Ammi Analysis Of Wheat Genotypes Under Restricted Irrigated Timely Sown Conditions For Peninsular Zone Of India

Ajay Verma; G P  Singh

doi:10.48165/

Authors

Ajay Verma ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal - 132 001, Haryana (India)
G P Singh ICAR-Indian Institute of Wheat and Barley Research, Karnal - 132 001, Haryana (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

AMMI model, ASV, ASTAB, biplot analysis, MASV, SIPC

Abstract

Variable yield performances of cereal crops have been reported across the environments while prior to the release of cultivars in wheat genotype x environment (G x E) effects are estimated. Crossover G x E interaction decreases the efficiency of cultivar selection by reducing the correlation between phenotype- and genotype-values. In present study a number of AMMI based measures were compared for the wheat genotypes evaluated under Peninsular zone of India. Genotypes ‘MPO 1336’, ‘HI 8805’ and ‘NIAW 3170’ identified by the values of EV1, D1, ASTAB1 and SIPC1 favored ‘MACS 4058’, ‘DBW 93’ and ‘GW 1346’. Measures based on two IPS’s (ASV & ASV1) recommended ‘MACS 4059’, ‘UAS 446’ and ‘NIAW 3170’ genotypes. Analytic measures MASV and MASV1 selected ‘MACS 4059’, ‘UAS 446’ and ‘MACS 6696’ wheat genotypes for stable performance. HM, PRVG and MHPRVG identified ‘UAS 446’, ‘MACS 6695’ and ‘HI 1605’ consistent yield. Biplot analysis showed larger cluster of D2, EV2, ASV, ASV1 and ASTAB2. ASV expressed choice for ‘HI1605’, MACS 6695’and ‘HI 8805’ while ASV1 recommended ‘MACS 6695’, ‘HI1605’ and ‘HI 8805’ genotypes for the 2nd year (2018-19). MASV measure found ‘HI1605’, ‘NIDW 1149’, HI 8802 of choice and MASV1 settled for ‘HI1 605’, ‘HI 8805’ and ‘NIDW 1149’ genotypes. Wheat genotypes ‘NIAW 3170’, ‘MACS 6695’ and ‘MACS 6696’ were identified by HM, PRVG and MHPRVG measures. Larger cluster consisted of EV1, D1, D2, EV2, ASV, ASV1, MASV, MASV1, ASTAB1 and ASTAB2 in biplot analysis. Mean, HM, PRVG, MHPRVG and GAI along with SIPC2 and SIPC3 clubbed in 4th cluster. Analytic measures of adaptability exhibited affiliation with measure-based values of IPC scores.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Agahi, K., Ahmadi, J., Oghan, H.A., Fotokian, M.H. and Orang, S.F. 2020. Analysis of genotype × environment interaction for seed yield in spring oilseed rape using the AMMI model. Crop Breeding and Applied Biotechnology, 20(1): 1-8.

Ajay, B.C., Aravind, J., Fiyaz, R., Abdul, K., Narendra, C.L., Gangadhar, K., Kona Praveen, Dagla, M.C. and Bera, S.K. 2019. Rectification of modified AMMI stability value (MASV). Indian Journal of Genetics, 79(4): 726-731.

Akbarpour, O., Dehghani, H., Sorkhi, B. and Guach, G. 2014. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction in barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) based on AMMI model using developed SAS program. Journal of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, 16: 919-930.

Annicchiarico, P. 1997. Joint regression vs AMMI analysis of genotype × environment interactions for cereals in Italy. Euphytica, 94: 53-62.

Bocianowsk, J., Warzecha, T., Nowosad, K., and Bathelt, R. 2019. Genotype by environment interaction using AMMI model and estimation of additive and epistasis gene effects for 1000- kernel weight in spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). Journal of Applied Genetics, 60: 127-135.

Gauch, H.G. 2013. A simple protocol for AMMI analysis of yield trials. Crop Science, 53: 1860- 1869.

Guilly, S., Thomas, D., Audrey, T., Laurent, B., and Jean-Yves, H. 2017. Analysis of multi environment trials (MET) in the sugarcane breeding program of Re´union Island. Euphytica, 213: 213-233.

Haider, Z., Akhter, M., Mahmood, A. and Khan, R.A.R. 2017. Comparison of GGE biplot and AMMI analysis of multi-environment trial (MET) data to assess adaptability and stability of rice genotypes. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 12: 3542-3548.

Kendal, E. and Tekdal, S. 2016. Application of AMMI model for evolution spring barley genotypes in multi-environment trials. Bangladesh Journal of Botany, 45(3): 613-620.

Ajay Verma and G.P. Singh

Mohammadi, R. and Amri, A. 2008. Comparison of parametric and non-parametric methods for selecting stable and adapted durum wheat genotypes in variable environments. Euphytica, 159: 419-432.

Purchase, J.L. 1997. Parametric Analysis to Describe G × E Interaction and Yield Stability in Winter Wheat. Ph.D. thesis. Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agriculture, University of the Orange Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

Purchase, J.L., Hatting, H. and Van Deventer, C.S. 2000. Genotype x environment interaction of winter wheat (T. aestivum) in South Africa: Stability analysis of yield performance. South African Journal of Plant and Soil, 17(3): 101-107.

Rao, A.R. and Prabhakaran, V.T. 2005. Use of AMMI in simultaneous selection of genotypes for yield and stability. Journal of the Indian Society of Agricultural Statistics, 59: 76-82. Resende, M.D.V de and Duarte, J.B. 2007. Precision and quality control in variety trials. Pesquisa Agropecuaria Tropical, 37(3): 182-194.

Shahriari, Z., Heidari, B. and Dadkhodaie, A .2018. Dissection of genotype × environment interactions for mucilage and seed yield in Plantago species: Application of AMMI and GGE biplot analyses. PLoS ONE ,13(5): e0196095 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196095

Sneller, C.H., Kilgore-Norquest L. and Dombek, D. 1997. Repeatability of yield stability statistics in soybean. Crop Science, 37: 383-390.

Tekdal, S. and Kendal, E. 2018. AMMI model to assess durum wheat genotypes in multi-environment trials. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 20: 153-166.

Yang, R.C., Crossa, J., Cornelius, P.L. and Burgueño, J. 2009. Biplot analysis of genotype x environment interaction: proceed with caution. Crop Science, 49: 1564-1576. Zali, H., Farshadfar, E., Sabaghpour, S.H. and Karimizadeh, R. 2012. Evaluation of genotype × environment interaction in chickpea using measures of stability from AMMI model. Annals of Biological Research, 3(7): 3126-3136.

Zobel, R. 1994. Stress resistance and root systems. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Adaptation of Plants to Serious Stresses. 1-4 August, 1994, INTSORMIL Publication 94-2, Institute of Agriculture and Natural Recourses. University of Nebraska. Lincoln, USA.