Effect Of Water Regimes And Weed Management Practices On Water Productivity And Physiological Parameters Of Rice Under System Of Rice Intensification

Authors

  • Manzoor A Ganai Mountain Research Centre for Field Crops, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Khudwani - 192 124, Jammu & Kashmir (India)
  • M Anwar Bhat Mountain Research Centre for Field Crops, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Khudwani - 192 124, Jammu & Kashmir (India)
  • A Hussian Mountain Research Centre for Field Crops, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Khudwani - 192 124, Jammu & Kashmir (India)
  • N A Teli Mountain Research Centre for Field Crops, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Khudwani - 192 124, Jammu & Kashmir (India)
  • Talib Hussian Mountain Research Centre for Field Crops, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Khudwani - 192 124, Jammu & Kashmir (India)
  • Roman Nisar Mountain Research Centre for Field Crops, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences and Technology of Kashmir, Khudwani - 192 124, Jammu & Kashmir (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

PAR, SPAD, SRI, water expense efficiency

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted in a split-plot design at MRCFC,  SKUAST-K, Khudwani (Kashmir) in kharif 2012 and 2013 to assess the  effect of water regimes and weed management practices on water  productivity. photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) interception, leaf SPAD values and rice yield under system of rice intensification. The  treatments comprised of 3 irrigation regimes [alternate wetting and drying  (AWD), saturation conditions and continuous flooding, and 7 weed manage ment practices, pyrazosulfuron ethyl @ 20 g a.i. ha-1 at 3 days after  transplantation (DAT); cyhalofop butyl @ 80 g a.i, ha-1(15 DAT);  pyrazosulfuron ethyl 20 g a.i. fb cyhalofop butyl 80 g a.i. ha-1(3 and 15  DAT); butachlor @ 1.5 kg a.i., ha-1(3 DAT); cono weeding, control and weed  free condition. High PAR interception was noticed in flooding water regime  at 30 DAT followed by saturation water regime. All test water regimes were  at par in SPAD values. Water expense due to weed management practices was non-significant. Higher water expense efficiency, PAR and SPAD values  were observed in sequential application of pyrazosulfuron-ethyl @ 20 g a.i.,  ha-1fb cyhalofop-butyl @ 80 g a.i., ha-1. Significantly higher grain yield was found in saturated water regime. A yield superiority of 3.6 and 5.9% was  found by saturated water regime over AWD and continuous flooding. Amongst the herbicides, pyrazosulfuron-ethyl @ 20 g ha-1(3 DAT) fb  cyhalofop-butyl @ 80 g ha-1(15 DAT) gave significantly higher grain yield  over weedy check. The mean yield advantage by the use of pyrazosulfuron ethyl fb cyhalofop-butyl was 19.3, 14.0 and 10.3% over cyhalofop-butyl,  cono-weeding and butachlor, respectively, during both the years. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ahmad, S., Zia-ul-Haq, M., Ali, H., Shad, S.A., Ahmad, A., Maqsood, M., Khan, M.B., Mehmood S. and Hussain, A. 2008. Water and radiation use efficiencies of transplanted rice (Oryza sativa L.) at different plant densities and irrigation regimes under semi-arid environment. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 40: 199-209.

Manzoor A. Ganai et al.

Bali, A.S. and Uppal, H.S. 1999. Irrigation schedule in producing quality basmati rice (Oryza sativa). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 69: 325-328.

Cochran, W.G. and Cox, G.M. 1955. Experimental Designs. Wiley International, New York, USA. Dass, A., Chandra, S., Choudhary, A.K., Singh, G. and Sudhishri, S. 2016. Influence of field re ponding pattern and plant spacing on rice root-shoot characteristics, yield and water productivity of two modern cultivars under SRI management in Indian Mollisols. Paddy and Water Environment, 14: 45-59.

Dass, A. and Chandra, S. 2013. Panicle characteristics, yield and their correlation in system of rice (Oryza sativa) intensification under variable irrigation, spacing and varieties against conventional transplanting. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 58: 126-134.

Anonymous. 2017. Economic Survey, 2017. Directorate of Economics & Statistics, Jammu & Kashmir Government., Srinagar, J&K, India.

FAO STAT. 2010. Production Statistics. Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy. Ganai, M.A., Bhat, M.A., Hussian, A., Kanth, R.H., Telli, N.A., Hussian, T., Lone, A.H. and Ahmad, T. 2017. Effect of water regimes and weed management practices on growth, yield and weed control efficiency of rice under system of rice intensification. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 62(4): 114-120.

Geethalakshmi, V., Ramesh, T., Azhagu, P. and Lakshmanan, A. 2009. Agronomic evaluation of rice cultivation systems for water and grain productivity. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 57(2): 159-166.

Juraimi, A.S., Muhammad Saiful, A.H., Kamaluddin, M., Anuar, A.R. and Azmi, M. 2011. Diversity of weed communities under different water regimes in Bertam irrigated direct seeded rice field. Australian Journal of Crop Science, 5: 595-604.

Kumar, A. 2012. Integrated Weed Management in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Grown by System of Rice Intensification Method. Ph.D. thesis. Indian Agricultural Research Institute. New Delhi, India.

Leepipatpaiboon, S., Boonyawat, S. and Sarobol, E. 2009. Estimation of solar radiation use efficiency in paddy and cassava fields, Kasetsart. Journal of Natural Science, 43: 642-649. Oliver, M.M.H., Talukder, M.S.U. and Ahmed, M. 2008. Alternate wetting and drying irrigation for rice cultivation. Journal of Bangladesh Agriculture University, 6: 409-414.

Satyanarayana, A., Thiyagarajan, T.M. and Uphoff, N. 2007. Opportunities for water saving with higher yield from the system of rice intensification. Irrigation Science, 25: 99-115. Son, N.T. Badayos, R.B., Sanchez, P.B., Cruz, P.C.S., Dung, N.V. and Thanh, N.H. 2008. Water productivity and soil chemical properties under varying water regimes on spring rice (Oryza sativa L.) in Hanoi, Vietnam. Philippine Journal of Crop Science, 33(3): 56-70. Stoop W.A., Uphoff, N. and Kassam, A. 2002. A review of agricultural research issues raised by the system of rice intensification (SRI) from Madagascar: Opportunities for improving farming systems for resource poor farmers. Agriculture Systems, 71: 249-274. Uphoff, N. and Randriamiharisoa, R. 2002. Reducing water use in irrigated rice production with the Madagascar system of rice intensification. pp. 71-87. In: Water-wise Rice Production (eds. B.A.M., Bouman, H. Hengsdijk, B. Hardy, P.S. Bindraban, T.P. Tuong and J.K. Ladha). IRRI, Los Banos, Philippines.

Published

2019-06-01

How to Cite

Effect Of Water Regimes And Weed Management Practices On Water Productivity And Physiological Parameters Of Rice Under System Of Rice Intensification . (2019). Applied Biological Research, 21(2), 145–150. https://doi.org/10.48165/