Gross Anatomy Of Radius And Ulna In Royal Bengal Tiger (Panthera Tigris)

Authors

  • M P S Tomar Department of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Veterinary Sciences, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Proddatur – 516 360, Andhra Pradesh (India)
  • J S Taluja Department of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Veterinary Sciences, Sri Venkateswara Veterinary University, Proddatur – 516 360, Andhra Pradesh (India)
  • Rakhi Vaish Department of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Veterinary Sciences, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur – 482 001, Madhya Pradesh (India)
  • A B Shrivastav Department of Veterinary Anatomy, College of Veterinary Sciences, Nanaji Deshmukh Veterinary Science University, Jabalpur – 482 001, Madhya Pradesh (India)
  • Deepak Sumbria Biomedical and Diagnostic Sciences Department, University of Tennessee, Knoxville (USA)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Biomechanics, osteology, radius, tiger, ulna

Abstract

Present study was carried out on the radius and ulna bones of five adult  royal Bengal tiger skeleton to notice the characteristic features from other carnivores. The radius was slightly twisted bone with an antero-posteriorly  flattened shaft and two extremities. The bicipital tuberosity was present on  the proximal part posterior surface. On the distal aspect of posterior surface  eight faint oblique lines were present. Proximal extremity had concave facet  circumscribed by a bony rim which was sharp and prominent on its lateral  part and blunt towards the medial side. Distal extremity was expanded and  was about twice the size of proximal extremity. It had a large concave facet  that extended medially and ventrally. Ulna was longer than the radius and  was fattened medio-laterally. Proximal extremity had olecranon process,  anconeus process and facet for humerus. Olecranon process possessed three  tubercles. The caudal one was largest (trifid) and lateral tubercle was  prominent and smooth and placed cranial to the medial one. Distal extremity was much smaller than the proximal extremity and had rounded facet  towards the medial side which articulated with the distal extremity of radius.  During morphometry of radius and ulna bones, a non-significant difference  was noticed between the bones of two fore limbs which may be of  biomechanical importance.  

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Boyd, J.S., Paterson, C. and May, A.H. 2001. Colour Atlas of Clinical Anatomy of Dog and Cat. (2nd edn.). Mosby Wolfe, Glasgow, UK.

Budras, K.D., McCarthy, P.H., Fricke, W. and Richter, R. 2007. Anatomy of the Dog (5th edn.). Schlutersche Verlags gesellschaft mbH & Co., Hannover, Germany.

Evans, H.W. and Christensen, G.C. 1979. Anatomy of the Dog. W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, USA.

Pandit, R.V. 1994. Osteology of Indian Tiger. Tech. Bull. No. VI. Conservator of Forest and Director Project Tiger, Melghat, Amravati, Maharashtra, India.

Podhade, D. 2007. Studies on Characteristic Features of Appendicular Skeleton of Leopard as an Aid in Wildlife Forensic. M.V.Sc. Thesis. JNKVV, Jabalpur, Madhya Pradesh, India. Sisson, R. 1975. Sisson and Grossman’s The Anatomy of Domestic Animals (5th edn.). W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, USA.

Tomar, M.P.S., Shrivastav, A.B. and Vaish Rakhi 2012a. Forensic osteoanatomy of ossa coxarum in tiger and leopard. Indian Wildlife Year Book, 10: 68-71.

Tomar, M.P.S., Shrivastav, A.B. and Vaish Rakhi 2012b. Comparative morphology of scapula in tiger and leopard. Indian Wildlife Year Book, 10: 73-75.

Tomar, M.P.S., Taluja, J.S., Vaish, R. and Shrivastav, A.B. 2014. Gross anatomical study on humerus of tiger (Panthera tigris). International Journal of Advanced Research, 2: 1034- 1040.

Tomar, M.P.S., Taluja, J.S., Vaish, R., Shrivastav, A.B., Shahi, A. and Sumbria, D. 2018. Gross anatomy of scapula in tiger (Panthera tigris). Indian Journal of Animal Research. (DOI: 10.18805/ijar.B-3252).

Published

2018-06-03

How to Cite

Gross Anatomy Of Radius And Ulna In Royal Bengal Tiger (Panthera Tigris) . (2018). Applied Biological Research, 20(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.48165/