Comparative Performance Of Six Aromatic Rice (Oryza Sativa) Varieties Under Conventional And Sri Method Of Cultivation

Authors

  • M K Mandal Department of Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia - 741 264, West Bengal (India)
  • M Pramanick Department of Agronomy, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Mohanpur, Nadia - 741 264, West Bengal (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Aromatic rice, SRI, organic cultivation, quality, yield

Abstract

A field experiment was carried out at BCKVV, West Bengal (India) during  kharif 2011 and 2012 to assess the performance of 6 rice varieties under  conventional and SRI methods of cultivation with respect to growth, yield  and quality parameters. The results revealed that the method of crop  production significantly affected plant height and root length, whereas  varieties exerted significant impact on dry matter accumulation, LAI, root  length and root dry weight. The SRI method produced 58.6 and 21.8%  higher grain and straw yields, respectively, than conventional system. The  rice quality was unaffected by change in cultivation method. Rice variety  ‘Dehrdun’ gave better response with respect to kernel length and L:B ratio  than other varieties under SRI method.. The physico-chemical properties  of soil after harvest was appreciable improved. Among the different  varieties ‘Badsha bhog’ gave higher gross return, net return and B: C ratio  under SRI method.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anonymous. 2009. Recommendation Approved by 5th Combined Agresco Meeting, Vol. I, SDAU, Sardarkrushinagar, India, pp. 22-27.

Barison, J. 2002. Evaluation of nutrient uptake and nutrient-use efficiency of SRI and conventional rice cultivation methods in Madagascar. pp. 143-147. In: Proceeding of International Conference. Sanya, China, 1–4 April 2002, CIIFAD, Ithaca, NY, USA, pp. 143–147.

Barrett, C.B., Moser, C.M., Mchugh, O. and Bavison, J. 2004. Better technology, better plots or better farmers and quest: Identifying changes in productivity and risk among Malagasy rice farmers. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 84: 869-888.

Basvaraja, H., Mahalanashetti, S.B and Sivanagaraju, P. 2008. Technological change in paddy production: A comparative analysis of traditional and SRI method of cultivation. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 63: 629-640.

Berkelar, D. 2001. SRI, the system of rice intensification: Less can be more. In: ECHO Development Notes (EDN), Issue 70 (Eds. Martin Price and Dawn Berkelaar), ECHO, USA. Cochran, W.G. and Cox, G.M. 1963. Experimental Designs. Asia Publishing House, Bombay, India.

Donald, C.M. and Humblin, J. 1976. The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Advances in Agronomy, 28: 361-405.

Harshavardhan, M., Kumar, D.P., Raviprasad Sajjan, M., Rajesh, A.M. and Yathindra, H.A. 2014. Influence of INM on flower quality, yield and vase life of carnation (Dianthus caryophyllus L.) under polyhouse. Green Farming, 5: 435-438.

Jackson M. L. 1973. Soil chemical analysis. Prentice Hall of India Pvt. Ltd; New Delhi. Meena, H.N. and Shivay, Y.S. 2010. Productivity of short-duration summer forage crops and their effect on succeeding aromatic rice in conjunction with gypsum-enriched urea. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 55: 11-15.

Milka, S.A., Tejinder, S.K and John, W.D. 2000. Mineralization and denitrification in upland nearly saturated and flood subtropical soil: Effect of nitrate and ammonical nitrogen. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 31: 162-167.

Performance of methods and varieties of rice 61

Quyen, N.V. and Sharma, S.N. 2003. Relative effect of organic and conventional farming on growth, yield and grain quality of scented rice and soil fertility. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 49: 623-629.

Randriamiharisoa, R and Uphoff, N. 2002. Factorial trials evaluating the separate and combined effects of SRI practices. pp. 40-46. In: Proceedings of an International Conference on Assessments of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI), Sanya, China, 1–4 April 2002, CIIFAD, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Randriamiharisoa, R. 2002. Research results on biological nitrogen fixation with the system of rice intensification. pp. 148-157. In: Proceedings of an International Conference on Assessments of the System of Rice Intensification (SRI), Sanya, China, 1–4 April 2002, CIIFAD, Ithaca, NY, USA.

Rao, Y., Singh, R.M. and Patra, A.K. 2005, System of rice intensification as a method of stand establishment in rice. American Eurasian Journal of Agricultural and Environment Sciences, 5: 189-195.

Reddy, V.R., Reddy, P., Srinivasa-Reddy, M. and SreeRama, R.D. 2005. Water use efficiency: A study of system of rice intensification (SRI) adoption in Andhra Pradesh. Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 60: 458-472.

Roy, M. 2013. Effect of Different Organic Nutrient Management and System of Cropping on Indigenous Rice. M.Sc. thesis, Bidhan Chandra Krishi Viswavidyalaya, Kalyani, West Bengal, India.

Sarath, P.N. and Thilak, B. 2004. Comparison of productivity of system of rice intensification and conventional rice farming systems in the dry-zone region of Sri Lanka. In: Proceeding of 4th International Crop Science Congress, 26 September, October, 2004, Asian Crop Science Society, Australian Society of Agronomy, Brisbane, Australia.

Shrirame, M.D., Rajgire, H.J. and Rajgire, A.H. 2000. Effect of spacing and seedling number per hill on growth attributes and yield of rice hybrids under lowland condition. Journal Soil and Crops, 10: 109-113.

Shukla, L. and Tyagi, S.P. 2009. Effect of integrated application of organic manures on soil parameters and growth of mungbean (Vigna radiata). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 79: 174-177.

Singh, A.L. and Singh, P.K. 1987. Comparative study on Azolla and blue green algae dual culture with rice. Israel Journal of Botany, 36: 53-61.

Singh, Y.V. Singh, K.K. and Sharma, S.K. 2013. Influence of crop nutrition on grain yield, seed quality and water productivity under two rice cultivation systems. Rice Science, 20: 129-138. Thakur, A.K., Rath, S., Roychowdhury, S and Uphoff, N. 2010. Comparative performance of rice with system of rice intensification (SRI) and conventional management using different plant spacing. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 196: 146-159.

Uphoff, N. and Randriamiharisoa, R. 2002. Reducing water use in irrigated rice production with the Madagascar system of rice intensification (SRI). pp 71-87. In: Water-wise Rice Production, IRRI, New Delhi, India.

Watson, D. J. 1947. Comparative physiological studies on the growth of field crops. I. Variation in net assimilation rates and leaf area between species and varieties, and within and between years. Annals of Botany, 11: 41-76.

Published

2015-03-15

How to Cite

Comparative Performance Of Six Aromatic Rice (Oryza Sativa) Varieties Under Conventional And Sri Method Of Cultivation . (2015). Applied Biological Research, 17(1), 55–61. https://doi.org/10.48165/