Fermentation Value Of Some Agro-Industrial Co-Products Based On Gas Production Kinetics With Dual Rate Constants

Authors

  • Akash J Rathod Dairy Production, National Dairy Research Institute, Bangalore - 560 030, Karnataka (India)
  • Bandla Srinivas Dairy Production, National Dairy Research Institute, Bangalore - 560 030, Karnataka (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

Brans, by-products, dairy, husks, nutrition, shells

Abstract

Ten agro-industrial co-products (AICP) viz., wheat (WB) and deoiled rice  (DORB), gram chuni of green gram (GGC) and hyacinth bean (HBC), husk  of Bengal gram (BGH), pigeon pea (PPH), hyacinth bean (HBH) and soy (SH)  and ground shells of groundnuts (GSL) and almond (ASL) were evaluated  for chemical composition and fermentation value (FV) aiding in the selection  of feedstuffs in dairy rations. Total carbohydrates in AICPs consisted of 55  to 80% of NDF and 20 to 25% of NFC. CP in DORB was 49% bound to ADF  but in other AICPs it was < 2.5%. Although macronutrient composition of  DORB was better than WB, FV of DORB was 50% lesser than WB. Among  husk, IVGP was higher in the order of HBH> SH> PPH> BGH which was  more related to hemicellulose content than other cell wall constituents.  Although fermentation rate of GSL and ASL were above 10% like WB, their  extent of fermentation was 75 to 85% lesser than WB. Brans fermentation  was ≥10% h-1 while gram chuni were fermented at a rate of 5 to 9% h-1.  Husk fermentation rate was slow (3 to 6% h-1). CO2 to methane ratio, extent  and rate of fermentation were critical kinetic attributes to differentiate FV of  AICPs. Net gas production of AICPs was greater with higher hemicellulose.  Studies conclude that NGP or hemicelluloses of brans, chunis, husks or shells  could be criteria for their selection to incorporate in dairy cattle ration. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

AOAC. 2012. Official Methods of Analysis (19th edn.). Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Washington, USA.

France, J., Dijkstra, J., Dhanoa, M.S., Theodorou, M.K., Lister, S.J., Davies, D.R. and Isac, D.A. 1993. A model to interpret gas accumulation profile associated with in vitro degradation of ruminant feeds. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 163: 99-111.

Krishanmoorthy, U., Soller, H., Steingass, H. and Menke, K.H. 1991. A comparative study on rumen fermentation of energy supplements in vitro. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition, 65: 28-35.

Lokesha, E., Dhinesh Kumar, R. and Srinivas, B. 2017. Effect of feed additives on in vitro fermentation kinetics and substrate utilization with and without buffer. Applied Biological Research, 60: 40-45.

Makkar, H.P.S. 2004. Recent advances in the in vitro gas method for evaluation of nutritional quality of feed resources. pp. 170. In: Assessing the Quality and Safety of Animal Feeds. FAO Animal Production and Health Paper. Food & Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. [http://www.fao.org/docrep/007/y5159e/y5159e00.htm].

Menke, K.H. and Steingass, H. 1988. Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research and Development, 28: 7-55.

Mohanavel, S. and Srinivas, B. 2016a. Association between protein fractions and fermentation kinetics of edible oilseed meals used in dairy rations. Livestock Research International, 4: 23- 28.

Mohanavel, S. and Srinivas, B. 2016b. Rumen microbial and milk protein production on different source of oilseed meals in mixed diet of Deoni cows. Indian Journal of Animal Science, 86: 85-89.

Ozkul, H., Sayan, Y., Polat, M. and Kilic, A. 2011. In vitro parameters as predictors of metabolizable energy values of roughages. Journal of Applied Animal Research, 31: 85-88. Sing, A.P. and Srinivas, B. 2012. Associative effect of cereals and oil cakes in concentrate supplements and complete diet for ruminants on in vitro fermentation kinetics. Applied Biological Research, 14: 131-137.

Singh, A.P. and Srinivas, B. 2016. Source of carbohydrates from different grains on rumen microbial protein and milk production in native dairy cows. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 16: 297-306.

Srinivas, B. and Swain, N. 2009. Influence of carbohydrates to protein ratio of concentrate feedstuffs on in vitro gas production kinetics and methanogenesis. Indian Journal of Small Ruminants, 15: 163-171.

Fermentation value of some agro-industrial co-products 323

Srinivas, B. and Gupta, B.N. 1994. Rumen degradable protein content and gas production on rumen fermentation of some concentrate ingredients and their relationship. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition, 11: 171-175.

Srinivas, B. and Krishnamoorthy, U. 2005. Influence of diet induced changes in rumen microbial characteristics on gas production kinetics of straw substrates in vitro. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Science, 18: 990-996.

Thornely, J.H.M. and France, J. 2005. Mathematical Models in Agriculture (2nd edn.). CABI, Wallingford, UK.

Van Soest, P.J., Roberson, J.B. and Lewis, B.A. 1991. Methods for fiber, neutral detergent fiber and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science, 74: 3583- 3597.

Published

2018-10-03

How to Cite

Fermentation Value Of Some Agro-Industrial Co-Products Based On Gas Production Kinetics With Dual Rate Constants . (2018). Applied Biological Research, 20(3), 317–323. https://doi.org/10.48165/