Studies On Repellent And Feeding Behaviour Of House Rat, Rattus Rattus, In Response To Cinnamamide
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.48165/Keywords:
Cinnamamide, Ethovision video tracking system, eeding behaviour, Rattus rattus, feed scale consumption monitor, repellentAbstract
Rodenticides are the preferred option to prevent rodent attacks to crop produce. However, secondary poisoning and development of shyness and resistance among rodents after exposure to toxic chemicals has increased the search for plant based effective, safe and ecofriendly control methods. In present study, repellent and feeding behaviour of house rat in response to 0.4% cinnamamide based formulation was studied using automated Ethovision video tracking system and feed scale consumption monitor. Results revealed absence of primary repellent effect of cinnamamide formulation but existence of its secondary repellent effect against house rat. Repellent effect of cinnamamide increased with time during treatment period. Moreover, during treatment period, rats handled treated bait less frequently as compared to the untreated bait because feeding bouts events and feeding bout time also decreased during treatment period.
Downloads
References
Babbar, B.K., Kaur, J., Singla, N. and Mahal, A. 2015. Effectiveness and persistence of cinnamic aldehyde as an antifeedant on rats under storage conditions. Crop Protection, 67: 235-242. Chattopadhyay, D., Madhu, N.R. and Manna, C.K. 2010. Burrowing pattern and damage caused by the rodent pest, Indian house rat (Rattus rattus) in the gangetic plain of West Bengal, India. University Journal of Zoology, Rajshahi University, 28: 57-60.
Gillespie, H. and Myer, P. 2004. Rattus rattus: Animal Diversity [http://animaldiversity.ummz.umich/edu/site/accounts/information/Rattus].
He, Z.D., Qiao, C.F., Han, Q.B., Cheng, C.L., Xu, H.X., Jiang, R.W., But, P.P. and Shaw, P.C. 2005. Authentication and quantitative analysis on the chemical profile of cassia bark by high pressure liquid chromatography. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 53: 2424-2428.
Johnson, R.J., Koehler, A.E. and Burnside, O.C. 1982. Rodent repellents for planted grains. pp. 206-209. In: Proceedings of 10th Vertebrate Pest Conference (ed. R.E. Marsh), University of California, Davis, USA.
Kalanda-kanond-Thongsong, S., Daendee, S., Thonsong, B. and Chavananikul, V. 2010. The Efficacy of pure natural repellents on rat responses using circular open field. Thai Journal of Veterinary Medicine, 40: 411-418.
Krebs, J.R. and Davies, N.B. 1987. The designs of signals: Ecology and evolution. pp. 319-343. In: An Introduction to Behavioural Ecology (eds. J.R. Krebs and N.B. Davies). Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, UK.
Mason, J.R., Avery, M.L., Glahn, J.F., Otis, D.L., Matteson, R.E. and Nelms, C.O. 1991. Evaluation of methyl anthranilate relative to starch-plated dimethyl anthranilate as a bird repellent livestock feed additive. Journal of Wildlife Management, 55: 182-187.
Meerburg, G. and Kijlstra, W.A. 2008. The ethics of rodent control. Pest Management Science. 64: 1205-1211.
Mutze, G. and Sinclair, R. 2004. Efficacy of zinc phosphide, strychnine and chlopyrifos as rodenticides for the control of house mice in South Australian cereal crops. Wildlife Research, 31: 249-257.
Packiam, S.M., Anbalagan, V., Ignacimuthu, S. and Vendan, S.E. 2012. Formulation of a novel phytopesticide ponneem and its potentiality to control generalist herbivorous lepidopteran insect pests, Spodopteralitura (Fabricius) and Helicoverpaarmigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Diseases, 2: 720-723.
Sullivan, L. 2007. Commensal Rodents. [http://cals.arizona.edu/Yavapai].
Yun, E.J., Lee, S.B., Lee, H.K., Lee, H.S. and Ahn, Y.J. 1998. Antignawing activity of plant extracts against mice. Agricultural Chemistry and Biotechnology, 41: 95-98.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
How to Cite
