 2007. Characterization of promising apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) genetic resources in Malatya, Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 54: 205-212.
Banday, F.A. and Sharma, M.K. 2010. Present status of temperate fruits in Jammu and Kashmir: Problems and strategies. pp 3-17. In: Advances in Temperate Fruit Production (eds. F.A. Banday and M.K. Sharma), Kalyani Publishers, New Delhi, India.
Campeanu, G., Neata, G. and Darjanschi, G. 2009. Chemical composition of the fruits of several apple cultivars growth as biological crop. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj Napoca, 37: 161-164.
Czynczyk, A., Bielicki, P., Mika, A. and Krawiec, A. 2011. A nine-year evaluation of several scab resistant apple cultivars for organic fruit production. Journal of Fruit and Ornamental Plant Research, 19: 87-97.
Guleryuz, M. 1995. Selection of the quality-fruited wild apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) forms resistant to late spring frosts on Erzincan Plain. Acta Horticulturae, 384: 189-194. Harsan, E., Sestras, R., Somsai, P., Barbos, A. and Sestras, A. 2006. Research regarding the principal chemical component loss in the apple fruit during storage. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca, 34: 106-114.
Hirst, P., Michael, N. D., and Rosie Lerner, B. 2006. Home Storage of Apples. Purdue University Cooperative Extension Service, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2053 USA (http://www.hort. purdue.edu/ext/HO-95.pdf)
K.D. Farooqui et al.
Karlsen, A.M., Aaby, K., Sivertsen, H., Baardseth, P. and Ellekj, R.M.R. 1999. Instrumental and sensory analysis of Norwegian and imported apples. Food Quality and Preferences, 10: 305- 314.
Kondo, S., Setha, S., Rudel, D.R., Buchanan, D.A. and Mattheis, J.P. 2005. Aroma volatile biosynthesis in apples affected by 1-MCP and methyl jasmonate. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 36: 61-68.
Maarse, H. 1991. Volatile Compounds in Foods and Beverages. Marcel Dekker, New York, USA. Mitre, I., Mitre, V., Ardelean, M., Sestras, R. and Sestras, A. 2009. Evaluation of old apple cultivars grown in central Transylvania, Romania. Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj Napoca, 37: 235-237.
Ranganna, S. 2001. Handbook of Analysis and Control for Fruit and Vegetable Products. Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi, India.
Richard, P.M. 1995. Apple Variety Evaluations. Technical Bulletin, Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Tech., and Virginia State University, Virginia, USA.
Sestras, A., Sestras, R., Lazar, V., Mitre, V., Mitre, I., Ropan, G. and Barbos, A. 2009. The influence of fruit position in the crown of trees on the sugar content and morphological traits of apple fruits. Horticulture, 66: 170-176.
Watkins, R. and Smith, R.A. 1982. Descriptor List for Apple (Malus). Secretariat for International Board for Plant Genetic Resources, Rome, Italy.
Yankun, P. and Renfu, L. 2006. Improving apple fruit firmness predictions by effective correction of multispectral scattering images. Postharvest Biology and Technology, 41: 266-274. Yao, S., Walser, R. and Martin, C. 2012. Evaluation of Eight Apple Cultivars and Two Training Systems in Northern New Mexico. Bulletin 803. New Mexico State University, Agricultural Experiment Station, College of Agricultural, Consumer and Environmental Sciences, Mexico. Zude, M., Herold, B., Roger, J.M., Bellon-Maurel, V. and Landahl, S. 2006. Non-destructive tests on the prediction of apple fruit flesh firmness and soluble solids on tree and in shelf life. Journal of Food Engineering, 77: 254-260.