Deciphering Protein Structure Identified In Cumin (Cuminum Cyminum L.)

Authors

  • Sharda Choudhary National Research Centre on Seed Spices, Tabiji, Ajmer - 305 206, Rajasthan (India)
  • Geetika Jethra National Research Centre on Seed Spices, Tabiji, Ajmer - 305 206, Rajasthan (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Cumin, isoelectric point, protein, Ramachandran plot, secondary structure

Abstract

Cumin (Cuminum cyminum Linn.), an important commercial seed spice  with medicinal properties, belongs to family Umbelliferae. The present  study was aimed to elucidate the high quality 3D structure and function  of cumin protein (gn50). For the prediction of secondary structure of  proteinFASTAsequenceswere used and prediction was performed using  GOR IV, SOPMA, ProFunc and PDBSum. The instability index 24.29,  isoelectric point (pI) 5.14 and Grand average hydropathicity (GRAVY)  0.751 determined from primary and secondary structural analysis  illustrated the stability of cumin protein. Stability of 3D structure of  protein was confirmed using Ramachandran plot having 80.1% residues  or empirically distributed data-points present in the structure lie in most  favoured region with the total score of 98.3%. The models were  validated using protein structure checking server SAVES. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anon, A. 1993. Application of gas-liquid chromatography to the analysis of essential oils, Part XVI: Monographs for five essential oils. A report of Analytical Methods Committee. Analyst, 118: 1089-1098.

Choudhary, S. and Jethra, G. 2014. In-silico scrutiny of cumin (Cuminum cyminum) protein structure – GQ33, Research on Crops, 15: 705-709.

Choudhary, S., Meena, R.S., Jethra, G., Sharma, R.S. and Panwar, A. 2015. Optimized methodology for high quality DNA isolation from leaves and seeds of fennel (Foeniculum vulgare). Journal of Plant Developmental Science, 72: 173-175.

Fischer, D. 2006. Servers for protein structure prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 16: 178-182.

Gill, S.C. and Von Hippel, P.H. 1989. Extinction coefficient. Analytical Biochemistry, 182: 319- 328.

Guermeur, Y., Geourjon, C., Gallinari, P. and Deleage, G. 1999. Improved performance in protein secondary structure prediction by inhomogeneous score combination. Bioinformatics, 15: 413-421.

Guruprasad, K., Reddy, B.V.P. and Pandit, M.W. 1990. Correlation between stability of a protein and its dipeptide composition: A novel approach for predicting in vivo stability of a protein from its primary sequence. Protein Engineering, 4: 155-164.

Sharda Choudhary and Geetika Jethra

Hemavathy, J. and Prabhakar, J.V. 1988. Lipid composition of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) seeds. Journal of Food Science, 53: 1578-1579.

Ikai, A.J. 1980. Thermo stability and aliphatic index of globular proteins. Journal of Biochemistry, 88: 1895-1898.

Jethra, G., Choudhary, S., Singh, P., Adwany, S. and Panwar, A. 2015. In silico approach to decode sequential language for structural scrutiny of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L.) protein. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 85: 434-436.

Jethra, G., Mishra, A.K., Pandey, P.S. and Chandrasekharan, H. 2012. Structure and function prediction of unknown wheat protein using LOMENTS and I-TASSER. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 82: 867-874.

Jethra, G., Mishra, A.K., Pandey, P. S., Choudhary, S. and Chandrasekharan, H. 2014. Phylogenetic and structural scrutiny of matK gene from wheat representing Poaceae family for DNA barcoding. International Journal of Science and Nature, 5: 141-146.

Kyte, J. and Doolottle, R.F. 1982. A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein. Journal of Molecular Biology, 157: 105-132.

Mihasan, M. 2010. Basic protein structure prediction for the biologist: A review. Archives of Biological Science Belgrade, 62: 857-871.

Rong, L.I and Jiang, ZI-Tao. 2004. Chemical composition of the essential oil of Cuminum cyminum L. from China. Flavor and Fragrance Journal, 19: 311-313.

Shaath, N.A. and Azzo, N.R. 1993. Essential oil of Egypt. pp. 591-603. In: Food Flavor Ingredients and Composition (ed. G. Charalambous). Elsevier, Amsterdam, the Netherland. Sowbhagya, H.B. 2013. Chemistry, technology and nutraceutical functions of cumin (Cuminum cyminum L): An overview. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 53: 1-10. Thamaraikannan, M. and Sengottuvel, C. 2012. Cumin: Can India maintain a monopoly? pp. 11-14. In: Market Survey: Facts For You, A Magazine for Business and Economy, May, 2012, Okhla, New Delhi

Wallner, B. and Elofsson, A. 2005. All are not equal: A benchmark of different homology modeling programs. Protein Science, 14: 1315-1327.

Weiss, E.A. 2002. Umbelliferae. pp. 261-268.In: Spice Crops. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. Zhang, X.D., Roy, A. and Zhang, Y. 2011. Automated protein structure modeling in CASP9 by I TASSER pipeline combined with QUARK-based ab initio folding and FG-MD-based structure refinement. Proteins, 79(10): 147-160.

Zhang, Y. 2008a. I-Tasser server for protein 3D structure prediction, BMC Bioinformatics, 9: 40. Zhang, Y. 2008b. Progress and challenges in protein structure prediction. Current Opinion in Structural Biology, 18: 342-348.

Zidani, S., Ferchichi, A. and Chaieb M. 2005. Genomic DNA extraction method from pearl millet (Pennisetum glaucum) leaves. African Journal of Biotechnology, 4: 862-866.

Published

2015-09-10

How to Cite

Deciphering Protein Structure Identified In Cumin (Cuminum Cyminum L.) . (2015). Applied Biological Research, 17(3), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.48165/