Evaluation Of Stress Tolerance Indices In Huw-234 X Huw-468 Derived Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Ril Mapping Population For Identification Of Heat Tolerant Genotypes

Authors

  • Sadiah Shafi Division of Genetics & Plant Breeding, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology (SKUAST) of Kashmir, Wadura, Sopore - 193 201, Jammu & Kashmir (India)
  • Parvaze A Sofi Division of Genetics & Plant Breeding, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology (SKUAST) of Kashmir, Wadura, Sopore - 193 201, Jammu & Kashmir (India)
  • Bikram Singh Division of Genetics & Plant Breeding, SKUAST-Jammu, Chatta - 180 001, Jammu & Kashmir (India)
  • J P Jaiswal Division of Genetics & Plant Breeding, GB Pant University of Agriculture & Technology, Pantnagar - 263 145, Uttarakhand (India)
  • V K Mishra Division of Genetics & Plant Breeding, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi, Uttar Pradesh (India)
  • R R Mir Division of Genetics & Plant Breeding, S.K. University of Agricultural Sciences & Technology (SKUAST) of Kashmir, Wadura, Sopore - 193 201, Jammu & Kashmir (India)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.48165/

Keywords:

GMP, RIL, stress tolerance indices, SSI, wheat, yield traits

Abstract

A ‘HUW-234 x HUW-468’ RIL population of wheat was evaluated along with 2 parental checks under normal (NS) and heat stress (HS)  environments. Five stress tolerance indices namely SSI, TOL, MP, GMP  and STI were used to discriminate the genotypic response in terms of  susceptibility and tolerance to heat stress using comparative yield data  under stress and non-stress conditions. Among various indices used, the  mean value and the minimum and maximum values recorded were 0.972  (0.270 and 1.386) for SSI, 2.469 (0.428 and 5.362) for TOL, 2.781 (1.635 and  4.124) for MP, 2.465 (1.449 and 3.667) for GMP and 0.401 (0.145 and 0.838)  for STI, respectively. Yield (YHS) was found positively correlated with  GMP (r = 0.752), followed by STI (r = 0.699) and MP (0.416) but negatively correlated with SSI (r = -0.699) and TOL (r = -0.361). Yield (YNS) was found positively correlated with MP (r = 0.923), followed by TOL (r = 0.919), GMP (r = 0.676) and SSI (r = 0.653). Based on this study it is recommended  that the genotypes having higher value of GMP and STI should be selected  while as the genotypes with higher SSI, TOL and STI should be rejected. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ali, A. and Al Sadek, P. 2016. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices for wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under irrigated and rainfed conditions. Communications in Biometry and Crop Science, 11(1): 77-89.

Anonymous. 2017. Digest of Statistics. Directorate of Economics and Statistics, Government of Jammu and Kashmir, Srinagar, J&K.

Anonymous. 2019. Annual Report. Department of Agriculture, Cooperation & Farmers Welfare Ministry of Agriculture & Farmers Welfare Government of India, New Delhi, India [www.agricoop.nic.in].

Blum, A. 2005. Drought resistance, water-use efficiency and yield potential - Are they compatible, dissonant or mutually exclusive? Australia Journal of Agriculture Research, 56: 1159-1168. Chopra, R.K., Shukla, S., Singh, K., Kadam, S.B. and Singh, N.K. 2012. Characterization of high yielding and drought tolerant RILs identified from wheat cross WL711 x C306 RIL mapping population using drought susceptibility index (DSI) as selection criteria. Indian Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 26: 25-31.

Dejan, D., Miroslav, Z., Desimier, K., Stephen, R.K. and Gordana, S.M. 2008. Genotype x environment interaction for wheat yield in different drought stress conditions and agronomic traits suitable for selection. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 59: 536-545.

Dubey, R., Pathak, H., Chakrabarti, B., Singh, R., Gupta, D.K. and Harit, R.C. 2020. Impact of terminal heat stress on wheat yield in India and options for adaptation. Agricultural Systems, 181: 102826.

Enghiad, A., Ufer, D., Countryman, A.M. and Thilmany, D.D. 2017. An overview of global wheat market fundamentals in an era of climate concerns. International Journal of Agronomy, 2017: 1-15 Article ID 3931897 [https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3931897].

FAO. 2017. FOASTAT. Food and Agricultural Organization, Rome, Italy [www.faostat.org]. Fard, A.K. and Sedaghat, S. 2013. Evaluation of drought indices in bread wheat recombinant inbred lines. European Journal of Experimental Biology, 3(2): 201-204.

Farooq, M., Bramley, H., Palta, J.A. and Siddique, K.H. 2011. Heat stress in wheat during reproductive and grain-filling phases. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 30(6): 491-507. Federer W.T., Reynolds, M. and Crossa, J. 2001. Combining results from augmented designs over sites. Agronomy Journal, 93: 389-395.

Federer, W.T. 1956. Augmented (or Hoonuiaku) Designs. Biometrics Unit Technical Reports: Number BU-74-M, page No. 341, Cornell University, Cornell, USA.

Sadiah Shafi et al.

Fernandez, G.C. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing plant stress tolerance. pp. 257-227. In: Proceeding of Symposium on Adaptation of Vegetables and Other Food Crops in Temperature and Water Stress, August 13-16, Shanhua, Taiwan.

Fischer R.A. and Maurer R. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Crop and Pasture Science, 29: 897-912.

IPCC. 2007. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report: Climate Change 2007. Synthesis Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, World Meteorological Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.

Joshi, A.K., Mishra, B., Chatrath, R., Ferrara, G.O. and Singh, R.P. 2007. Wheat improvement in India: Present status, emerging challenges and future prospects. Euphytica, 157(3): 431-446. Kamrani, M., Hoseini, Y. and Ebadollahi, A. 2018. Evaluation for heat stress tolerance in durum wheat genotypes using stress tolerance indices. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science, 64: 38-45.

Khan, A.A. and Kabir, M.R. 2014. Evaluation of spring wheat genotypes (Triticum aestivum L.) for heat stress tolerance using different stress tolerance indices. Cercetări Agronomice în Moldova, 4: 49-63.

Mohammadi, R., Armion, M., Kahrizi, D and Amri, A. 2010. Efficiency of screening techniques for evaluating durum wheat genotypes under mild drought condition. International Journal of Plant Production, 4: 11-14.

Moosavi, S., YazdiSamdi B., Naghavi M., Zali A., Dashti H. and Pourshabazi A. 2008. Introduction of new indices to identify relative drought tolerant and resistant genotypes of wheat. Desert, 12: 165-178.

Nouraein, M., Mohammadi, S.A., Aharizad, S., Moghaddam, M. andSadeghzadeh, B. 2013. Evaluation of drought tolerance indices in wheat recombinant inbred line population. Annals of Biological Research, 4(3): 113-122.

Panthuwan, G., Fokai, S., Cooper, M., Rajatasereekul, S., and O’Toole, J.C. 2002. Yield response of rice genotypes to different types of drought under rainfed lowlands. Part 1: Grain yield and yield components. Journal of Field Crop Research, 41: 45-54.

Poorter, L., Bongers, F., Aide, T.M., Zambrano, A.M.A., Balvanera, P., Becknell, J.M. and Craven, D. 2016. Biomass resilience of Neotropical secondary forests. Nature, 530(7589): 211. Rosielle, R. and Hamblin, J. 1981. Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environment. Crop Science, 21: 943-946.

Samper, C. 1984. Effect of Water Stress Imposed at Mid-pod Filling upon Yield and Dry Matter Partitioning in Dry Beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). MS thesis, Michigan State University, East Lansing, USA. Diss Abstr. 13-25000.

Semenov, M.A. and Halford, N.G. 2009. Identifying target traits and molecular mechanisms for wheat breeding under a changing climate. Journal of Experimental Botany, 60(10): 2791-2804. Thiry, A., Perla, N., Chavez, D., Reynolds, M.P. and Davies, W.J. 2016. How can we improve crop genotypes to increase stress resilience and productivity in a future climate? A new crop screening method based on productivity and resistance to abiotic stress. Journal of Experimental Botany, 67: 593-603.

Wahid, A., Perveen, M., Gelani, S. and Basra, S.M. 2007. Pretreatment of seed with H2O2 improves salt tolerance of wheat seedlings by alleviation of oxidative damage and expression of stress proteins. Journal of Plant Physiology, 164(3): 283-294.

Wang, X., Cai, J., Jiang, D., Liu, F., Dai, T. and Cao, W. 2011. Pre-anthesis high-temperature acclimation alleviates damage to the flag leaf caused by post-anthesis heat stress in wheat. Journal of Plant Physiology, 168(6): 585-593.

Published

2020-06-03

How to Cite

Evaluation Of Stress Tolerance Indices In Huw-234 X Huw-468 Derived Wheat (Triticum Aestivum L.) Ril Mapping Population For Identification Of Heat Tolerant Genotypes . (2020). Applied Biological Research, 22(2), 184–190. https://doi.org/10.48165/