Effect Of Feed Additives On In Vitro Fermentation Kinetics And Substrate Utilization With And Without Buffer

Authors

  • E Lokesha Dairy Production Section, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, SRS, Bangalore – 560 030, Karnataka (India)
  • R Dhinesh Kumar Dairy Production Section, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, SRS, Bangalore – 560 030, Karnataka (India)
  • Bandla Srinivas Dairy Production Section, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, SRS, Bangalore – 560 030, Karnataka (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Buffer, enzyme, glycerol, PABA, probiotics, propylene glycol, fermentation kinetics

Abstract

The study was aimed to evaluate the effect of various categories of feed  additives on rumen fermentation. Fermentation kinetics and substrate  utilization by rumen microbes was studied by fortifying the substrate  having roughage to concentrate of 60:40 with glucogenic viz., glycerol and  propylene glycol (PG), rumen fermentation modifiers viz., para  aminobenzoic acid (PABA), exogenous fibrolytic enzymes (EFE) and  probiotic feed additives by applying first order kinetics model to in vitro gas production (IVGP) technique. Glycerol was more effective than PG for  substrate fermentation kinetics and its utilization, particularly IVTVFA  production. Buffer addition was more effective with PG but not with  glycerol. PABA had non-significant impact on either substrate  fermentation kinetics or utilization. EFE fortification significantly  improved the extent of fermentation, IVNDFD and IVTVFA; however,  probiotics showed only significant increase in IVDMD (P<0.01) and IVTVFA (P<0.05) by 11%. Study concluded that PG and glycerol being  glucogenic compounds improved the extent of fermentation and TVFA  production but glycerol was more effective than PG. Probiotics  supplementation also had positive effect on IVTVFA production. EFE  fortification improved fibre digestion. Buffer addition along with feed  additives may enhance substrate kinetic efficiency of fermentation but it  was selective.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis (18th edn.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Washington, USA.

Arikoa, T., Kass, M., Henno, M., Fievezc, V., Kart, O., Kaart, T. and Ots, M. 2015. The effect of replacing barley with glycerol in the diet of dairy cows on rumen parameters and milk fatty acid profile. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 209: 69-78.

Bach, A., Iglesias, C. and Devant, M. 2007. Daily rumen pH pattern of loosed-housed dairy cattle as affected by feeding pattern and live yeast supplementation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 136: 146-153.

Barnett, J.G.A. and Reid, R.L. 1956. Studies on production of volatile fatty acids from the grass by rumen liquor in an artificial rumen. Journal of Agricultural Science, 48: 315. Bipin, K.C., Ramesh, P.T. and Narayana Swamy, M. 2016. Effect of sodium bicarbonate supplementation on subacute ruminal acidosis (SARA) of milch cattle. International Journal of Scientific Research, 5: 9-11.

Chung, Y.H., Zhou, M., Holtshausen, L., Alexander, T.W., McAllister, T.A., Guan, L.L., Oba, M., and Beauchemin, K.A. 2012. A fibrolytic enzyme additive for lactating Holstein cow diets: Ruminal fermentation, rumen microbial populations, and enteric methane emissions. Journal of Dairy Science, 95: 1419-1427.

Chung, Y.H., Brown, N.E., Martinez, C.M., Cassidy, T.W. and Varga, G.A. 2009. Effect of rumen protected choline and dry propylene glycol on feed intake and blood parameters for Holstein dairy cows in early lactation. Journal of Dairy Science, 92: 2729-2736.

Das, M.N. and Giri, N.C. 1991. Design and Analysis of Experiments. Wiley Eastern Ltd., New Delhi, India.

Doepel, L. and Hayirli, A. 2011. Exclusion of dietary sodium bicarbonate from a wheat-based diet: Effects on milk production and ruminal fermentation. Journal of Dairy Science. 94: 370-375. Fisher, L.J., Erfle, J.D., Lodge, C.A. and Sauer, F.D. 1973. Effect of propylene glycol or glycerol supplementation of the diet of dairy cows on feed intake, milk yield and composition and incidence of ketosis Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 53: 289-296.

France, J., Dijkstra, J., Dhanoa, M.S., Theodorou, M.K., Lister, S.J., Davies, D.R. and Isac, D. A. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profile associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 163: 99-111.

Ivanor, N.P. 2014. Effect of glycerine and essential oils (Anacardium occidentale and Ricinus communis) on animal performance, feed efficiency and carcass characteristics of crossbred bulls finished in a feedlot system. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 13: 3492-3497.

LeRuvet, P. and Tucker, W. B. 1992. Ruminal buffers: Temporal effects on buffering capacity and pH of ruminal fluid from cows fed a high concentrate diet. Journal of Dairy Science, 75: 1069-1077.

Li, S., Khafipour, E., Krause, D.O., Kroeker, A., Rodriguez-Lecompte, J.C., Gozho, G.N. and Plaizier, J.C. 2012. Effects of subacute ruminal acidosis challenges on fermentation and endotoxins in the rumen and hindgut of dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 95: 294-303.

Malik, R. and Srinivas, B. 2010. Effect of source and dose of probiotics and exogenous fibrolytic enzymes (EFE) on intake, feed efficiency, and growth of male buffalo (Bubalus bubalis) calves. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 42: 1263–1269.

E. Lokesha et al.

Masoud, S., Eshaghian, M. and AminiPour, H. 2015. Effect of vitamin B9 on performance of animal: A review. World Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, Microbiology and Toxicology, 1: 32-36.

Menke, K.H. and Steingass, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28: 7-55.

Nocek, J.E., Kautz, W.P., Leedle, J.A.Z. and Allman. J.G. 2002. Ruminal supplementation of direct-fed microbials on diurnal pH variation and in situ digestion in dairy cattle. Journal of Dairy Science. 85: 429-433.

Pechova, A., Pecinka, P., Kudrnacova J. and Pavlata, L. 2014. The comparison of propylene glycol and glycerol as feed additives in early lactation of high producing dairy cows. Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences, 23: 285-292.

Salem, A.Z.M., El-Adawy, M.M., Gado, H.M., Camacho, L.M., Ronquillo, M., Alsersy, H. and Borhami, B. 2011. Effects of exogenous enzymes on nutrients digestibility and growth performance in sheep and goats. Tropical and Subtropical Ecosystem, 14: 867-874.

Scott, H.W. and Dehority, B.A. 1965. Vitamin requirements of several cellulolytic rumen bacteria. Journal of Bacteriology, 89: 1169-1175.

Shingfield, K.J., Jaakkola, S. and Huhtanan, P. 2002. Effect of forage conservation method, concentrate level and propylene glycol on diet digestibility, rumen fermentation, blood metabolite concentration and nutrient utilization of dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 84: 1-21.

Silva, L.S., Bezerra, L.R., Silva, A.M.D.A., Carneiro, H., Moreira, M. N. and Oliveira, R.L. 2015. In vitro degradation and gas production of glycerin generated in the biodiesel production chain. Acta Scientiarum. Animal Sciences Maringá, 37: 265-272.

Singh, A P. and Srinivas, B. 2012. Associative effects of cereals and oils cakes in concentrate supplements and complete diet for ruminants on in vitro fermentation kinetics. Applied Biological Research, 14: 131-137.

Srinivas, B. and Krishnamoorthy, U. 2005. Influence of diet induced changes in ruminant microbial characteristics on gas production kinetics of straw substrates in vitro. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 18: 990-996.

Srinivas, B. and Srinath, M. 2015. Impact of dual organism probiotics supplement on intake and milk yield during early, mid and late lactation in cows. Indian Journal of Animal Sciences, 86: 104-107.

Srinivas, B. and Swain, N. 2009. Influence of carbohydrates to protein ratio of concentrate feedstuffs on in vitro gas production kinetics and methanogenesis. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants 15: 162-171.

Tarek, A. Morsy. Ahmed, E. Kholf Sobhy M. Kholif Abdelkader M. Kholif Xuezhao Sun. Abdelfattah, Z.M. and Salem. 2015. Effects of two enzyme feed additives on digestion and milk production in lactating Egyptian buffaloes. Annals of Animal Science, 89: 97-103.

Thrune, M., Bach, A., Ruid-Moreno, M., Stern, M. D. and Linn, J. G. 2009. Effects of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on ruminal pH and microbial fermentation in dairy cows: Yeast supplementation on rumen fermentation. Livestock Science, 124: 261-265.

Wang, C., Liu, Q., Huo, W.J., Yang, W.Z., Dong, K.H., Huang, Y.X., Guo, G., Wang, Q., Liu Huo, W.J., Yang, W.Z., Dong, K.H., Huang, Y.X. and Guo, G. 2009. Effects of glycerol on rumen fermentation, urinary excretion of purine derivatives and feed digestibility in steers. Livestock Science, 121: 15-20.

Wang, Z., Karen, Z.A., Beauchemin, Tang, S., Zhou, C., Han, X., Wang, M., Kang, J., Nicholas, E., Odongo and Tan, Z. 2016. Evaluation of different yeast species for improving in vitro fermentation of cereal straws. Asian Australian Journal of Animal Science, 29: 230-240.

Published

2017-03-06

How to Cite

Effect Of Feed Additives On In Vitro Fermentation Kinetics And Substrate Utilization With And Without Buffer . (2017). Applied Biological Research, 19(1), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.48165/